@derekhiebert John here. I absolutely agree. Is There a Meaning in this Text is such a compelling and ambitious work. However, you might be surprised how beneficial I think some of Vanhoozer's targeted thinkers are—especially Rorty. I explain in S02E03.
@IAmThursdayPS4 @DanKoch@johncraines Reformed and Liberal theology. He's incredible. Also check out Bultmann and Tillich for serious theology outside the classically Reformed tradition. 2
@IAmThursdayPS4 @DanKoch@johncraines Of course! Just want to mention that @johncraines discusses truth a good deal on the latest episode if you're interested. With regard to theological alternatives to Reformed theology, Schleiermacher is actually perfect. You can think of him as building a bridge between 1
@_danielrosado @DanKoch@johncraines You into Panentheistic Christianity? I guess some Process Thought heads in that direction, but do any of those thinkers literally identify God with reality ontologically?
I listened to a Greg Boyd sermon on Romans 9 today during lunch which led into a deep dive on Piper vs Boyd articles. My brain is exhausted.
QFT: “At the end of the day, I hope I love the truth more than my system of theology.” @ReconstructPod
@Sethhorton813 @james_ka_smith@KevinVanhoozer Glad you enjoyed it. John here. I would have much rather discussed Smith over Plantinga. Agree that Smith's Fall of Interp has great insights. Would be interesting to think about that more going forward. In fact, it would be great to interview Smith!