@MarkWarner I didn't think you could sink any lower Mark. But you have surpassed your previous levels of slime. I wonder who's pulling your strings because you're simply not this ignorant.
@RWMaloneMD When you pay for members, new chapters, and cross burning materials, you ARE the KKK.
The SPLC = KKK
I laugh at all the rubes who for years have been sending money to this divisive purveyor of hate and civil conflict.
@brianros1 That which you do not look for, or are not allowed to look for, you will not see.
The entire CA election system is setup in a way to make it impossible to validate or verify voters or ballots.
Only the willfully ignorant would claim there is 0 fraud.
@shipwreckedcrew 60 minutes expiration date has been printed for years.
Bari, reporters, producers, they make no difference except at the margins.
The younger generations do not watch. As the current viewers 'move on', nobody is coming in behind them.
YOU have access to the files. YOU have talked with the 'victims'. I would hope that if YOU and Khanna picked one document to go public with that it would be damning for somebody important.
YOU have a taxpayer funded staff and YOU or YOUR staff should have researched those four names of innocent guys before they were read in public.
YOU had one job, get it right for one single document.
YOU failed!
@MindReflects@Handre The Soviets war time production was truly impressive, I agree. But everything is a tradeoff. Particularly post WWII, I think many a Soviet citizen may have preferred other priorities.
Your definition of fascism was not only new to me but made me LOL. Thanks for the chuckle.
@MindReflects@Handre Please define what you mean by developed. Using empirical data using like measurements between east and west.
Also, please define what YOU mean by fascism. The term is almost meaningless today the way it is tossed around.
Wasting 30%, while nobody starves, seems to indicate the ability to produce a tremendous abundance.
'they developed the most in the 20th century'. LOL
From the ages of 1 - 18, you developed the most compared to your grandparents. So what.
It's a whole lot easier to reverse engineer the hard-won knowledge of the pioneers.
'True value' changes across actors and over time. It is impossible to measure true value because the obvious questions are 'value to who?' and 'in relation to what?'.
@ProfMJCleveland First, they are very effective and willing losers, content to being the minority party and never having to lead.
But you are correct, once they lose their golden ticket, they become very sore losers.
All we ask is:
"Lead, follow, or get out of the way." -- Lee Iacocca
Ann, I'm a subscriber of yours and used to be a Massie fan. Your last interview with Massie was disturbing. He talked a big game but ultimately (along with Khanna) publicly read the names of 4 innocent men.
Massie has access to the files and 'survivors'. He has a taxpayer supplied staff. Out of all the documents that exist, he and Khanna picked this ONE document. With that document in hand, they had ONE JOB, trace the names and verify involvement BEFORE speaking.
If this episode doesn't demonstrate to you that Massie is full of shit on the Epstein files, I don't know what would.
The DOJ is understaffed due to universal Congressional stonewalling on approving appointments. I would rather see the limited DOJ staff indicting the perpetrators of the hundreds of billions in fraud that is being exposed daily than redacting millions of Epstein documents.
Massie is right on a lot of things, but he has also become a useful idiot to the Left. His actions are actively helping people that hate us.
@GretchenCarlson@RepThomasMassie You mean like the 4 names he and Khanna already read that had absolutely NOTHING to do with Epstein?
What exactly do you think will happen if he reads off names of people mentioned in emails or investigation documents?
What do you think the Epstein files are?
Journalist???
@mehdirhasan I think the administration should just bypass the corporate press. The technology exists to go straight to the public.
The corporate press adds no context, you're factual but not truthful. In short, you add no value and are completely unnecessary.
@JakeSherman You infer that they have been doing something to date?
Even CNN is posting polls that 80% of all voters want voter ID and 66% want proof of citizenship, and they stonewall MONTH AFTER MONTH.
Tell us oh wise newsman, what exactly have they been doing that any warm body cannot?