@junonewscom The surname Fink is primarily of German and Ashkenazi Jewish origin. It stems from the Middle High German and Yiddish word vinke, which translates to "finch" (a type of small bird).
@RealAlexJones Here's what I think is going on. Alex lost a billion dollar law suit over the Sandy Hook shooting. Only way to move forward from that is to join the dark side (Israel), and now he's doing there dirty work while playing like he's on the peoples side. He meant well at first.
Memorize this. Bookmark this. Refer it to friends. Retweet it. Let the world know. The truth. The brilliance of Jeffrey Sachs. This is the score. The real deal. The bottom line. What the radical left proxy media sockpuppets never want you to hear or know. Verity. Brutal truth.
Everyone knows Chris Sky!! 🇨🇦❤️🇺🇲
Why is his X account still suspended??
@chrissaccoccia1 #JustSayNo 🏆
If you are such "G" and freedom fighter then maybe you can help me get one of the world's #1 freedom fighters account and voice back on X? Can you name one person in the freedom movement that was arrested 26 times with over 80 charges which were all beat in court? Please help me get this message to Elon Musk. @elonmusk
Video Source #1 👇
https://t.co/OGwRhbEeVI
Original Video Interview Oct 2020 👇
https://t.co/Bjg7kDLZKa
FACT: None of the vaccines the CDC recommends for routine injection into children were licensed by the FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial.
https://t.co/0tk9X3K2zG
The Divisional Court has issued a ruling in the case of Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, deciding to fully support the actions of the College of Physicians and Surgeons (CPSO). Dr. Gill will be seeking a leave to appeal over this decision.
Dr Gill had shared opinions on social media that countered the position of public health officials. The CPSO labelled her posts as misinformation and levied professional cautions against her.
While the Court agreed that the information she shared in her posts was not necessarily incorrect, it was inconsistent with the official position of her governing body, the CPSO, and of the public health orders in effect.
Dr. Gill further believes that the actions of the CPSO constituted a breach of her right to freedom of speech, while the Court determined that the CPSO actions against her were proportionate, balancing her right to freedom of speech with her professional responsibilities.
Dr. Gill provided an abundance of evidence to support the opinions in question; evidence the Court refused to re-evaluate. Instead, they deferred to the CPSO’s own evaluation, stating that their panel consisted of “physicians with highly relevant expertise…that this court does not have” when in reality the CPSO panel had actually deferred to the “expertise” of government’s public health arm.
The Divisional Court also dismissed arguments that the CPSO’s publishing of the cautions on Dr. Gill’s public register, and the distribution of these cautions to hospitals and regulators across the continent were punitive, instead referring to these actions as merely a “remedial measure.”
Essentially, no one in this case has evaluated the accuracy of the evidence used by the government to establish their health policies nor have they reviewed Dr. Gill’s evidence contradicting the government’s position.
In addition, both the CPSO and the Court have taken the position that doctors should not express opinions contradicting government or its public health edicts, regardless of the accuracy of the contradictory opinions.
How did Canada, the strong and free, become a country where the government is assumed to be right, regardless of evidence, and where speaking truth is a punishable offence?
To read the True North article written by Clayton DeMaine click the link; https://t.co/He4meJJxid
To read the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, click the link; https://t.co/c67u7UEl7z
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super spreader.” You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it.
Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now.
Oh but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍
Two years ago, my account was BANNED for sharing this video of @stkirsch.
“COVID misinformation.” “Conspiracy theories,” they said.
However, what they called “conspiracy theories” actually ended up being true.
Here are 15 such examples in the COVID era alone:
#15 – Repeated COVID shots weaken the immune system, according to study.
#14 – Ivermectin worked! Peer-reviewed study finds 74% reduction in excess deaths.
#13 – The unvaccinated were scapegoated for failure of COVID vaccines, study finds.
#12 – Mask wearers paradoxically had an increased risk of contracting COVID.
#11 – Natural immunity proves to be seven times more protective than vaccinated immunity.
#10 – Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.
#9 – Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made.
#8 – New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID-19 vaccine harms from the public.
#7 – The COVID shots were not the only toxic measure forced on humanity. Regular mask-wearing was also harmful.
