How Zionist propaganda short term strategy is to lie, deny, distort, and deflect from crimes against humanity.
Zionism is a perpetual state of conflict to legitimise its ethnosupremacism.
Some regular responses.
1. Antisemitism
2. Israel has the “right to…”
3. Ironically label an opposing position as a Nazi
4. Israel is winning
5. Israel is winning and everyone is jealous?
6. “You’re a Jew hater” for mentioning Israel and Zionist crimes against humanity
7. Something about a promise 2999 years ago
8. Gods “chosen” people
9. Antiseptic
10. Ignore Netanyahus orchestration of Oct 7
11. It’s not a genocide
12. Hamas genocide Israel not genocide
13. Israel mostest moral
14. Israel big and strong
15. Block after last personal smear regarding intelligence
There is no coherent rationale in the response to killing civilians or illegally occupying or annexing land through ethnic cleansing.
False.
Zionism is a political ideology of ethnosupremacism and a form of racism.
Judaism is a century’s old religion.
In 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 declared Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination" (72–35, 32 abstentions). It was revoked in 1991, after Israel made repeal a condition of joining the Madrid peace process and as the Cold War's end weakened its backers. That was a shift in leverage, not a reassessment of the charge.
Zionism is not Jewish self-determination, just as Nazism was never simply German nationalism. My comparison is not about who the victims are. It is about what each ideology permits: that another people's rights, land and lives can be subordinated to one's own ambitions. Once that is accepted, the victim's identity is incidental.
Zionism has justified the 1948 expulsions and decades of settlement expansion. Zionism depends on dehumanising those they displace.
An ideology that treats harming or destroying another people as justified is the same in kind. In 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each concluded that Israel's system of control over Palestinians amounts to apartheid.
Opposing this is not opposing Jews or Judaism. The IHRA definition blurs that line and, I believe, shields Zionist conduct from legitimate criticism. Its lead drafter, Kenneth Stern, has warned that it is being misused to suppress political speech.
To support Zionism as it operates is to consent to the belief that one people's dispossession is an acceptable price for another's ambitions. The world claimed to reject that belief in 1945.
Stupid speech. Rather than addressing Zionist ideology, you weaponise Judaism.
Zionism is not Judaism
Zionism is not being Jewish
Zionism is an ethnosupremacist ideology and a form of racisms.
In 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 declared Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination" (72–35, 32 abstentions). It was revoked in 1991, after Israel made repeal a condition of joining the Madrid peace process and as the Cold War's end weakened its backers. That was a shift in leverage, not a reassessment of the charge.
Zionism is not Jewish self-determination, just as Nazism was never simply German nationalism. My comparison is not about who the victims are. It is about what each ideology permits: that another people's rights, land and lives can be subordinated to one's own ambitions. Once that is accepted, the victim's identity is incidental.
Zionism has justified the 1948 expulsions and decades of settlement expansion. Zionism depends on dehumanising those they displace.
An ideology that treats harming or destroying another people as justified is the same in kind. In 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each concluded that Israel's system of control over Palestinians amounts to apartheid.
Opposing this is not opposing Jews or Judaism. The IHRA definition blurs that line and, I believe, shields Zionist conduct from legitimate criticism. Its lead drafter, Kenneth Stern, has warned that it is being misused to suppress political speech.
To support Zionism as it operates is to consent to the belief that one people's dispossession is an acceptable price for another's ambitions. The world claimed to reject that belief in 1945.
Zionism is not Judaism
Zionism is not being Jewish
Zionism is an ethnosupremacist ideology and a form of racisms.
In 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 declared Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination" (72–35, 32 abstentions). It was revoked in 1991, after Israel made repeal a condition of joining the Madrid peace process and as the Cold War's end weakened its backers. That was a shift in leverage, not a reassessment of the charge.
Zionism is not Jewish self-determination, just as Nazism was never simply German nationalism. My comparison is not about who the victims are. It is about what each ideology permits: that another people's rights, land and lives can be subordinated to one's own ambitions. Once that is accepted, the victim's identity is incidental.
Zionism has justified the 1948 expulsions and decades of settlement expansion. Zionism depends on dehumanising those they displace.
An ideology that treats harming or destroying another people as justified is the same in kind. In 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each concluded that Israel's system of control over Palestinians amounts to apartheid.
Opposing this is not opposing Jews or Judaism. The IHRA definition blurs that line and, I believe, shields Zionist conduct from legitimate criticism. Its lead drafter, Kenneth Stern, has warned that it is being misused to suppress political speech.
To support Zionism as it operates is to consent to the belief that one people's dispossession is an acceptable price for another's ambitions. The world claimed to reject that belief in 1945.
@Calder197@perayahmet No they’re not.
Judaism is a centuries old religion
Zionism is a political ideology formed in Eastern Europe during the late 19ths century.
@RalphStack11@antisemitism@TheGreenParty@EHRC@GideonFalter It's no good bleating about Zionism awhen you have not the faintest idea what it is. You are the ones putting Jews at risk with your lies and false allegations. Read some history.
@Scottrhawk555@koshercockney@Deansbomb “Every point you made is a lie”
Guess coherent rationale went out the window. Yikes.
Arabs are Nazis? lol
Those authors have Zionist Eastern European names. Funny that