Larry Jones

Retired, and tired of the BS

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@MajToure @TaraBull Haven’t been in a WalMart lately, have you?

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@MyastheniaGNews 🥄

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@ThrillaRilla369 Ditto machines

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

My fellow citizens of the free world,

I stand before you not as a politician seeking power, but as a human being who still believes in something simple and sacred:

That every nation has the right — and the duty — to protect its own people first.

If I were British, I would vote Restore.
If I were German, I would vote AfD.
If I were Italian, I would follow Giorgia Meloni without hesitation.
And if I were American, I would vote Republican. Every single time.

Not out of hatred.
Not out of fear.
But out of love.

Love for the country that raised me.
Love for the culture that shaped me.
Love for the children who will inherit whatever we leave behind.

There is a force in this world — quiet, patient, and immensely powerful — that has decided our nations must be broken.
It does not come with tanks.
It comes with open borders, with endless guilt, and with the soft language of “human rights” and “equality.”

It uses people from distant lands as instruments.
It tells us that to resist is to be cruel.
It tells us that to prefer our own people is to be evil.

And so the left sings its beautiful songs of compassion…
while our cities change beyond recognition,
while our women walk in fear,
while our children are taught to be ashamed of their own history,
and while the very idea of a people, a homeland, a shared destiny is slowly erased.

They promise utopia.
What they deliver is something much darker.

A future where free nations collapse into managed chaos…
and where the only ones left standing are the strongmen who never believed in our soft illusions —
the Putins, the Xis, the Kims, and the African dictators who laugh at our self-destruction.

Is that the future you want?
To become the servants of those who never pretended to care about “diversity”?

I am not against the world living in peace.
I am not against friendship between nations.
I am not against human kindness.

I am against the deliberate destruction of the only homes we have.

A rational human being understands a simple truth:

First, a people must be secure in their own land.
First, a nation must protect its own children.
Only then can it offer genuine friendship to others.

You cannot share what you no longer possess.
You cannot welcome the world when your own house is on fire.

So I say this with all the force of my heart:

Defend your people.
Defend your culture.
Defend your future.

Not because you hate others —
but because you still love yourselves enough to survive.

That is not extremism.
That is not hatred.
That is the most basic, most human form of love there is.

And if we lose the courage to say it…
then we will lose everything else as well.

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

I am willing to refer to a self-identified trans woman as such if she is willing to do one specific thing:
A full castration of his full genitalia. Carry around documentation that you are a eunuch. That indicates a full commitment.

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@PatrickWCutler Does it? I thought it was “Woke”.

[Thrilla the Gorilla @ThrillaRilla369]

I can’t believe it. All my childhood punishments have become my adult goals.
• Eating vegetables
• Staying home
• Having a nap
• Going to bed early

[Dr. Jack Wheeler @DRJWheeler27045]

THE ANTIDOTE TO SUICIDAL EMPATHY FOUND IN CEUTA

Numerous reports confirm that by last night: “More Than 48,000 Migrants Return To Morocco from Ceuta” (cf. NY Times, Reuters, France 24 etc.) What happened? Anti-suicidal antipathy, the antidote to suicidal empathy, that’s what.

What happened exactly? They got hungry, nobody fed them. All markets and restaurants were closed. They had to sleep in the streets on asphalt and concrete, nobody tented or housed them. They had no clothes, many not even a shirt, no blankets, nobody gave them anything. They were not welcome, they got anti-suicidal antipathy, not suicidal empathy. The local Ceuta residents universally told them, “Get the eff out of here, go back to where you belong!”

And so they did. Is there a lesson here? Ya think?? Don’t feed them, house them, clothe them, don’t give them free phones and credit cards, don’t give them a damn thing and poof! They self-deport, all by themselves. Are we learning yet, Europe? Of course, you need police, lots of police for many will turn to crime. Yes, there are millions of them in Spain, France, Italy, Sweden, Ireland, the UK, etc., the problem is orders of magnitude greater than 50K in a place from where they can just walk home to. But the path and strategy is now clear. By this afternoon (Aug 1), a rapidly dwindling few hundred “migrants” are left in Ceuta now.

