![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b0WYAEJBjC.jpg)
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b0WYAAE23k.jpg)
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0bzWAAAbZpz.jpg)
Olivia
Online
MJ ████ ████ Alexander🍊🍊🍊
@RealMJAlexander
Joined January 2017
765 Following
406 Followers
5.5K Posts
@robreiner LOL! Believe this... your twisted definition of "fascist" sux, Meathead.
No, truth is NOT on your side... but FAT is... on your sides, your front and your ass!
We finished the tenth week of our trial against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization.
Donald Trump can keep trying to distract from reality, but it's the truth that matters, and the truth is on our side.⤵️
@POTUS Lies... it's a bunch h of LIES!
Who to follow
Stephen Richer 
@stephen_richer
Republic Affairs | Harvard Kennedy | Cato — I ❤️ diet coke, sports, fantasy books, business, hip hop, air condition, logic puzzles, word games, bread, cats.
Arizona Agenda
@arizonaagenda
The Arizona Agenda is a daily insider publication for political outsiders, run by two longtime local journalists. @TucsonAgenda is our little sister.
MJ ████ ████ Alexander ⭐ 🧡 🍊
@MyTwoSenseWorth
Living for the day when I am judged by my contributions to society rather than my skin, my gender, my religion or my politics. ~ MJ Alexander #COSProject
@YeahThatCindy I read and enjoyed your Thanksgiving article on Duolingo, came here intending to Follow... then I saw the she/elle thing. smh
Air Force base in North Dakota warns airmen not to attend rally featuring pro-Trump Tyler Bower or risk 'jeopardizing' military career.
Our men & women of the Armed Forces fight for our freedoms only to be threatened/ denied by leftist leadership.
This command should start preparing for an Armed Services Committee hearing/ investigation NOW!
@RepJimBanks @mattgaetz @RonnyJacksonTX
https://t.co/E4mUgE261b
🚨BREAKING: @CoryMillsFL reacts to the Air Force in North Dakota warning airmen not to attend a Turning Point Action rally or risk 'jeopardizing' military career, says he will ask Charlie Kirk to testify at a committee hearing on the incident.
“I want Charlie Kirk to come sit with these members, he probably knows more about the Constitution than the commander that made this call”
‘In The Arena’ | @watchTENETnow
Very cool...
How 'bout I drop this instead...💩
Drop a 💙 to show Dean Phillips you’re voting for Joe Biden
THIS... when a Democrat criticizes Biden's policies...
BREAKING: Search warrant shows that prosecutors and the F.B.I. are investigating whether @NYCMayor Eric Adams’s 2021 campaign conspired with Turkey’s government.
NOTE: A raid earlier today at the home of Eric Adams’s chief fund-raiser, Brianna Suggs, was part of an inquiry into whether foreign money was funneled into his mayoral campaign, the warrant shows.
NOTE: To be clear, federal prosecutors and the F.B.I. are conducting a corruption investigation into whether Mayor Eric Adams’s 2021 election campaign conspired with the Turkish government to receive illegal foreign donations.
It's not a matter of "if"...
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”
![kylenabecker's tweet photo. Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'
An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.
The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues.
"Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)."
The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.”
The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings.
It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden.
The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction.
Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed.
It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity.
Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9iM0b8WAAAmdOx.jpg)
AZ Senate Forensic Report: "In excess of 200,000 individual ballots were printed on unauthorized, not official compromised commercially available papers not suitable for compliant ballot-voting stock. Ten-percent of the (2.1M 2020) ballots cast in Maricopa County in the Arizona general election were compromised due to the wrong paper ballot stock being utilized."
The Attorney General case against me in New York State just lost its STAR witness, SleazeBag former attorney Michael Cohen (he was disbarred for lying, and more!), who admitted to lying in this case and clearly stated that I did nothing wrong. The unhinged Judge, a highly political and fully biased Trump Hater, refused to dismiss this HOAX of a case, and has lost all CREDIBILITY. Likewise, he refuses to accept the decision of the Appeals Court, a first in New York. He should be ashamed of himself for having ruled against me before the trial even started, and for not dismissing this RIGGED WITCH HUNT now that the facts are known and that their star witness has been totally discredited, actually ADMITTING TO LYING. It is a Travesty of Justice for all to see. Businesses are fleeing “the least business friendly State in the Nation!” Racist Attorney General Letitia James should focus on record setting Murder and other Violent Crimes, something she cares, or knows, nothing about!
Donald Trump Truth Social Post 11:37 AM EST 10/26/23
I am SHOCKED...
https://t.co/A3ERclq3a5
https://t.co/A3ERclq3a5
Tagging @RepKenBuck so he hears what we're saying! JimJo only wants to expose corruption. Maybe that's a little too close to home for Buck!?!?
@JoeyMannarinoUS Tagging @RepKenBuck so he hears what we're saying! JimJo only wants to expose corruption. Maybe that's a little too close to home for Buck!?!?
🚨ALERT: TO ALL REPUBLICANS 🚨
This is a CRITICAL announcement 📣
I don’t care if you’re Ultra-MAGA or anti-Trump. Don’t care care if you’re social or fiscal conservative. Team Reagan, Bush or Trump…
NONE of us want NANCY PELOSI in charge of Congress - but ONE Republican is doing that RIGHT NOW.
His name is Mike Roger’s of Alabama.
Rogers is a REPUBLICAN who has announced that he will WORK WITH DEMOCRATS to elect a House Speaker.
This mean Mike Rogers from Deep Red Alabama is working to put NANCY PELOSI in charge of the House again - against the WILL of every Republican voter in the country.
The only explanation for this is Mike is fully compromised by establishment Washington DC and has been fully leveraged into betraying his voters.
Alabama - please demand that Mike Roger’s RESIGN or be REPLACED.
ENOUGH BETRAYAL
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
ผู้ชายขี้เงี่ยน เอาได้ทุกวัน
วายุ 🍆56
Seen from Singapore
x
Seen from Germany
Bodrum Bayan viip
Seen from Turkey
เกียร์ ⚙️ (130k)
Pemuas Emak2 STW
Seen from Indonesia
夭采劫（新号）
Seen from Netherlands
Jan Pereira 🍭
Seen from Brazil
The Future Is BNWO 🍆♠️🌍
Seen from United States
Lão Công 🔞
Seen from Australia
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
111.8M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.2M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.3M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.7M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.1M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.3M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
63.8M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.4M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers