Finally wrote up my healthcare fix: a Bayesian Medical Guidance System (BMGS) delivered through pharmacies. Handles 70–80% of routine care safely, cheaply, immediately. Have @Walmart pilot this in Idaho and scale.
Here’s the full proposal: https://t.co/OqybKVpAk0
clever chart. it certainly does not serve as a reason to tax wealth. Imagine a world where wealth inequality is much lower - suddenly your argument falls apart.
What should interest you more is rerouting slosh in financialized transactions (e.g. housing, education) away from the assets themselves and towards a productive outcome.
@lthlnkso Another one of those studies that you really didn't need a study for. But now we have justification to change something that certainly isn't going to change.
@PartinGreg@IAmSubjugated@demystifysci I feel like a lattice would be too predictable. A metallic glass can usually support what you want out of a lattice
You can't really say life expectancy is solely an outcome of healthcare when "crushed by cattle" is a cause of death that exists.
You can look at modal age of death and it'd give you a better idea. And women have less noise, but in general, they're all pretty close nominally, not even adjusted for by genetics or anything.
Which leaves us still with why the US healthcare system is so expensive - 1) we financialize healthcare, and 2) we don't prefer scarcity over price. That's just how the tradeoffs are.
What's wrong with the concept of a surface-bound body with an inside and outside is that it doesn't exist in reality. That's a false dichotomy brains use for macroscopic understanding.
That said, conventional physics is ignoring that GR doesn't scale well so you get an FRW model sometimes and another model for intragalactic spacetime. Its the same level of math-model tomfoolery that QM uses, by using probability to get a predictive model even if it's a map and not the territory.
@theWellRedMage I played 1,2,4 all the way through (om the NES). Loved 4 the best.
But I don't have the patience to grind as an adult. If I were in the mood, I'd grind either final fantasy 1 or 7th saga.
Yeah when you get weird, seemingly conflicting results you really need to see the exact wording of the question they asked.
General Social Survey:
"Taken all together, how would you say things are these days--would you say that you are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy?"
(married score high)
vs
The Satisfaction with Life Scale:
"In most ways my life is close to my ideal" (7-point agree-disagree scale)
(single women score high)
I have to conclude that single women's ideal life does not include happiness.
I think that if they had mass paper production and double-entry accounting, and a couple nerdy leaders (like Coke of Norfolk and Farmer King George) they might have been able to industrialize.
In 300 years, they'll say: if they understood how currency systems worked, they might have been able to create a sustainable civilization
@BrianRoemmele nothing interesting in the video happened in 1955. In 1950 salaries look like they dropped but that was because it switches data sources from the IRS (back when poor people didn't file) to the SSA's average wage index.
I'm sure those sky scrapers are filled with people who migrated from high-fertility rural areas to low-fertility cities in search of a better life.
Then they find out it's expensive to live in a city compared to the wages, even though they're much higher compared to rural wages. And marriage, children, get sidelined.