@Tsar_Martyr That is demonstrably incorrect!
By stating you do not believe you are stating a fact about yourself not making a claim.
Whereas theists stating that they do believe are making a statement based upon the claim that what they believe is factual.
@Tsar_Martyr is a retard!
@_Vermin_ Babies are born atheist!
To have a belief in something you have to have knowledge of it. Therefore newborns are born unbelievers, aka atheist!
Atheism is the knowledge that no proof of God can be presented. Not the rejection of the belief, just the intelligence not to "believe"
@darwintojesus And yet you still, after probably about a year of me asking, can't answer this one simple question:
Can you prove morality requires and is dependant upon the existence of a God?
@bolt_carl You're really good at deflecting away from the actual topic with irrelevant shit aren't you, you'd isn't about evidence of Jesus, it's about there being no evidence of God, claiming it even proving a guy named Jesus existed doesn't prove God does! You're just assuming.
So you going by your own logic there is absolutely zero evidence for a God existing, only circular reasoning! "I believe in my mind that God exists that God exists"
Well done on the self own.
Not to mention by your own logic, your own logic is circular reasoning.
Atheists rely heavily upon circular reasoning and they don't acknowledge they do.
For instance, your making claims about reality, to make claims about reality is to trust that your mind is reliable. Yet the only way to conclude that your mind is reliable is to use your mind. So how can you possibly know it's reliable at all? Especially if your mind is the process of "billions of years of unguided mutations" and genetic breakdowns, that resulted in a mind that is "superior" to the minds of the "primordial slug" you suppository evolved from.
@bolt_carl And yet still no evidence of him being God or having godly powers.
I'll ask again, do you have any evidence for God that isn't assumption?
Yes or no?
@bolt_carl So that's a no on any evidence proving God then.
Just as I thought.
Assumption, belief, circular reasoning and God of the gaps isn't evidence.
You live in a delusion believing definably fictional stories are factual.
@bolt_carl Well you say that yet are incapable of presenting any evidence.
Or explaining how you think archaeological evidence somehow proves a God existing. Without being able to do that, it is you who is in denial of reality.
You gonna go with deflection, avoidance or the block button?
@bolt_carl Cool story bro, but you still haven't given any evidence for God, and there is zero evidence that Jesus AS DEPICTED in the bible existed.
The best you've got is evidence of a guy called Jesus existing, not a God or a God in human form.
Can you present any? Yes or no?
@bolt_carl If it's definably historical accounts, please provide definable accounts of anything God is said to have done, or of anything historical relating to God at all.
I'll wait
@GalesGuns@thoughts17181 So which one are you demonstrating here?
That you can't actually read?
That you're totally ignorant?
That you're actually retarded?
Or
That you're a troll?
It's got to be one of those because it's an actual verifiable fact that adaptation is a key part of evolution!
@JennaFights4You Science like the scientifically definable biological differences between men and women, the definition of a woman being an adult human female, the definition of female being the sex of an organism that produces ova!
That science?
Or your made up pseudoscience?