@RepBaumgartner@RepBaumgartner wants you to pay more for eveything and wants to put boots on the ground in Iran and endanger even more of your children’s lives.
That’s the tweet
@PNWConservative Except for that tiny problem about the majority of voters and legislators not wanting to do this….you seem to keep forgetting that part but anyone with an above average IQ understands this of course.
@RepBaumgartner You’re party controls Congress and the a presidency and decided to try mid decade redistricting rather than passing a law to ban gerrymandering. Whine more.
@JimWalshLD19 Probably more taxes on the extremely wealthy as their CPAs restructure businesses and find new loopholes and more tax credits for the working class. Would love to see the CCA reformed so all revenue less administrative expense is returned equally to all Washingtonians.
@BoomerDivvies Because while you are right about expectations, the ratio between median home price and median wage skyrocketed. But only low IQs don’t understand this.
@KatieDaviscourt My hometown in Eastern WA was a sundown town until the 60’s meaning African Americans had to leave before sundown and even once that ended they couldn’t buy homes for many more years. History 101
@voteholyk She continually gets elected meaning she actually has over 50% support here in WA so you might be wise to understand that Twitter is now a right wing echo chamber
@PNWConservative You give them a check because they currently pay the highest percentage of income to taxes.
That was easy and only those with low IQs don’t understand.
@TravisSCouture Couldn’t agree more. Republicans will continue to lose statewide elections until their morals improve and better align with the morals of WA voters. Here’s a start:
Paid family and medical leave
Living wage
Affordable healthcare
Affordable childcare
@VietQNguyen lol. The court has changed since 1933 and along with that, the constitutionality of a recently passed uniform 10% tax on all income with an exemption for income less than $1M has not been decided.
@VietQNguyen Correct, so they pass a law, and if it’s challenged, the courts decide. Since they haven’t decided, it’s constitutional until such time the court find otherwise.