#6 – Nearly 1 in 3 COVID vaccine recipients suffered neurological side effects.
#5 – Research finds heart anomalies within 48 hours after the COVID-19 shot.
#4 – Pfizer hid nearly 80% of COVID-19 vaccine trial deaths from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.
#3 – Perverse brainwashing techniques were thoroughly studied to get you jabbed.
#2 – The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch.”
#1 – Florida’s Surgeon General has called for a halt to the use of all COVID-19 mRNA injections, citing safety concerns after the discovery of billions of DNA fragments per dose in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.
It turns out the term “conspiracy theory” could easily be interchanged with “spoiler alert.”
Articles are included in the thread below:
Some people are still wearing masks. Some people are still taking experimental boosters.
Don’t tell me there wasn’t a wide-spread effort to deceive us.
I will not be deceived.
Repost if you won’t either.
In the late 1970s, 11 babies died of SIDS in one area of Tennessee. They'd had the same vaccine from the same batch. You can argue whether the vaccine was the cause, but what's interesting is Wyeth's (now Pfizer) response. Call an emergency meeting with the scientists to determine if something had gone wrong with the batch and led to the deaths? Hell, no. Their response was to stop sending a single batch to a single area, instead splitting batches across the country, so no clusters like the Tennessee cluster could be noticed again. (If you think Pharma execs are more moral now than then ... well, enjoy that belief.)
1917 for Canadians. History matters. Learn it.
Most Canadians don't realize this, but before 1917 there was no such thing as an Income Tax. It was imposed on the Canadian people at that time as a temporary measure to pay for the War.
Believing that politicians had any legitimate claim to confiscate any portion of a person's productive income just wasn't a reality at that time. it would have been considered tyrannical to do so back then.
#TaxationIsTheft
https://t.co/0Vegaifzrz
However, as we can clearly see over 100 years later, Canadians have come to not only accept forced income redistribution, but at vastly higher levels than back then. Nowadays, the typical Canadian family is forced to pay more in taxes than they spend on the necessities of life.
When governments strive to gain more power over the people, it is never a temporary act that goes away. In light of the massive power grab by the federal and provincial governments as a response to COVID-19, I don't see Canadians truly gaining all those freedoms lost once again. I do hope to be proven wrong, but based on how Canadians have acted so far, after a full year of this madness, it's not looking good.
A little history on The Income War Tax Act of 1917.
A Temporary Wartime Measure? Income Tax
The First World War placed an unprecedented drain upon the financial resources of the Dominion of Canada. To better utilize Canada's finite resources, every aspect of supply was regulated by the Dominion Government. Rationing was introduced for everyday items from building materials to gasoline, to food. The government, limited in the ways that new revenue could by gained, also issued wartime savings bonds, raised import tariffs and levied new wartime taxes.
A luxury tax on tobacco and alcohol was the first of many taxes to be introduced during the Great War. By 1915, a Dominion tax had also been imposed on transport tickets, telegrams, money orders, cheques and patent medicines. Even staple items, such as tea and coffee, were taxed by the end of the War. After initial goods and services taxes were introduced, the Dominion Government moved to tax the incomes of businesses. The Business Profits War Tax Act of 1916 required all Canadian corporations having $50,000, or more, in capital to file a yearly tax return.
Personal income tax, introduced under the Income War Tax Act of 1917, was conceived -- like the other wartime taxes -- as a temporary measure. This act both expanded the scope of the Business Profits War Tax and introduced a tax based on yearly income to most Canadians. Those individuals who were exempt from the tax included the Governor General, foreign consuls, and those who were on active service overseas. Married Canadians with an income below $2,000, or unmarried Canadians with an income below $1,000 were also exempt from filing a tax return. Under the Income War Tax Act, eligible tax payers that did not submit a tax return were fined $100 per day with a maximum penalty of $10,000. This was an incredible fine considering, for example, that an annual married income of $3,000 was only expected to pay $20 in income tax!
Olivia Chow elected Mayor of Toronto with 15% of Eligible Voters (EV). Premier Doug Ford with 18% of EV. PM Justin Trudeau with 20 % of EV.
And they call it "democracy". Where are the run-off elections we see in so called "backward" countries?