Are we learning yet, America? All the taxpayer-paid freebies and handouts supplied by the Dems, all the massive fraud allowed by Tampon Tim Walz and other Dems, is part of their cheat-to-win via illegals' fraud-voting – and it all needs to be completely 100% shut down. Team Trump – spearheaded by TreasurySec Bessent – is trying, but efforts need to accelerate from snail speed to warp speed.

No welfare goodies for illegals should be a total winner for citizen-voters. What happened in Ceuta today must be a lesson put into immediate practice by Team Trump in America, and in Europe starting with the Spanish evicting Sanchez from power. Ceuta should be the tipping point for Western Civilization regaining moral common sense.

[America Pulse News @AmericaPulseNew]

🚨SOPHIE CUNNINGHAM TELLS LEBRON JAMES TO STAY OUT OF IT: “FLOPPY SHOULD STAY OUT OF IT. HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CORRECT GENITALIA TO HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS!”

She is not backing down.

WNBA star Sophie Cunningham responded to LeBron James calling her stance on men in women’s sports “sad and disappointing” with pure fire. Cunningham said she “couldn’t care less” what James thinks and told Sports Illustrated: “Floppy should stay out of it. He doesn’t have the correct genitalia to have an opinion on this.”

When reminded that James was disappointed, she added: “So is the fact that he won’t retire, but you don’t see me complaining.”

While the biggest name in the NBA tries to lecture female athletes about their own sports and locker rooms, Cunningham is refusing to apologize for telling the truth.

One of the only players in professional sports still willing to say what everyone else is thinking.

@AmericaPulseNew

Share this everywhere so every athlete still staying silent sees what real courage looks like!

[Michelle Maxwell ™ @MichelleMaxwell]

For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about:

🚨So here's the REAL story:

Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.

Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in
Qatar by the CIA.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.

It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!

THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.

Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.

Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.

So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.

Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

61 years ago today, the Tenth Amendment was cut out of the Constitution.

Not through Article V. Not by two-thirds of both chambers and three-fourths of the state legislatures. Not by the process the Founders wrote down in plain English precisely so that no generation could quietly help itself to powers it was never handed.

It was cut out because a few people in Washington said so. That is the entire legal theory. That is the whole footnote. And you are on here celebrating the anniversary like a man throwing a birthday party for the iceberg.

Happy anniversary, Senator. Let us read the document you swore an oath to.

THE AMENDMENT NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Twenty-eight words. No asterisk. No exception for programs that poll well. No carve-out for anything a Senator later decides he is proud of. If you can find the health insurance clause in Article I, Section 8, point at it and I will retract every word that follows. I will wait. Take your time, take a flashlight, take a search party, because you are going to need one.

WHAT THE MEN WHO WROTE IT ACTUALLY SAID

Madison, Federalist No. 45: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." He goes on to specify that the federal powers concern war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce, while the states retain everything touching "the lives, liberties, and properties of the people." Not ambiguous. Not poetry. A man does not write "few and defined" when he means "whatever Congress feels like on a Thursday."

Madison, Federalist No. 39: the federal jurisdiction "extends to certain enumerated objects only, and leaves to the several States a residuary and inviolable sovereignty over all other objects." Inviolable. That word had a meaning before your caucus got hold of it and beat it dead as four o'clock.

Hamilton, Federalist No. 32: the states "clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, exclusively delegated to the United States." Hamilton was the most nationalist man in the room. The FEDERALIST. And even he drew the line here, which ought to tell you something, though I suspect it will bounce off like rain off a tin roof.

Hamilton, Federalist No. 17, and I want this one framed: local concerns, "which are proper to be provided for by local legislation, can never be desirable cares of a general jurisdiction." Hamilton's argument was that Washington would never even WANT these powers. He could not conceive of a Congress grasping enough to try. He never met your caucus. Poor man had a mind like a steel trap and no imagination for what would come crawling out of it.

BUT THE GENERAL WELFARE CLAUSE, YOU SAY

Every time. Like clockwork. So let us go to the man who wrote it.

Madison, Federalist No. 41, addressing this exact misreading: "For what purpose could the enumeration of particular powers be inserted, if these and all others were meant to be included in the preceding general power?" He called the expansive reading an absurdity. His word. If "general welfare" meant anything Congress wants, why list the powers at all? Why not one sentence and adjourn? Reading it your way makes Article I about as useful as a chocolate teapot in a heatwave.

