The Bible, Roman, Germanic history shows you what every Semitic desert sheikh knows; every other chief is out to kill you and fuck your wife
Will you believe record of known history and presentday evidence of femael behavior, or supposed data from Quora “genetics” commentary
The modern world suffers from a regrettable poverty of militarism. Nobody is militarised, and nobody seems even faintly ashamed of the fact. Western society, in particular, looks like a fellow loafing about in carpet slippers looking for his spectacles, strolling aimlessly through life with his hands in his pockets, chewing bubblegum, playing at billiards, untucking his shirt, slouching, waddling, and acting as if Discipline had been abolished centuries ago.
If I were entrusted with the requisite power, it would not be this way at all.
I should begin with the young men. I'd take them marching at once; I would seize them, as it were, by their throats, set them all on their feet, & have them all thoroughly militarised before they had time to raise an objection.
Having completed that crucial task, I'd proceed to the rest of the population. I'd have schoolchildren marching, women marching, elderly aunts marching, barristers marching, schoolmistresses marching, cabinet ministers marching, magistrates marching.
I want to look out the window and see every single man, woman, & child marching from one place to another, with the look of persons engaged on some mission of national importance, each wearing the visible expression of someone who has received a clear command & is actively executing it with maximum efficiency.
And I want to see that expession not merely now & then, nor even frequently, but uniformly and permanently, in 100% of the popluation, 100% of the time.
Nor should I confine myself to people.
I'd militarise our values, institutions, manners, morals, customs. I want every word to know its duty, every sentiment to stand to attention, & every belief to present arms.
Above all, I want every leader, every public authority, every member of parliament, every head of state to give the impression that he has recently slept in a barracks & eaten breakfast from a tin plate.
The sort of Caucasian women who regard extravagant cosmetic enlargement of the lips as an improvement tend to be rather whiggerly in their cultural enthusiasms. Americans often speak as if beauty standards operate in only one direction, with women of all races altering their appearance to resemble Caucasians, but in America I see more of the opposite phenomenon.
I see plenty of women determined to remodel themselves in the image oft hat altogether different and rather mysterious tribe: I refer, of course, to the American Negro. A tribe regarded n some quarters with extravagant suspicion, and, in others quarters, with an admiration equally extravagent, though they have always struck me as perfectly commonplace people. Mind, I've only ever known one Negro in my entire life——a childhood friend fresh from the jungles of Rhodesia——and I've only ever seen perhaps a dozen or so in my entire life.
I use the term Negro because that is what the rest of the world calls this tribe. The insistence on "Afro-American" is a peculiarity of the Americans, and we outsiders are not in the least obliged to adopt it.
As for 'Blacks': well, if you insist on that term, then you ought, if anything, to be gratified: for the rest of the world has already gone to the trouble of calling them blacks: namely, 'Negroes'. For the two words mean prefisely the same thing. Seems churlish to demand a synonym merely because the original word, for no particular reason, has become unfashionable to Americans.
One seldom sees the Negro outside of the cinema. Yet, for some reason, large numbers of American women seem determined to resemble them.
I see skin dakened, lips exaggerated, proportions revised, and the whole Caucasoidal countenance subjected to a curious programme of continual reconstruction.
The phenomenon becomes rather less mysterious when one observes that these women are all "Whiggers", though "Whegroes" strikes me as an altogether more civilised designation.
(The above remarks ,admittedly, are a bit of disconnected ramble, but it flows well enough for me, and i am disinclined to temper with it.)
Babies are not soulless, but the soul of a baby does not immediately take up residence in the body. For the first few weeks, it merely hovers in the vicinity, connected by a sort of spiritual umbilical cord. It watches things and decides whether it enjoys its mother and father sufficiently to commit itself. Only when it has grown genuinely fond of the arrangement does it finally enter the body.
How do I know this? I can only say that certain mysteries have, from time to time, been revealed to me
I hear money as explanation…would be bad enough but I think it’s worse. Normally eg tech billionaires don’t get w*men like this
Imo this isn’t good; suspect these men are in some kind of humiliating situation (gril bring w you because she fears men or sees you as pet is bad)
@bronzeagemantis >tigers in captivity refuse to breed because they hate being watched
What this mean in reference to ubiquity of surveillance cameras and iPhones in human life? Has this been spoken on before or elsewhere?
>uhhh listen “Mr” “President” i actually traveled all the way to *wisconsin* for this interview, you can’t just, like, leave
hoeflation in america is so out of control that this roastie thinks her time is more valuable than the president of the united states
Caribbean Rhythms RETURN SLAM episode 217 megavariety on artificial intelligence debates, "Pope" Prevost AI decrees, spanking and Downs' abortion conflict; w*men on the verge of nervous breakdowns
free 45 minutes, SUBSCRIBE for full 1 hour 30 minute show: https://t.co/DTX8x145bM
The bar for what it takes to whitepill me is so absurdly low now. It used to be like “fell in love”
Now it’s like, “had zero gay thoughts for 24h, whitepilled !!”