Nearly 30 years after Tupac was killed, the case finally has a verdict.
Duane โKeffe Dโ Davis was found guilty of first degree murder after the jury deliberated for less than three hours.
Prosecutors leaned heavily on Davisโ own words and circumstantial evidence. His defense argued there was no murder weapon, DNA, fingerprints, or direct physical evidence tying him to the shooting.
Davis says he plans to appeal. He is set to be sentenced October 13 and could face life in prison.
Now the real question is what happens next. Does this verdict finally close the case, or is the appeal about to open another chapter?
Source: Clark County District Court pool footage / @ABC7
#KeffeD #TupacShakur #2Pac #TrueCrime #Courtroom
๐จ BREAKING: Lindsay Clancyโs defense attorney challenges the judge over the lone holdout juror as deliberations remain deadlocked.
The defense pushes for stronger action while the judge refuses to go any further. โ๏ธ
@Nero Bro really responded to an immigration debate with a bank balance and a gold card ๐ญ Money might buy options, but it doesnโt erase the irony of everything you just said about the system.https://t.co/Ig7piHsuhJ
You canโt cheer for aggressive immigration enforcement when it happens to other people, then suddenly call the system โbrutalโ when it reaches you.
Milo Yiannopoulos once pushed for ICE checkpoints and mass deportations. Then ICE arrested him after DHS says he overstayed his visa and had a final removal order.
Now, after experiencing the system himself, his perspective has changed.
Thatโs the real conversation here. If you believe the law should be enforced, the standard cannot change depending on whose name is on the case. And maybe empathy shouldnโt either.
What do you think?
@ruralgenxer84@PiersUncensored@piersmorgan@Nero That response proves the point. Enforce the law, yes. Dehumanize people, no. If basic empathy makes you angry, that says more about your position than mine.
@I_amMukhtar The lesson is bigger than Milo. It is easy to demand maximum force when you imagine it only happening to someone else. The real test of a principle is whether you still support it when the same system reaches you.https://t.co/Ig7piHsuhJ
You canโt cheer for aggressive immigration enforcement when it happens to other people, then suddenly call the system โbrutalโ when it reaches you.
Milo Yiannopoulos once pushed for ICE checkpoints and mass deportations. Then ICE arrested him after DHS says he overstayed his visa and had a final removal order.
Now, after experiencing the system himself, his perspective has changed.
Thatโs the real conversation here. If you believe the law should be enforced, the standard cannot change depending on whose name is on the case. And maybe empathy shouldnโt either.
What do you think?
@reggiebblue Thatโs the part people should sit with. He supported harsh enforcement until he experienced the fear, humiliation, and loss of control himself. Sometimes empathy only arrives after the system puts your own hands in cuffs.https://t.co/Ig7piHsuhJ
You canโt cheer for aggressive immigration enforcement when it happens to other people, then suddenly call the system โbrutalโ when it reaches you.
Milo Yiannopoulos once pushed for ICE checkpoints and mass deportations. Then ICE arrested him after DHS says he overstayed his visa and had a final removal order.
Now, after experiencing the system himself, his perspective has changed.
Thatโs the real conversation here. If you believe the law should be enforced, the standard cannot change depending on whose name is on the case. And maybe empathy shouldnโt either.
What do you think?
The irony writes itself. He supported aggressive immigration enforcement when it was happening to other people. Now that ICE arrested him over his own immigration status, he says he wouldnโt wish deportation on anyone. Sometimes the system looks very different when youโre the one inside it.https://t.co/qgizmZ3Uw1
You canโt cheer for aggressive immigration enforcement when it happens to other people, then suddenly call the system โbrutalโ when it reaches you.
Milo Yiannopoulos once pushed for ICE checkpoints and mass deportations. Then ICE arrested him after DHS says he overstayed his visa and had a final removal order.
Now, after experiencing the system himself, his perspective has changed.
Thatโs the real conversation here. If you believe the law should be enforced, the standard cannot change depending on whose name is on the case. And maybe empathy shouldnโt either.
What do you think?
You canโt cheer for aggressive immigration enforcement when it happens to other people, then suddenly call the system โbrutalโ when it reaches you.