Hamilton, Federalist No. 33, on the Necessary and Proper Clause, since that is usually the next stop: acts of the federal government "which are not pursuant to its constitutional powers" are "merely acts of usurpation, and will deserve to be treated as such." Usurpation. Hamilton's word, not mine. He is describing exactly what happened on July 30, 1965, and you are out here selling it like a timeshare.

Madison, Federalist No. 51: dividing power between two distinct governments means "a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other." That security is the thing you dismantled. Hamilton made the same argument in Federalist No. 28, calling the state governments the people's check against federal overreach. You did not repeal that structure. You just walked past it whistling, the way a man walks past a fire alarm he does not feel like explaining.

Hamilton, Federalist No. 78: "No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid." And Madison in Federalist No. 44, on what happens when Congress usurps: "in the last resort a remedy must be obtained from the people, who can, by the election of more faithful representatives, annul the acts of the usurpers." The Founders gave us a fix. It is called an election. Consider this post a modest contribution to that project.

THERE WAS A LEGAL WAY TO DO THIS

Article V. It is right there. Amend the Constitution, grant the federal government the health care power honestly, and let three-fourths of the states ratify it. Slow, hard, and legitimate. Nobody even tried, because everyone involved knew it would not pass, and a snollygoster never asks a question he already knows the answer to.

So what is next, Senator? Congress simply declares that a power it was never granted is now permanent, untouchable, and beyond question, and anyone who reads the enumerated powers out loud is accused of attacking grandma... wait. I am being told that already happened. Sixty-one years ago today. You just posted about it.

NOW THE RESULTS, BECAUSE I TEACH SCIENCE AND SCIENCE CHECKS OUTCOMES

In 1967 the House Ways and Means Committee projected the entire Medicare program would cost about $12 billion by 1990. Actual 1990 spending: roughly $110 billion. They missed by a factor of nine. If common sense were gasoline, that committee could not have powered a lawnmower.

Medicaid did worse, and it did it faster. Congress estimated $238 million in the first year. It came in over $1 billion. Four times the projection before the ink was dry, and everyone kept their job, because in that building failure is a resume item.

The 2026 Trustees Report, released June 9 of this year: the Hospital Insurance trust fund goes insolvent in the second quarter of 2033. Seven years. At that point the law triggers an automatic 11 percent cut, growing toward 16 percent by 2040. The report also notes the outlook got WORSE than last year, with the shortfall growing by a third. You are "proud to keep fighting" for a program your own trustees say hits the wall while you are still in office. That is not fighting for it, Senator. That is standing on the tracks with a stopwatch.

Improper payments, fiscal year 2025, per GAO: $57 billion in Medicare, $37 billion in Medicaid. Ninety-four billion dollars gone in a single year out of two programs, which is more than the entire GDP of most countries on earth. And whenever anyone proposes actually auditing it, your side treats the auditor like he broke into the house. Why is that? What exactly turns up when somebody opens the books? Nobody fights this hard to protect a filing cabinet full of nothing.

Medicare and Medicaid combined now run past $1.5 TRILLION a year. Let me put that in units a classroom can hold. Stack $1.5 trillion in one-dollar bills and the pile reaches about 102,000 MILES HIGH. That is 408 TIMES TALLER THAN MOUNT EVEREST and better than a third of the way to the moon. Lay those bills end to end and they wrap the EARTH'S EQUATOR 5,884 TIMES. Divided out, that is $18,750 per taxpayer, every year, for two programs the Constitution never authorized. And your position is that the number is not big enough yet.

Madison, Federalist No. 62, and this is the one that should sting: "It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood." Medicare regulations and guidance now run to tens of thousands of pages. Madison predicted your career in 1788, which is more foresight than your caucus has shown in fifty years.

FIFTY YEARS, SENATOR

You arrived in Congress in 1976. Fifty years. Half a century in the same building.

So the only question that actually matters: what have you DELIVERED? Not fought for. Not stood with. Not released a statement about. Delivered. Because a program you did not create, that predates your arrival by eleven years, that is scheduled to go insolvent in seven, is not an accomplishment. It is an inheritance you are running into the ground while posting anniversary photos. You campaign like a rockstar and govern like a participation trophy.

