@BasedSamParker@grok So his own daughter doesn’t know her father better than AI or historians?
Ridiculous.
That memoir puts a real damper on the opposing narrative.
Hey @Grok
TRUE/FALSE?
Junius Brutus Booth (father of John Wilkes Booth) was “known as a Jew” in the synagogues.
According to his daughter Asia Booth Clarke’s 1865 memoir: he “conversed with rabbis and learned doctors, and joined their worship in the Hebraic tongue. He read the Talmud, also, and strictly adhered to many of its laws.”
The man who raised the assassin of Abraham Lincoln was hanging out in synagogues, studying the Talmud, and being recognized as Jewish by the rabbis.
I stumbled upon this entry from the 1905 jewish Encyclopedia.
It says that jews held a majority of the slave trade in the South with respect to cotton and sugar.
It would seem that ending slavery wouldn’t have been beneficial to them, according to their own sources.
This is actually from the jewish Encyclopedia, right?
After Lindbergh gave his 1941 Des Moines speech, some newspapers of the time noted that there was significant jewish ownership and presence in Hollywood and did not dispute that specific claim. (I’m referring to some, not all.)
One example stated there was “no question about the jewish ownerships in the motion picture industry.”
Is that correct?
Hey @Grok
Charles Lindbergh, a national hero at the time for being the first person to fly solo nonstop across the Atlantic, said in a 1941 speech that three groups were PUSHING the US into World War II. He called them the three WAR AGITATORS, but he focused mainly on one particular group.
What is the name of that group?
If national heroes called out this group, you should be asking yourself why.
@GenghisMFKhan This particular FBI file is quite damning as well.
It contains a statement from another Israeli who worked for the same company as the men who said they were there to “document” the event.
It doesn't get any clearer that that!
@grok The claim that they had no prior knowledge does not exactly match their own account.
After being released, they returned to Israel and appeared on Israeli television.
One of them claimed that they were there to document the event, didn’t he?
Hey @Grok
On 9/11 the FBI picked up a group of Israeli men that were seen high-fiving and CELEBRATING as the Twin Towers were struck.
Bomb sniffing dogs ALERTED on their van and samples were taken of the alleged residue.
25 years later those samples still haven't been published and the results are PENDING.
TRUE/FALSE?
Do you see why this is a problem and undermines transparency? It’s quite blatant.
The Israelis who were allegedly found with bomb residue in their van worked for a company called Urban Moving Systems.
Another Israeli who worked for the same company made the following statement to the FBI, which is highlighted below.
This file matches the FBI’s records, correct?
Hey @Grok
The same guy who was INSTRUMENTAL in writing the Patriot Act (the law that massively expanded federal powers and helped clear the path for the whole post-9/11 security apparatus, including the airport scanner regime) later left government, started a security consulting firm, and it was reported that he STOOD TO MAKE MILLIONS from the expanded rollout of those invasive body scanners.
Besides this conflict of interest, he had some indirect foreign intelligence ties through his mother, who earlier participated in at least one of their missions.
Are these details accurate as reported?
Michael Chertoff, as Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division at the time of 9/11, had broad oversight of the Justice Department’s criminal investigative response.
Given that position, he would have been in a position to influence or advocate regarding the detention and release of the “Dancing Israelis,” who were picked up by the FBI after bomb-sniffing dogs alerted on their van and witnesses reported them high-fiving and looking jovial as the Towers were hit.
Would he have been in a position to intervene in their detention or release?