@MistyRaeRouge @herbivore_club The question remains: Does your pet eat other animals...? There simply is no perfect way. It's not the defininition that counts, it's the net result.
@NatalieLanovill@269Justice Nope, in some people's logic there are 31g of protein in 28g of hemp seeds.
jk
Didn't even occur to me that this could be anything other than per 100g.
#Hackfressen: Wollen jetzt die Leute, die #Maskenpflicht als Diktatur beschimpft haben anderen aufdiktieren, dass sieh ihre Maske weglassen sollen, oder habe ich da was falsch verstanden?
@vintagevegans Let's continue this, anyone in Europe eating avocado doesn't care. Anyone who has a baby doesn't care. You will always find people who "care more" than you that will be looking down at you for not caring enough. Statements like this have no benefit.
@MatthiasHauer@FridayForFuture#KulturelleAneignung erinnert mich an Patentrecht. Viele Historiker sind sich einig, dass ein zu langes Patent dem Fortschritt im Wege steht. Will jetzt nicht pauschalisieren, aber bringt uns kultreller Austausch nicht besser vorran, als Verbote? #Maltzahn#FFF
@Schomi7 @StBrandner Wenn mich ein #AfD ler anhustet muss ich nicht fragen ob er krank ist. Ich würde aber gerne wissen ob er auch was ansteckendes hat.
@McBazface@TheYlfa@YoungMarkKN @NothingRllyMtrz You are quoting the very site whose arguments agains fighting over how vegan you can be you reject.
I am not attacking you, your lifestyle, your cats. If you surround yourself with people who think in black and white, even thinking a lot about smth will not get you anywhere.
@McBazface@TheYlfa@YoungMarkKN @NothingRllyMtrz 1. You were surprised about being called holier than thou... There should be no surprise there.
You put the cats' lives above that of the pigs they eat.
Palm oil is vegan for you. It only indirectly kills orang utans.
Fecies are a by-product of exploitation. Need I go on?
@McBazface@TheYlfa@YoungMarkKN @NothingRllyMtrz You are missing the point. There is nothing wrong with having 2 cats. But for some vegans it is, bc. you are buying meat for them. By their definition you are not 100% vegan. There is no such thing. The world has shades for pretty much every aspect.
@McBazface@TheYlfa@YoungMarkKN @NothingRllyMtrz 1. You don't seem to realize how you come across.
3. No, you're max 78.6% vegan.
Thinking about something does not imply you reach the right conclusion.
You are strict on the word "vegan", but rather loose on the word "practical". Np, but please realize, there is a gray area.
@McBazface @Sarah_Websites @NothingRllyMtrz You have your definition, others have theirs. V. society didn't coin the word, it used to be about diet, they changed the meaning in 1947. Really: think about the point you're trying to make. The world is not black and white, I know it's hard, but start thinking in shades. 2/2
@McBazface @Sarah_Websites @NothingRllyMtrz It's a by-product that's based on animals in cages. Many vegans would argue: Palm oil is forbidden, bc. orang utans die for the production. You have cats, if they don't eat meat, it's animal cruelty, if they do, you're promoting cruelty. 100% vegan is not possible.
1/2
@McBazface @Sarah_Websites @NothingRllyMtrz 100% no animal cruelty worldwide is impossible. So why not applaud anyone who truely makes an effort, instead of insisting they are doing (saying) vegan wrong? Reduce animal suffering world-wide, not eliminate it in a few select places.
@McBazface @Sarah_Websites @NothingRllyMtrz Take a breath and think about what you are arguing about. What good is it for the animals if you don't allow 'shades of veganism'. You form an elite club and look down on everybody who slips off from your point of view, you'll have a few true vegans and a lot of angry meat-eaters