When I look at the work of @steven_kotler and the broader FLOW literature, one thing stands out.
Flow often appears at the edge of growth.
The challenge-skill boundary.
The problem with trapped executors is that many are no longer operating at the edge of growth.
They’re operating at the edge of capacity.
Those are not the same thing.
Unpopular: AI won't eliminate PM roles.
It will eliminate PMs who confused administration for leadership.
The Gantt chart was always easier than the hard conversation. AI just cleared your excuse.
The PM tasks AI is replacing:
• Status reports
• Schedule tracking
• Risk logs
• Dependency mapping
• Meeting summaries
The PM tasks AI cannot replace:
• Navigating organizational politics
• Managing conflict between stakeholders
• Judgment under genuine ambiguity
• Human trust
Guess which list most PMs have spent their career optimizing for.
PMI projects PM job growth through 2030.
What they won't say: most of today's PMs won't qualify for those roles.
The title survives. The job description doesn't.
The skills floor is rising faster than the profession is adapting.
Growth requires disruption, not suffering.
Disruption can feel like:
Pain
Discomfort
Uncertainty
Pressure
But it can also look like:
Curiosity
Challenge
Engagement
Voluntary strain (training, learning, building)
Execution doesn't lead to promotion.
It leads to more execution.
The PMs who get the leadership roles aren't the ones who delivered the most.
They're the ones who were in the room before the project existed.
Nobody teaches PMPs how to get in that room.
That's what I do.
Link in bio.
Day off. Onsite. ‘Leadership retreat’ on the 5 Dysfunctions of a Team.
We did the exercises, voted on our top priority like good little collaborators.
Sr. Dir: ‘No. Here’s what the priority actually is…’ (the one he decided weeks ago).
Nothing says ‘I’m a servant leader who builds trust’ quite like hijacking the entire trust exercise you scheduled on everyone’s day off.
The paradox holds: declare it, and you’ve already lost it.
This wasn’t leadership. It was performance art with a veto button.
Nothing screams 'don't trust me' quite like someone saying 'trust me.'
And 'servant leader'? Please.
That's the participation trophy of modern management.
Real leadership is rare and usually quiet. The people loudly advertising their servant hearts are typically the ones who need the title to compensate for the fact that no one would follow them otherwise.
These phrases share the same fatal paradox as calling yourself "cool" or "classy": the moment you have to declare it, you've already lost it.
We've turned leadership into performance art. The script is predictable, the sincerity is optional, and the body count of burned-out teams keeps rising.
Maybe try this radical idea: shut up about what kind of leader you are, and let your demonstration, your standards, and your results do the talking for once.
CALLING ALL PMPs! I need your help.
I’ve been working on an industry briefing for PMPs who consistently deliver but aren’t advancing. (Tragic, I know)
It’s not about improving execution.
It’s about understanding why strong delivery often doesn’t translate into leadership opportunities.
Before I put it behind a paywall, I want to pressure-test the thinking with people who are actually in the role.
What lands. What doesn’t. Where it misses.
If you’re a PMP and open to reviewing it and providing direct, honest feedback, comment "Send it!" and I'll get a copy to you.
Thank you!
CALLING ALL PMPs! I need your help.
I’ve been working on an industry briefing for PMPs who consistently deliver but aren’t advancing. (Tragic, I know)
It’s not about improving execution.
It’s about understanding why strong delivery often doesn’t translate into leadership opportunities.
Before I put it behind a paywall, I want to pressure-test the thinking with people who are actually in the role.
What lands. What doesn’t. Where it misses.
If you’re a PMP and open to reviewing it and providing direct, honest feedback, comment "Send it!" and I'll get a copy to you.
Thank you!
Success introduces a new constraint most people never anticipate.
Abundance.
In environments of scarcity, decisions are forced.
In environments of abundance, decisions become psychological.
The constraint is no longer information.
It becomes interpretation and emotional regulation.
Leaders who cannot separate behavior from identity struggle to process feedback.
Once feedback becomes identity-based, the brain shifts into self-protection mode, and learning stops.
That is one of the subtle ways emotional dysregulation shows up in professional environments.
You: “Yesterday in the meeting you interrupted Sarah several times while she was explaining the data.”
Them: “So now I’m just someone who doesn’t respect people?”
That move converts a specific behavior into a global identity accusation.
The result is predictable: the conversation stops being about improvement.
Here is the sequence I trust:
1. Move your body until the noise drops.
2. Sit down long enough to hear what is real.
3. Make the next decision like a self-respecting man.
That is the work.