Eric A.

We're missionaries in Europe proclaiming The Lord Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today & forever

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

Here are some links to teachings, other social media and donations. https://t.co/WOkFXKdvJq

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@nicksortor treasonous

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MartinSellner_ I agree. And I liked the lead too.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@conservmillen @MoreToSomething no true scotsmen

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@conservmillen where in the bible does it say "things which personally give you the ick are unholy?"

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@sola_chad ironic this post appeals to emotion

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@ggreenwald terrible for real tennis fans

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

A prophet is born a prophet, they don't become "false" because they struggle with sins great or small. The truth of their ministry is measured against the word, not subjective human standards.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff I think what I said is pretty clear

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@marika2me would love to, I've been to the prayer room and One Thing back in the day and was really blessed

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

Here's what people don't like about God, he chooses who he wants. He chose the Jews to bring forth the messiah & we are indebted to them for this (Rom. 15:27.)

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff By this logic, "Caesar was a Roman" is anachronistic—his Rome isn't modern Rome or Italian nationality. Words evolve. So why does only Ioudaios get held to this impossible standard?

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff You moved the goalposts: "no Jews in the OT" → "the term evolved." & "post-Temple hardening" isn't settled consensus—it's your model. Even BDAG's "Judean" gloss is contested, not proof; scholars split. Second Temple Judaism already had cohesive identity pre-70AD.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff Historical revisionist circles want to shoehorn an illogical translation. 'Ioudaios' (Jew) shows up in Philo, Maccabees, & other texts written BEFORE 70AD—describing both ethnic and religious identity. BDAG confirms. Your 'post-Temple invention' claim is just factually wrong

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff yeah, I'm not reading all that, I translated ancient Hebrew for 6 years & taught it in grad school, I know how translation works & "Judean" makes no sense. "Jew" is the only thing that fits.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 Do you understand how translation works? Jew(s) is the overwhelming scholarly consensus for John 4:22 across lexicons & Bibles. Even common sense says that doesn't fit the context. "...for salvation is from the judean." No.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff Do you understand how translation works? Jew(s) remains the overwhelming scholarly and translational consensus for John 4:22 across lexicons, critical editions, and Bibles. Even common sense says that doesn't fit the context. "...for salvation is from the judean." No.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

The farther away the very early church drifted from the truth and expectation of a literal millennial kingdom in Jerusalem the more it slipped into apostasy.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

Reading the OT promises to Israel as allegory is logically absurd.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

Reading the OT promises to Israel as allegory is logically absurd.

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@MulaMule300 @WesleyLHuff Jesus calls himself a Jew in John 4

[Eric A. @RealEric007]

@christopherrufo @GraduatedBen still true though