Redacted is a news show hosted by @ClaytonMorris and @NataliMorris. Redacted's mission is to give a voice to news the mainstream media hides or ignores.
The most dangerous sentence in American politics might be: both sides agree. When the parties link arms, check your wallet and check who is getting deployed.
@Khaled_Dudin@MaxBlumenthal That is exactly the stakes — once seizing a journalist's phones at the border becomes normal, it stops being about one reporter. The question is how far that standard spreads before anyone pushes back.
WHEN THE BORDER BECOMES A POLITICAL CHECKPOINT: MAX BLUMENTHAL & GRAYZONE
Earlier this year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection interrogated journalist @MaxBlumenthal and seized his two phones as he returned from a reporting trip to Iran.
Can the government seize Americans’ personal devices without a warrant? Attorney Jenin Younes (@JeninYounesEsq) breaks down the government’s sweeping border powers and how officials frequently turn them against citizens who challenge U.S. policy.
Growing reports of retaliation against dissenters raise a troubling question: are officials using border enforcement to punish people for criticizing specific foreign policies?
@pereira4785 Exactly — the obligation does not end when they come home. Prosecuting the same people a government was happy to send is the final proof the support was never real.
Veterans Day thought, and it should not be controversial. If a government is willing to send people to war, it should be willing to tell the truth about why, and take care of them when they come home.
@fbastiat17 That is the core of it — the public is owed the real reason before anyone is sent, not a managed story after the fact. The truth about why tends to surface years later, long after the cost has been paid.
Independent media exists because legacy media stopped answering to viewers and started answering to advertisers and access. You can hear the difference every day.
@MarkAHoffman2 The Park Service exception says a lot — the closer an agency stays to ground you can actually walk on, the more it has to deal in reality. The further an agency gets into managing narratives, the less anyone believes a word it says.
@C_4_2014 Partial truth is the standard product — just enough to keep the official story standing, never enough to actually check it against. Full honesty would end half of these debates overnight, which is exactly why it never arrives.
@neck_bone Those revisions are exactly why people stopped believing the headline numbers — jobs announced with fanfare, then quietly revised away later. Once that happens a few times, every official statistic gets read the same way.
@BelisleKristen It does — and that is the problem. Name one emergency power that was handed back voluntarily once the crisis passed. The pattern is not an accident, it is how the expansion works.
Oh, you mean when we installed a puppet Shah who had full military support but then we had to fly him out of there when the Iranian people launched a revolution we didn't expect, and we considered executing civilian protestors but stopped short so instead we armed their neighboring country with chemical weapons to attack Iranian men, women and children, and then we shot their civilian passenger plane out of the sky and never apologized, and then we imposed decades of sanctions of mass destruction, and then we bombed their elementary schools and double-tapped the rescuers? Is THAT when this all started? Gosh, that was terrible of them to do.
WHY ACCEPT THE FBI’S OFFICIAL NARRATIVE WITHOUT DEMANDING MORE? BUCKLEY CARLSON QUESTIONS THE KIRK CASE
Turning Point should be pressing for answers about gaps in the Charlie Kirk assassination case. Instead, it rushes to accept the FBI’s official narrative and attack people who question it.
Buckley Carlson disputes the claim that Tyler Robinson acted alone and argues that no evidence ties him to firing the .30-06 shot officials say struck Kirk. Where is the surveillance footage showing Robinson taking that shot?
@buckleycarlson joins me to examine why influencers who claim to have been Charlie’s friends keep repeating the official account rather than demanding evidence.