@PapaGlutton@CoryInTheCrypto@royalserf Yea fuck the 1st amendment. You are a coward for this statement alone. Lets let the majority determine what i can say.
@PapaGlutton@royalserf And yes, he was attacked thank you. I don’t know why you had to mention. No marks on his face as if that means something at the moment.
@PapaGlutton@royalserf You may be very well right or wrong g about provoking. Facts havent come out yet. That still doesnr make self defense not possible
@PapaGlutton@royalserf And facts may still come out to make self defense not applicable. Until then we have to rely on audio and witnesses to the stream’s perspective.
@PapaGlutton@royalserf Self defense law doesn’t require someone to wait until they’re unconscious or staring at a gun. A sucker punch and continued assault on pavement can absolutely justify fearing serious bodily harm. Also “no marks on his face” means nothing. He was obviously attacked.
@PapaGlutton@royalserf A punch to the head can lead to your head hitting the pavement. Which can be deadly in some cases. Words legally don’t justify violence. Therefore he was assaulted and feared seriously bodily harm. If this wasnt a mutual fight, id say self defense, Therefore justified shooting.
@concretegrammie@PBDsPodcast I think I have a hunch on what killed him, message me if you want to know. I don’t want to put it out there publicly else they may try and silence me