@LAJoneser@BasedMikeLee This dumb fuck knows significant changes have been made to the new tripartite supplement, which btw has not yet been published in full. Congratulations on having an unhinged opinion before knowing the full details.
@WValderrama Thank you for donating your time and energy towards the USO community. My veteran colleagues and I appreciate you and thank you for your support.
@ClayTravis Be more specific @ClayTravis - race & sex politics. Is it possible for black or gay journalists to be objective? I say YES - but their ‘group’ says NO! Thus, impacting their ability to be objective and offer fair assessments.
@KHONnews A review of historical @APNORC polls seem to lean heavily towards negative outcomes. Which makes sense when trying to justify one’s existence. I would surmise similar responses from any race or ethnicity. Try focusing on positive impacts 🤙
@scottkatsura I could be wrong, but I highly doubt he’s an actual ICE officer. Law enforcement in general operate in buddy teams, at a minimum. Beyond that why TF is he Waikiki at night? Again, I could be wrong, but something not quite adding up.
@CivilBeat Written and oral exams are part of the process. A process, I’m sure in no way provides any clues to political or ideological leanings 🥳 Based on the criteria thus far - we should expect someone from the LGBTQ community, probably female. Do I care? No! Just enforce the law!
This woman woke up at 4 AM in 20° cold, worked out for two hours, faced a packed college Monday… and her first thought?
“I woke up this morning. I’m healthy. I get to move my body. I get to learn. And above all—Jesus loves me. Not because of anything I’ve done. Just because I’m His.”
No complaints. Just tears of gratitude.
A beautiful reminder: The greatest privilege isn’t the workout, the degree, or the sunrise—it’s waking up known and loved by our Creator.
If you’re breathing today, you’re already blessed beyond measure.
Don’t let the noise steal your thankfulness.
He loves you more than you’ll ever grasp.
Helen Andrews drops a provocative thesis: Feminization = wokeness.
Everything we call "woke"—empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition, inclusion over free speech—is just the natural outcome of institutions becoming majority-female since the 1970s.
She points to surveys: ~2/3 men prioritize free speech, ~2/3 women prioritize inclusive society. Men lean "ethics of justice" (rules/facts), women "ethics of caring" (context/relationships/emotions).
Examples: James Damore fired not for facts but because it made women "feel bad." Kavanaugh hearings: masculine side demanded evidence, feminine side focused on "she's crying."
Her take: When women predominate, politics/institutions tilt toward subjective feelings over objective rules—even if many women reject it (e.g., best Kavanaugh books by women critics).
This 2:46 clip is bold, polarizing, and ties demographic shifts to cultural ones.
Agree it's a key driver of wokeness? Or overreach? What's your read on the gender gaps in free speech/inclusion polls?