In an interview with the Danish newspaper Berlingske, Denmark’s former foreign minister Per Stig Møller recounts a highly compromising story about the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Navi Pillay.
In 2008, when Denmark faced problems in Pakistan (a car bomb exploded outside the embassy) because of the Muhammad cartoons, Denmark turned to the UN - including the then High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay.
On that occasion Pillay was completely dismissive of supporting Denmark. Her only recommendation to the foreign minister was to introduce censorship. That, she said, would prevent the problem in the future.
I find it shocking that an opponent of freedom of speech can be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Could @NobelPrize perhaps explain why they award the Peace Prize to Navi Pillay when, as UN High Commissioner, her office handed the names of more than 50 dissidents, including Uyghurs, to Chinese authorities, after which families testified under oath to intimidation, arbitrary detention, torture, disappearance and deaths in camps?
UN whistleblower Emma Reilly, who worked under Pillay, states she warned of the risk and was dismissed while staff who transmitted the names were promoted. This makes Pillay at least partly responsible of what happened to these people.
She later chaired the UN commission that in 2025 found Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, largely from public statements and perceived wartime conduct from news reports. Furthermore records show repeated statements focused on Israel alongside silence on many of the world’s most repressive regimes, Iran for example.
The committee’s own citation praises her ‘moral compass’, which makes the committee’s own judgment highly questionable as they completely failed to address these documented contradictions.
❌ The Flydubai co-pilot was radicalized in Qandahar, Afghanistan.
✅ The Flydubai co-pilot was radicalized in Melbourne, Australia by a mosque linked to the Muslim Brotherhood organization.
Let that sink in.
People of Australia, wake up 🙏🏼♥️
Europe finally said it out loud. On Thursday the European Parliament voted 381 to 167 asking the Council to put Muslim Brotherhood linked entities and individuals on the EU terrorist list where the legal criteria are met, and to look past the official structures at the front organisations, financial networks and youth groups around them, it also wants a full account of EU money that reached Brotherhood associates and FEMYSO kept out of EU events.
It is a resolution, not a ban yet, so the decision now sits with the 27 governments. 167 MEPs voted against it. Ask yourself why.
BTW, the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in the UAE.
Why don't they teach us THIS in school?!
"3/4 of the original Christian world was conquered by Islam through extreme violence!"
"By the 1600s, Islam had covered MORE of the Earth's surface than the Roman Empire did at its peak.
During that war, during that expansion, 280 million people died!"
He means 280 million Christians were EXECUTED by Muslims for following Jesus and we're STILL being hunted down and murdered by these satanic savages today in our own streets.
And the democrat party gave them asylum while blue state governors harbor and protect them.
Vote red all the way down the ballot.
This is Raith Al-Tamimi, an Iraqi living in the UK, saying out loud what many across the Arab world think but can’t openly say.
His perspective on Israel’s wars since October 7 is worth hearing.
Watch this.
Veel reacties: het zullen de moslims wel zijn. Veel tegenwerpingen: dit geldt voor alle geloven, ook het christelijke. Maar wie leest nu zelf het rapport? Nou, ik.
Hieronder de overzichtstabel uit het rapport van de UvA. Let wel, dit zegt niets over de groei/krimp, alleen over het nu. Quote uit het rapport: "In de analyses die ervoor controleren hoe religieus iemand is, vinden we daarnaast dat moslims ten opzichte van niet-gelovigen op vijf van de acht dimensies minder positief staan ten opzichte van vrouwenemancipatie dan niet-gelovigen; geen vergelijkbare relatie wordt gevonden voor andere religies ten opzichte van niet-gelovigen."
Ik lees dit als: moslims staan minder positief tegenover vrouwenemancipatie dan andere gelovigen die net zo religieus zijn.
Enersijds zal dit niemand verbazen, maar anderzijds is het toch een beetje taboe om te zeggen.
Wanneer je geen flauw benul hebt van wat je aan het doen bent, maar toch wilt DEUGEN.
Onze D66-regering🤡 heeft o.a. het Druzendorp Majdal Shams op de sanctielijst gezet.🤦♂️
Hadden ze maar geen foute postcode moeten hebben.
RTL meldt dat 15,8 procent van de Nederlanders het slaan van een vrouw niet onder alle omstandigheden afwijst. Staatssecretaris Judith Tielen noemt dat „schrikbarend”. Terecht.