And here is the harder question, the one nobody in your press shop will let you answer. If the entire offer to the American people is another program, another benefit, another check, another dependency, then what you are actually building is not a safety net. It is a constituency that cannot afford to vote against you. Every political machine that ever needed a permanent underclass called it something noble. The antebellum South called it care. You call it compassion. Same architecture, better branding, and the people trapped in it are not clients. They are collateral.

THE PART ABOUT PREMIUMS, SINCE YOU BROUGHT UP CARE VERSUS CATASTROPHE

The enhanced ACA subsidies were written as TEMPORARY in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, then extended as TEMPORARY in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. NOT ONE Republican voted for either bill. You voted for BOTH, @SenMarkey. You wrote the expiration date. Then your party shut the government down for 43 days demanding you be saved from your own calendar, which is a level of self-inflicted that deserves its own chapter.

And read what that fight actually confessed. If a law called the AFFORDABLE Care Act stops being affordable the moment emergency pandemic cash runs out, then the law does not work, and the temporary money was the only thing hiding it. The new CR passed. The government is open. That admission is still sitting in the record, and no amount of anniversary posting is going to buff it out.

Translated for the cheap seats: "Last December my boss handed me a $1,000 bonus. This December he did not. Therefore he cut my pay and he is a monster." Walk that into any HR office in Massachusetts and see how far you get. As an argument it is about as useful as a screen door on a spaceship.

So here is the question I actually want answered. Why are YOU the loudest defender of routing every American through a government-guaranteed insurance conglomerate, instead of expanding Health Savings Accounts and real price transparency, where the patient holds the dollar and providers have to compete for it? Your side lit candles for Luigi Mangione over his hatred of that industry. Now you are its most reliable revenue stream. Pick a lane, because right now you are riding the median with the hazards on.

QUINN'S LAWS, SINCE THEY KEEP DOING MY HOMEWORK FOR ME

Quinn's First Law of Liberalism: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. Sold as security for seniors, delivered as a trust fund with a seven-year fuse. Sold as care for the poor, delivered as $94 billion a year in payments nobody can account for. The Law does not care about anyone's intentions, and neither does an actuary.

Quinn's Sixth Law: facts are the enemy of liberalism. Nothing in this post is contested. Trustees Report, GAO, the Congressional Record, and the Federalist Papers. Every one of them public, free, and apparently unread. I am glad you are not letting education get in the way of your ignorance.

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, JANUARY 10, 1963

Rep. A.S. Herlong Jr. read 45 Communist Goals into the permanent record. Goal 29: discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate and out of step with modern needs. Goal 30: discredit the Founding Fathers as selfish aristocrats with no concern for the common man. Goal 32: support any socialist movement giving centralized control over social agencies and welfare programs.

I am not calling anybody a communist. I am a science teacher. I do not grade intentions, I grade outcomes, and when the outcome column matches a plan read aloud in Congress sixty-three years ago, I am obligated to say so out loud. A mountebank sells the intention. A scientist checks the result.

WHAT THIS ACTUALLY COST

The Founders did not build federalism because they hated helping people. They built it because power close to home can be fired, and power in a marble building four hundred miles away cannot. Massachusetts could have built any health program its citizens voted for, funded it, adjusted it, and answered for it. Fifty states, fifty experiments, and every one of them accountable at a town meeting. Instead we got one program, one set of rules, one Washington, and one number that only ever moves in one direction.

America was founded by geniuses and is being run by people who have never once read the thing they swore to defend. That is not an insult, Senator. It is a job performance review, and I have been writing those for teenagers long enough to know the difference.

But what do I know. I am only a high school science teacher who reads the enumerated powers before celebrating what got done around them.

IF you agree:
LIKE this so the algorithm shows it to the people who need to read it.
SHARE it.
COMMENT below and quote me the clause in Article I, Section 8 that authorizes federal health insurance. Chapter and verse. I will wait right here.

And if you want more of this, the data, the history, the science, the receipts, JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.

@SenMarkey @TPUSA @TPAction @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar

#MAGA #Veterans #Trump

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@LangmanVince I don’t get the impression that they spend a lot of time with balls.

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

😂😂😂😂😂

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Earth is still bound to the Late Cenozoic Ice Age, and our planet's average global temperature still hovers around a very livable 15°C.

