Unitedās transfer strategy doesnāt make sense anymore.
Man United have spent over Ā£1B since 2013, havenāt won the league in over a decade, and still act like players should be honoured to join.
City dominate, win the UCL, move fast. We negotiate for months, miss every top target, then pretend option D was āthe planā all while hiding behind this INEOS āwe only want players who want usā policy that clearly isnāt working.
And the constant complaining about fees is getting ridiculous. Every top club is paying big money and getting deals done. You canāt spend weeks talking to a player, know the market price, then act shocked when it comes back Ā£80ā85m instead of Ā£60m and walk away. Thatās not smart negotiation thatās wasted time.
Other clubs run multiple deals at once, closing signings back to back. United somehow spend a month on one target, then start again from scratch.
And the truth fans donāt want to hear? The āUnited pullā is dying. It used to be players grew up watching us win everything now the players weāre chasing grew up watching us fail.
No titles. No identity. No reason to pick us over elite clubs.
This isnāt bad luck. Itās a club living off a past it hasnāt replaced.
@markgoldbridge Itās the same story every window. No clear plan, no ambition, just scrambling for stop gap options while every other top club moves decisively. How a club of Unitedās size has ended up with recruitment this directionless is beyond embarrassing.
Bloody Wilcox, man. Itās so true. How are they even doing that? If the manager isnāt central to convincing signings, somethingās gone badly wrong behind the scenes. If thatās genuinely how it happened, itās a strange way to run recruitment. Youād expect the manager to be heavily involved in selling the project to a key signing.
Hard not to agree. Itās not even about signing five players overnight its the lack of urgency thatās frustrating. Other clubs seem able to work on multiple deals at once, while we look like weāre waiting for one domino to fall. Recruitment should be months ahead of where we are now. If every transfer depends on the previous one, thatās a planning issue. The squad needed major surgery before the window even opened. Itās the lack of visible planning thatās worrying. No one expects five signings in a week, but we should be capable of working on more than one deal at a time. Every summer we hear ābe patient,ā while other clubs quietly get their business done. The concern isnāt the pace itās whether thereās actually a plan.
I think the biggest issue is that people assume every move is purely about football. For a 16-year-old and their family, the financial security a Premier League club can offer is life-changing. Even if the pathway to the first team is harder, many see it as a risk worth taking.
That said, I do agree that more independent career advice would help. Agents donāt always have the playerās long term development as the top priority.
What the hell are they even talking about? Why are United supposedly āsurprisedā by Tottenham signing Mateus Fernandes? Stop worrying about what other clubs are doing and sort yourselves out first.
If you wanted the player, get the deal done. If you didnāt, move on. Constantly acting shocked when other clubs do good business is embarrassing. Focus on fixing Manchester United instead of looking over the fence.
So because Ed Woodward handed out huge fees for the wrong players, INEOS have decided thatās a reason not to spend big on the right ones?
Antony, Sancho, Pogba those werenāt failures because they were expensive. They were the wrong signings or were poorly managed. That doesnāt mean you stop backing the squad when top-quality players become available.
Using past mistakes as an excuse to avoid making the right investments now is a joke. #mufc
@StretfordPaddck@RioMeets Exactly. People have been trying to force Mainoo into the No. 6 role when his best attributes are carrying the ball, beating players, arriving in the box, and contributing goals. Heās an all action No. 8, and itās good to hear someone like Thiago sees it too.
Shoutout to @SwedishRumble honestly one of the most detailed Man United analysis accounts out there. Deep dives into transfers, fees, wages, squad planning, tactics, and the financial side of deals. Rare level of research and insight. Deserves way more recognition.
Jason Wilcox fumbling this is no surprise. I still donāt get why heās even at United his CV was hardly convincing in the first place. Then he comes to a club like Manchester United and still manages to mess up a deal like this.
The player literally said Bruno Fernandes is his idol, Bruno even tried to convince him, and we still couldnāt get it done. Thatās embarrassing. Wilcox has been a joke.
This is a solid framework tbf thinking in āvalue per year vs cost per yearā is the only way these fees make sense.
Where it gets tricky is your assumptions: development curve, injury risk, and whether he actually becomes a top-4 CM. If he hits, Ā£80ā90m looks cheap in hindsight. If he stalls, youāve massively overpaid for years 1ā5.
Thatās why age carries a premium youāre not just buying output, youāre buying optionality. Bouaddi at 19 has upside + resale + longer prime. A 25 y/o at the same price has to deliver immediately.
So the question isnāt āis he worth Ā£80m today?ā itās āwhatās the probability he becomes a Ā£150m-level player?ā
@FabrizioRomano You canāt script it better than this. Klopp always spoke about the Germany job like a dream, and now itās right there for him. If he takes it, expect energy, pressing football, and a complete cultural reset. Germany with Klopp could be scary again.
The clubās appeal isnāt what it used to be. Previous generations grew up watching United dominate. Todayās players grew up watching inconsistency and decline.
No league titles. No clear direction. No compelling reason to choose United over Europeās top sides.
This isnāt misfortune itās the consequence of relying on a legacy that hasnāt been rebuilt.
@UtdFaithfuls Yeah, probably not.
That wouldāve been a massive jump for a 21-year-old and completely out of step with the rest of the structure. You end up setting a precedent you donāt need and risking dressing-room imbalance for a player who still has to prove himself at that level.
Another example of how quickly the market is moving and how easily United can get left in the āwe were interestedā category.
For Manchester United, this kind of signing also highlights a recurring issue: midfield targets getting snapped up early while United are still āassessing optionsā or waiting for prices to settle. By the time decisions are made, the fee has either jumped or the player has already moved.
This reads like a classic āevery big club is interestedā transfer cycle rather than anything concrete.
If Bournemouth are already signalling heās not for sale and trying to tie him down to a new contract, then the Ā£60m starting point becomes pretty irrelevant anyway. Once youāve got Arsenal, City, Chelsea, Spurs and United all supposedly in the mix, youāre basically in āprice gets inflated until someone walks awayā territory.
For Manchester United specifically, this also feels like a familiar pattern: identified target, competition ramps up, fee rises, then the club āreassessesā and either overpays late or moves on. Neither outcome has been particularly efficient in recent windows.
At this stage, itās less about whether Alex Scott is a real target and more about whether this is genuine positioning from Bournemouth or just early-window noise being amplified by multiple clubs being linked for engagement.
Wages should always reflect performance, not just reputation. If you start handing out Ā£250kāĀ£300k deals to new arrivals without proving it on the pitch, you risk killing motivation in the dressing room.
United have been burned before with inflated contracts itās not about big names, itās about the right structure. If the board is finally prioritising balance and merit, thatās a step in the right direction.