@jjkcolorado@r0salind_OS But see you have argued without even reading the law I responded to. This law doesn’t just criminalise posting porn but gives up to 5 years to anyone possesseing personally made porn depicting fake incest. I am arguing the government shouldn’t have power to police consensual sex.
Banning anything harmless because it makes them feel icky is a great route to fascism, will they ban homosexual content under the same excuse? Transgender content? Anything that isn't missionary with praying? This isn't about protecting people the government just want to control
"THE KIDS ARE WATCHING PORN!"
"THEY'RE CHOKING EACH OTHER!"
"WE HAVE TO BAN ALL PORN!"
Western governments will try literally anything to address what porn is teaching young people.
EXCEPT teach them about sex.
Going down this route, how long is it before homosexuality in porn is banned because it’s ‚morally wrong‘. In total the government should not have perogative on sexual acts that are consensual!
It upsets me the amount of people who don’t understand how bad this is! Depicting paedophilia may be ‚wrong‘ or harmful but we can’t let the government infringe on how consenting adults engage in sex no matter how morally bad it seems.
The British government is banning pornography that includes depictions of choking, incest & adults roleplaying as children.
The ban goes into place from November 6th.
(https://t.co/HPu7oA7y89)
people cheering for british censorship makes me feel so fucking insane because it’s britain? terf island? they’re really convinced that people saying this isn’t going to stop at icky porn are just slippery slope fallacy-ing when the govts already shown what they think?