This is far below the world's long-term planetary average of 18°C to 24°C - seen throughout most of Earth's biological history. It makes the idea of a global warming crisis seem out of sync with reality.

Despite four decades of continuous climate alarmism, roughly 10% of the Earth's total land area remains permanently capped by glacial ice, which covers 15 million square kilometers (5.8 million square miles).

That is nearly a third of its extent during the peak of the Last Glacial Maximum (26,000 to 19,000 years ago), when continental ice sheets reached their historical zenith.

The Antarctic ice sheet remains the largest and thickest body of ice on the planet, extending up to 4.8 kilometers (about 3 miles) deep. It holds roughly 90% of global ice volume and accounts for 85% of total glacial land cover. Spanning 14 million square kilometers (5.4 million square miles), Antarctica alone makes up 8.3% of Earth's total land surface.

A basic geographical reality is often forgotten: land comprises a mere 28% of the planet's surface. All human cities, towns, and infrastructure combined occupy just 1% to 3% of that land (while deserts take up 33% and forests 31%).

We live on an ocean world, and waters cover 72% of the globe to an average depth of 2.3 miles.

Crucially, the oceans hold 86% of the global carbon reservoir and absorb over 90% of retained thermal energy. By contrast, the atmosphere holds a fraction of a percent of each. The oceans—not human industrial activity—serve as the true long-term regulatory engine for atmospheric carbon dioxide and global climate stability.

The current Quaternary Glaciation is part of an ice age cycle that began 34 million years ago with the thermal isolation and glaciation of Antarctica, later intensified by the closure of the Isthmus of Panama and orbital variations (Milankovitch cycles).

Carbon dioxide was not the driver of these immense shifts.

All of human civilisation, agriculture and technological progress has unfolded within a brief, warm respite: the Holocene interglacial period, which began just 11,700 years ago.

Yet for 40 years, the narrative has been dominated by a campaign driven by an unaccountable bureaucratic authority—the United Nations—pushing an agenda of global control.

The promised catastrophe of runaway, unprecedented warming never arrived.

[Stacy is Right @PoliticalStacy]

I'm old enough to remember when everybody was MAGA.

Bill Clinton 1993: "We have to end welfare as a way of life and make it a path to independence and dignity."

Barack Obama 2005: "We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected undocumented unchecked and go around our communities without our knowledge of them."

Hillary Clinton 2008: "If they've committed a crime deport them. No questions asked. They're gone."

Chuck Schumer 2009: "Illegal immigration is wrong plain and simple."

Joe Biden 2006: "I voted for a fence. I voted for 700 miles of fence."

Harry Reid 1993: "No sane country would grant citizenship to children of illegal immigrants."

Bernie Sanders 2015: "Open borders is a Koch brothers proposal that would make everybody in America poorer."

The Secure Fence Act of 2006 had yes votes from Obama, Hillary, Schumer and Biden.

Don't you dare allow them to gaslight you into thinking your values are racist and radical. These used to be mainstream Democrat positions.

They only changed their minds once their party decided to use illegals to steal power from the American people.

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@Hot_Pepper76 I Want You to Want Me. The live version

[Old Salty Marine @BamaSaltyMarine]

TOP 10 TIMES IN HISTORY WHEN SAYING "FUCK" WAS APPROPRIATE..

What the fuck was that?"
~ Mayor of Hiroshima, August 1945

“Where did all these fucking kodians come from?"
~Custer 1877

“Any fucking idiot could understand that."
~Einstein, 1938

“It does SO fucking look like her!"
~Picasso, 1926

"How the fuck did you work that out?" ~Pythagoras, 126 B.C.

"You want what on the fucking ceiling?"
~Michelangelo, 1566

"I don't suppose it's going to fucking rain?"
~Joan of Arc, 1434

"Scattered fucking showers... my ass!"
~Noah, 314 B.C.

“I need this parade like I need a fucking hole in the head!"
~JFK, 1963

"Aw c'mon, who the fuck is going to find out?"
~Bill Clinton, 1997

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@fOx1257067 The background scream is real, I hear it every time,

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

@Grey_0G @data_republican Godspeed.

[Larry Jones @RareNYGOP]

https://t.co/0Mld5p0cc6