How Zionist propaganda short term strategy is to lie, deny, distort, and deflect from crimes against humanity.
Zionism is a perpetual state of conflict to legitimise its ethnosupremacism.
Some regular responses.
1. Antisemitism
2. Israel has the “right to…”
3. Ironically label an opposing position as a Nazi
4. Israel is winning
5. Israel is winning and everyone is jealous?
6. “You’re a Jew hater” for mentioning Israel and Zionist crimes against humanity
7. Something about a promise 2999 years ago
8. Gods “chosen” people
9. Antiseptic
10. Ignore Netanyahus orchestration of Oct 7
11. It’s not a genocide
12. Hamas genocide Israel not genocide
13. Israel mostest moral
14. Israel big and strong
15. Block after last personal smear regarding intelligence
There is no coherent rationale in the response to killing civilians or illegally occupying or annexing land through ethnic cleansing.
@Scottrhawk555@koshercockney@Deansbomb “Every point you made is a lie”
Guess coherent rationale went out the window. Yikes.
Arabs are Nazis? lol
Those authors have Zionist Eastern European names. Funny that
Stupid speech. Rather than addressing Zionist ideology, you weaponise Judaism.
Zionism is not Judaism
Zionism is not being Jewish
Zionism is an ethnosupremacist ideology and a form of racisms.
In 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 declared Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination" (72–35, 32 abstentions). It was revoked in 1991, after Israel made repeal a condition of joining the Madrid peace process and as the Cold War's end weakened its backers. That was a shift in leverage, not a reassessment of the charge.
Zionism is not Jewish self-determination, just as Nazism was never simply German nationalism. My comparison is not about who the victims are. It is about what each ideology permits: that another people's rights, land and lives can be subordinated to one's own ambitions. Once that is accepted, the victim's identity is incidental.
Zionism has justified the 1948 expulsions and decades of settlement expansion. Zionism depends on dehumanising those they displace.
An ideology that treats harming or destroying another people as justified is the same in kind. In 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each concluded that Israel's system of control over Palestinians amounts to apartheid.
Opposing this is not opposing Jews or Judaism. The IHRA definition blurs that line and, I believe, shields Zionist conduct from legitimate criticism. Its lead drafter, Kenneth Stern, has warned that it is being misused to suppress political speech.
To support Zionism as it operates is to consent to the belief that one people's dispossession is an acceptable price for another's ambitions. The world claimed to reject that belief in 1945.
Zionism is not Judaism
Zionism is not being Jewish
Zionism is an ethnosupremacist ideology and a form of racisms.
In 1975, UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 declared Zionism "a form of racism and racial discrimination" (72–35, 32 abstentions). It was revoked in 1991, after Israel made repeal a condition of joining the Madrid peace process and as the Cold War's end weakened its backers. That was a shift in leverage, not a reassessment of the charge.
Zionism is not Jewish self-determination, just as Nazism was never simply German nationalism. My comparison is not about who the victims are. It is about what each ideology permits: that another people's rights, land and lives can be subordinated to one's own ambitions. Once that is accepted, the victim's identity is incidental.
Zionism has justified the 1948 expulsions and decades of settlement expansion. Zionism depends on dehumanising those they displace.
An ideology that treats harming or destroying another people as justified is the same in kind. In 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each concluded that Israel's system of control over Palestinians amounts to apartheid.
Opposing this is not opposing Jews or Judaism. The IHRA definition blurs that line and, I believe, shields Zionist conduct from legitimate criticism. Its lead drafter, Kenneth Stern, has warned that it is being misused to suppress political speech.
To support Zionism as it operates is to consent to the belief that one people's dispossession is an acceptable price for another's ambitions. The world claimed to reject that belief in 1945.
Where does it say I hate Judaism?
You need a race for racism…
Bigoted, because I don’t support Israeli occupation?
Free Palestine. Yes, I support Palestine because Israel no different to Nazi Germany with its supremacism and intent of dispossession of another indigenous population.
Zionism is a cancer. You know who taught me this? Israelis and Zionists.
Where is your data from?
Please provide the legal definition of genocide?
Please provide where it makes a reference to a population size?
Restraint? Israel has obliterated shelter, food, water and access to basic healthcare facilities.
There is no other intent, other than genocide when an advanced military power does this against the civilian population.
Humanity will continue to mobilise.
Humanity is united against Israel and Zionism.
Many of us do stand with Palestine.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, old, young, brown, black, white, Irish, Welsh, Scottish, English.
Every colour, culture, and creed.
@darc87798@jeremycorbyn There is no such thing as “Israel”. There is no legal or moral argument for the Israeli occupation on top of Palestine.
No AI Slop can alter history
@MediumDebyOuld@jeremycorbyn What a fucking moronic comment.
Israel commits genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Palestinian holocaust.
You cannot selectively apply the term terrorist.
Humanity will continue to mobilise against Israel and Zionism.
Humanity is united against Israel and Zionism.
Many of us do stand with Palestine.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, old, young, brown, black, white, Irish, Welsh, Scottish, English.
Every colour, culture, and creed.