@bcherny Hi Boris!
Sorry to bother on Christmas, but PDF support is quite lackluster when CC/Claude Agent SDK is used with AWS bedrock models instead of Anthropic APIs directly.
IMO, This hinders the dream of using CC as a "general" agent on enterprise data.
https://t.co/MNu9FseTEk
Claude Code is personal AGI. You can't use this thing for more than a weekend without realizing it's completely over. At first you make a GUI app, OK cool. Then you're like wait, GUIs are a waste of time, let's just make a terminal app. Then you're like wait APPS are a drag, what if I just ask Claude Code to do the thing directly? Works immediately. Then you're like damn, now asking Claude Code to do stuff feels like a drag, can I... have Claude make a system that says this stuff for me, in the order I've been saying it, for the reasons I've been saying it? Maybe it can do all my tab changing and clicking too? And you really think you're going to break it by asking for something ridiculous, and then even this works, and that's when you realize.... It's over. Claude is now building you an agent system, and it works. Recursively self-improving machine intelligence, today, on your laptop. An agent system building you a custom agent system which gets better simply by using it (and lightly nudging it to improve based on what was learned in the session). I was bearish on Agents for a while. Not anymore. I'm talking home-cooked retard agents. My wife surely thinks I've lost it once and for all. You have to actually pull yourself away because every attempt to find its limit fails to hit any limit. It's not even 'addictive', it's just not believable that the next crazy idea could also work. And then it works and you're like f*ck... It's over.
@mitsuhiko My caveman method is asking the agent to clone the libraries I need it to be familiar with to a gitignored subdirectory and generate an https://t.co/NcdhdKviM2 acting as a TOC for followup sessions. Works much better than context7.
@simonw Skills should be the next MCP primitive (after tools, resources and prompts) which teaches the LLM to get the best out of the tools at runtime. Much better than the half-baked `serverInstructions`.
Has there been any actual research done on whether Spec-Driven Development (SDD) works better over standard iterative prompting with a coding agent?
Some of the so called "specifications" outputted by popular frameworks just feel like poisonous context salad to me.