"We already knew’ is not a defense. If everyone already knew, then the failure is worse: the problem was visible for years and meaningful protection still did not follow. A few successful lawsuits prove survival is possible; they do not prove the system is protective.
@Ray_V10 whole bunch of buzzwords when we already knew how kpop contracts work and many in the past were able to get out when their was real mistreatment
Or maybe that the category might have been an honest attempt at broader Asian representation and could potentially help many non–K-pop Asian artists gain recognition at the Grammys.
this is why they’re mad. that category that they made for THEIR favorite groups, they just wanted to put sm and kakao groups in this category and now it’s ruined bc bts exposed the part that it’s racist. so now it’s looks terrible if these groups are even submitted.
@lillitiesy Their own ceo said the group was inspired from nj, and paying homage to nj when that same agency was caught stealing nj plans and it's was in courts with witness and all.
So stay mad that ur copycat group won't ever leave the nj shadow.
Bcoz thieves can't create.
@THEOGWHITEMAMBA The case served as a catalyst that exposed unresolved structural questions about worker status, contractual fairness, dependency on agencies, and the adequacy of legal protections for idols and trainees in S.Korea’s entertainment industry.
Ur dumbass won't be moved we know 😂
@lovethve Ruined k-pop 😂
Bro people have fought against similar outfit which has led an agency to issue an apology and deleted the content.
Here the plans for the groups were stolen, nj is on their moodboard till now.
And yet somehow those copycats r victim and their thief agency is good