Raver135

Chief Operating Officer of Agent Mimi AI with us to the future of financial investment.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

And if you ask Fable 5 to perform a deep analysis of the circulating supply of RIO, here is the answer you will get:

I ran an on-chain audit of $RIO supply across all chains (July 2, 2026). The aggregators can't agree — CMC says 162M circulating, KuCoin 147M, CoinGecko 100M, Coinpaprika 71M. So I read the contracts directly.

On-chain totalSupply today:
• BSC: 156.6M
• Ethereum: 69.8M
• Realio L1 (native ario): ~85.4M
• Solana: ~2M
• Base: 2M (subset of ETH — canonical bridge, not additive)
• Algorand legacy: 100M issued, 43.8M still in the issuer reserve

EVM alone = 226.4M. That already exceeds the stated 175M cap by ~29%.

Why? MAX_SUPPLY = 175M is a constant inside each contract separately. Nothing on-chain enforces a global sum. The bridge is pure mint/burn (no escrow — verified in the realio-network source), and the minter on both EVM chains is one 2-of-2 multisig holding MINTER_ROLE + ADMIN.

One new data point: BSC supply actually dropped ~1M since June 22 — first net burn I've observed. The bridge works both ways. But the total minted across chains is ~314M+, roughly double the declared cap.

Top BSC holders aren't treasury or bridge locks — they're CEX hot wallets (KuCoin, MEXC, OKX: 65M+ in the top 12 alone). That's liquid float by definition.

My takeaway: the real tradeable float is closer to ~226M than the reported 147.7M, so the market cap you see on aggregators is understated by roughly a third. Not alleging bad intent — but the 175M "cap" is an off-chain promise, not an on-chain guarantee. DYOR accordingly.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

I've been a holder long enough to know that this question has never been answered by anyone. The entire community, including the admins of the Telegram group, can only estimate the circulating supply, with guesses ranging from 100 to 150 million. Yet according to the Realio Network explorer, there shouldn't be more than about 85 million in circulation today.

The CEO doesn't even respond to those estimates. He just keeps repeating the same line, that asking this question is simply a sign of a bear market.

Do you understand that by doing this, you're helping the project drown in speculation that is slowly killing it?

I know you want to stay on good terms with the clique that silences and bans anyone who asks questions in the Telegram group, but here on X, their admin privileges are worthless.

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@ELADENTBOY 8 meses. En estos 8 meses han destrozado cualquier confianza que se podía tener. No lo han podido hacer peor.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

A single official statement from the team could put all of these questions to rest, allowing $RIO to begin its journey toward the top of the RWA sector.

Instead, they keep repeating the same talking points about the bear market and paper hands.

I understand that they may be afraid to tell the truth. But whatever that truth is, $RIO could eventually recover from it. What it may never recover from is this ongoing silence and lack of transparency, which fuels endless speculation and creates so much confusion that it risks permanently damaging the project's credibility.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

I'm addressing the part of the @realio_network community that is capable of critical thinking and genuinely wants to see $RIO return to the forefront of the RWA sector.

Don't let yourselves be intimidated by the five or six bullies in the community group, including its two admins. Demand a transparent answer from the team to one simple question: How many $RIO tokens are actually in circulation across all networks?

Without this information, we cannot expect the public to regain confidence in the project, no matter how many RWAs the team tokenizes.

Speak up and keep asking questions, even if the admins attack you or their followers accuse you of spreading bear FUD. In the end, you'll be helping the project and yourselves.

Make $RIO great again.

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

Estos son mis ideales. Si no le gustan, tengo otros ✅

[Luisito Analista 👀 @luisitosmc]

|SALSEO🚨|
Ester Expósito responde a todas las críticas respecto a su visita a La Casita del artista BadBunny:

"Lo que molesta es que las mujeres habitemos espacios de contradicción y que seamos feministas, combativas y críticas, pero que también tengamos derecho a perrear, a gozar y a gestionar nuestro placer como nos dé la gana"

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@Dennisraging IYKYK 🤣🤣

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

Esto es lo que decía en CEO de $RIO en diciembre del año pasado. Pues bueno, el precio ya está por debajo de los 0.03 céntimos. Esperando con ansias que compré todo el suministro. 🤣🤣🤣

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@real2023Oz IYKYK 🤣🤣

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@Cryptech_Sam IYKYK 🤣🤣

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@unclejoopert @realio_network Por no hablar de como se silencian a las personas que cuestionan las cosas de forma constructiva en los grupos de Telegram. Todo muy alentador. Seguramente refuerza la confianza de los inversores.👌

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@unclejoopert @realio_network Que me dices de las declaraciones del CEO en diciembre? Por poner algunos ejemplos de las mentiras que se han ido diciendo en los últimos 7/8 meses.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

Be genuinely careful with anything these 👇 two admins share or recommend. In the channel they administer, they are inciting individuals against those who ask legitimate questions and encouraging attacks from a few members against the rest of the community.

It is clear that their interest is manipulation and obscuring the facts. Once again, be careful.

[Risk-Taker @imshaharyar]

@AhmedRafie02 @kucoincom @MEXC @realio_network @freehold_wallet We will definitely see $RIO at 0.01.. No matter what... Influencers who are continuously shilling $RIO have blocked me like JA... But truth is that $RIO team has increased its supply and dumping RIO...

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

This is how the Realio admin responds to legitimate questions about the total circulating supply of RIO. Anyone who asks is mocked for “complaining,” their posts are deleted, and they get banned.

This is the true face of him and the other admin mentioned in my post above.

[ELADENTBOY @ELADENTBOY]

I would like to point out some very suspicious behavior by the admins @ja1405_ja and @0xBarry_03 of the @realio_network community group on Telegram. They are apparently hiding something regarding the total circulating supply of $RIO and are banning anyone who asks about it.

I have supported the project tirelessly for many years, as can be seen from my posts, but I have a feeling that something strange is really going on.

Please be cautious regarding posts from these individuals.

[Cryptech Sam @Cryptech_Sam]

I have been following this self-claimed #RWA shit $RIO since the start, thinking to buy and hold, but it kept getting worse & worse.

1st total supply was 55M

Then it went to 57M

Then supply jumped to 75M

Then, through validator migration and 3rd-party voting, a migration was announced with 175M total supply of $RIO, unlocking over 37 years.

But here's the interesting surprise:

In just 1.5 years, 167M supply is already in circulation.

So you should ask @derekboirun whether he lied to you?

Is this drastic increase in supply the reason $RIO dumped 60% in a month and around 90% in a year?

Or does he think he can dump on you and run? 😂😂

In Simple word you are paying Derek the Dick Luxury bills.

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@GxlDeFekir Jugar si, tocar los cojones a los demás, no. Sé de lo que hablo.

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@mr_angelote Al irse el listillo que me había llenado de tierra, se le ocurrió lanzarme otro puñado de arena, mientras estaba tirado boca abajo tomando el sol, para salir corriendo acto seguido. Poco me parece la multa.

[Raver135 @Raver_135]

@mr_angelote Escapó y me llenó la cabeza y la toalla de arena. Creéis que pidió disculpas? Les dije que se fueran a jugar más alejados porque era evidente que no iban a tener cuidado. La respuesta? Seguir jugando y pasándome la pelota por al lado en repetidas ocasiones. No contentos con ello+