Milo Yiannopoulos once pushed for ICE checkpoints and mass deportations. Then ICE arrested him after DHS says he overstayed his visa and had a final removal order.
Now, after experiencing the system himself, his perspective has changed.
Thatโs the real conversation here. If you believe the law should be enforced, the standard cannot change depending on whose name is on the case. And maybe empathy shouldnโt either.
What do you think?
@Kidd0584@BBCWorld Thatโs exactly why this case got people talking. No car, no murder weapon, no direct witness to the shooting, but the jury still believed his own words and the circumstantial evidence. I can definitely see why people are debating this one.
@AP After nearly 30 years, hearing somebody who actually knew Tupac say โhis spirit can fly nowโ hits different. The verdict wonโt bring him back, but for a lot of people this finally feels like some kind of closure.https://t.co/i52rkCkAZ5
Nearly 30 years after Tupac was killed, the case finally has a verdict.
Duane โKeffe Dโ Davis was found guilty of first degree murder after the jury deliberated for less than three hours.
Prosecutors leaned heavily on Davisโ own words and circumstantial evidence. His defense argued there was no murder weapon, DNA, fingerprints, or direct physical evidence tying him to the shooting.
Davis says he plans to appeal. He is set to be sentenced October 13 and could face life in prison.
Now the real question is what happens next. Does this verdict finally close the case, or is the appeal about to open another chapter?
Source: Clark County District Court pool footage / @ABC7
#KeffeD #TupacShakur #2Pac #TrueCrime #Courtroom
@PopBase Less than three hours for the jury to come back guilty. After almost 30 years, it was his own words that helped bring the case home. Now letโs see what happens with the appeal.https://t.co/i52rkCkAZ5
Nearly 30 years after Tupac was killed, the case finally has a verdict.
Duane โKeffe Dโ Davis was found guilty of first degree murder after the jury deliberated for less than three hours.
Prosecutors leaned heavily on Davisโ own words and circumstantial evidence. His defense argued there was no murder weapon, DNA, fingerprints, or direct physical evidence tying him to the shooting.
Davis says he plans to appeal. He is set to be sentenced October 13 and could face life in prison.
Now the real question is what happens next. Does this verdict finally close the case, or is the appeal about to open another chapter?
Source: Clark County District Court pool footage / @ABC7
#KeffeD #TupacShakur #2Pac #TrueCrime #Courtroom
Thatโs one way to look at it, but an investigation ending without charges doesnโt automatically mean every question got answered. If they looked at this for 8 years, then show what was examined, what evidence was missing, and why nobody was charged. Thatโs the part people still want explained.
@mordechai_tapir@ProudSocialist ๐ง I get what youโre saying about powerful people protecting each other and having influence everywhere. But thatโs exactly why I want names, evidence, and who actually did what instead of putting it all on one whole group.
@Fedsuprealcz@TheQuartering No evidence at all? Thatโs a stretch. Thereโs plenty of material out there. The real question is what it actually proves and whether anybody can build a real case from it.
@Olde_Shoe@Fedsuprealcz@TheQuartering Exactly. Having evidence and proving a crime are two different things. Thatโs why the evidence needs to be followed all the way through instead of people acting like the names alone prove everything.
@TheQuartering Thatโs exactly why Iโm asking what happens next. If these names been out and everybody already knew, then where are the investigations, charges, or answers? Thatโs the part nobody seems to explain.
https://t.co/oYYITOIqSt
Rep. @RepThomasMassie took the Epstein fight straight to the House floor and started naming names.
He called for investigations, prosecutions, more DOJ transparency, and accountability for survivors. These are allegations and statements made by Massie, not findings of guilt.
Now the real question is what happens next. Does the DOJ actually act on any of this, or does it disappear into another Washington headline?
Source: U.S. House / @RepThomasMassie
#EpsteinFiles #ThomasMassie #Congress #DOJ #Politics
@TheQuartering If every name was already known, then that really raises another questionโฆ why have people been talking about these names for years and weโre still waiting to see what the DOJ actually does with the evidence? Thatโs where the real conversation should be.