Weet u wat ook schrikbarend is?
Wat RTL niet vertelt: de gebruikte World Values Survey stelde óók deze vragen:
Q141: Mag een man zijn vrouw slaan?
Q249: Tot welke religie behoort u? Met moslim als afzonderlijke categorie.
Q123–128: Hoe belangrijk is God, hoe vaak bidt u en hoe religieus bent u?
Q231–233: Waar zijn u en uw ouders geboren?
Q250: Wat is uw etnische achtergrond?
De officiële UvA-samenvatting is vervolgens glashelder:
“Daarnaast zijn moslims gemiddeld traditioneler dan niet-religieuzen, ook als rekening wordt gehouden met hoe belangrijk religie voor iemand is.”
De UvA voegt eraan toe dat dit verschil bij andere religies niet werd gevonden.
RTL noemt wél leeftijd, geldzorgen en de manosfeer. Maar religie, herkomst en etniciteit: nul woorden.
De uitslag is „schrikbarend”. De onderzoeksbevinding over moslims blijkbaar vooral ongemakkelijk.
Dat is geen gebrek aan gegevens. Dat is journalistieke selectie: alle vragen stellen, alleen de comfortabele antwoorden publiceren.
#Vrouwenrechten #veiligheid
https://t.co/YTKprNOqIn
https://t.co/fAe4gXnCeV
Do not forget I am a transsexual who had a civil discourse with Charlie Kirk. The trans cult never wants to build bridges or have conversations.
You are missed #charliekirk 🥲
De denkfout is dat kerst en iftar als hetzelfde worden behandeld. Kerst behoort tot de collectieve cultuur en wordt door miljoenen Nederlanders volstrekt seculier gevierd. Hun kerstlunch vereist geen gebed of Bijbellezing. Een iftar ontleent haar betekenis daarentegen rechtstreeks aan de islam en aan islamitische rituelen rond de ramadan. Het is geen gewone maaltijd.
Unlike @AbdulElSayed, I’m an Arab who is actually from Israel. My family lived through the establishment of the state of Israel and what he calls the “Nakba.” The Holocaust was nothing like the events of the “Nakba” where my grandfather was told to flee by Arab leaders (not Jews) so the Arabs could “defeat the Jews.” He refused, and all the Arab residents who stayed were given citizenship. Those who fled, a large number by choice, were not permitted to return, as often happens in war. That is a catastrophe, a “nakba” of their own making. But there was no choice in the Holocaust, there was no citizenship for those who stayed. You are intentionally comparing a war and a genocide. They are not the same.
Your vile attempt to co-opt the largest massacre of the Jewish people in history, the systematic murder of six million people simply because they were Jews, for your own dystopian pro-terror Muslim Brotherhood agenda is despicable. I see through you Abdul. You may be able to fool Western Americans with your garbage, but we know who you really are.
یا کذاب ابن کذاب
This man brought the receipts! He called out Melissa Ewing, a board member of the Peoria Unified School Board district. She claimed she hadn’t seen any incidents of transgender bathroom policies endangering children. After he destroyed her, she claimed she was referring to government data and tried to recover. She couldn’t!
Twee jaar geleden grapjes gemaakt over de omvang van twee dames. Uitzending was nog geen 24 uur online. En nu voor een meervoudige kamer (3 rechters) moeten verschijnen terwijl er duizenden zware zaken op de plank blijven liggen. En een OM dat ons geweld tegen vrouwen in de schoenen schuift.
Today, on Heritage Day, I proudly celebrate my Afrikaner heritage. Afrikaners became a people in Africa through settlement, not through a later arrival from elsewhere. From 1652, Dutch, German and French Huguenot settlers at the Cape slowly formed a new community on African soil: they adapted European farming and faith to a harsh frontier, their language grew from Dutch into Afrikaans, and generations were born, buried and bound to the land. The trek inland, the farms, the churches and the long memory of drought, war and harvest made that bond deeper still. That is why the love of South Africa and of Africa is not borrowed or theoretical — it is the love of the only country in which Afrikaners came into being. Afrikaner heritage is therefore a South African heritage. There is no other homeland waiting across the sea. There is only this one home: South Africa.