@eb96193@InfoSudLiban Se mentir en minisant nos pertes ne nous rend pas service non plus. Et surtout, il se dit un compte d'informations donc je vois pas le problème
C’est l’histoire de la viiiiiiie, le cycle éternellll, une nation du racisme, pour sa place au soleil ☀️🦁 🎶
Après y a des cycles et des traditions qu’on a le droit de stopper aussi hein ! On peut virer Scar du pouvoir 😏
https://t.co/0ANeCJjmsY
I will never forget the images from Iran during the war. When the Axis of Epstein threatened to bomb Iran's bridges and energy infrastructure, people went and stood exactly where the bombs were meant to fall.
In that moment, they showed the world what it means to follow Muhammad and his Holy Household: to stand firm in the face of fear and refuse to be intimidated.
Tbh idk what else Hezbollah can do at this point.
These past 3 years I learned that 85% of Muslims are useless, if it weren’t for the 15% that are Shia, we’d all be speaking Hebrew.
If you have any other opinion, kindly sanitize it and shove it up your ass.
Pendant des années, toute la France médiatique nous a vendu Charlie Hebdo comme le symbole ultime de la liberté d’expression.
“On peut rire de tout.”
“Pas de sujet interdit.”
“L’humour ne doit jamais être censuré.”
Magnifique.
Mais apparemment… il existait quand même une petite ligne invisible. Une frontière sacrée. Un sujet qu’il ne fallait surtout pas toucher.
Aujourd’hui, @laRadioNova ose faire exactement ce que @Charlie_Hebdo_ prétendait défendre : provoquer, déranger, se moquer des puissants et casser les réflexes de propagande médiatique.
Et soudain, panique générale.
Caroline Fourest fulmine. Sophia Aram s’indigne. Les gardiens autoproclamés du “camp du bien” réclament des têtes, des excuses, des limites, des sanctions symboliques.
En réalité, leur problème n’est pas l’humour.
Leur problème, c’est que l’humour change de cible.
Quand on caricature certaines religions, certains milieux populaires ou certains Français jugés “ringards”, c’est du courage.
Quand l’ironie vise Israël ou ses relais médiatiques, cela devient immédiatement “dangereux”, “nauséabond” ou “irresponsable”.
Donc la liberté d’expression était totale… mais sous conditions.
Une liberté sous abonnement idéologique.
Et c’est précisément pour ça que Radio Nova cartonne aujourd’hui. Parce qu’une partie énorme du public étouffait dans un paysage médiatique devenu hypocrite, moralisateur et ultra-filtré.
Nova redonne quelque chose que les Français n’avaient plus entendu depuis longtemps : une parole libre, insolente, imprévisible.
Le plus ironique dans l’histoire ?
Ceux qui réclament aujourd’hui la censure de Nova sont souvent les mêmes qui défilaient hier derrière des pancartes “Je suis Charlie”.
Visiblement, ils voulaient surtout être Charlie… à condition de choisir eux-mêmes les cibles autorisées.
The most dangerous outcome of today's Israel-Lebanon negotiations in Washington is not simply normalisation with Israel, or even the normalisation of its occupation and aggression, but the official forging of a soon-to-be-announced threat-based alliance between the Zionist enemy and the US on one hand, and the Lebanese authorities on the other with Lebanon positioned as the junior co-belligerent in a counter-insurgency/counter-"terrorism" mandate against the resistance. And because Hizbullah is not an external militia but the organic political-military expression of an entire resistance community, this counter-insurgency mandate is also a war on the Shia community as a political community.
This is not an overstatement when the reported formula ties any actual ceasefire to two parallel tracks: a gradual Israeli withdrawal that could take up to two years, and a comprehensive Lebanese-Israeli-US enforcement “mechanism” to disarm the resistance. In this manner, the end of Israeli occupation and aggression becomes the reward for dismantling Hizbullah, rather than the starting point of diplomacy.
This reverses the entire logic of the conflict, treating resistance not as the effect of occupation, but as its cause, and effectively relocating the enemy from without to within.
The occupation is thus transformed from aggression into an invited disciplinary presence, preserving Lebanon as a US protectorate organised around a political, economic and security order whose central purpose is the suppression of resistance to its own territorial dismemberment.
What this framework cannot account for is that Hizbullah is not an organisation imposed on a community, but a community that organised itself. Mechanisms can seize facilities and weapons, but they cannot seize the will of a people who have spent more than four decades resisting and sacrificing, in different ways, for their land, lives and dignity. That community will fight, not despite this arrangement but because of it, and because it understands, better than any party in Washington or Beirut, that what is being demanded of it is not disarmament but political annihilation. And it won’t just be Israel they will be fighting, but Lebanon’s internal Israelis, i.e. the right-wing authorities and their allies who have made themselves the domestic arm of the enemy’s war.
@DanDeFiEd Just consider US coffee another drink. It's another culture just leave them be. I'm an espresso consumer btw but if they don't mind losing time and money, whatever.
In case anyone is confused about what this is:
This illegal Israeli occupation map includes the sea, coincidentally where Lebanon’s gas and oil fields are.
This is and always has been a land and resources grab.