Reddrik

Just a lad living his life

[Buffpup 🦴VchiBan✨ @Buffpup_]

@TwitchSupport How about you see what your community wants instead ignoring the huge backed petition everyone signed to NOT have this - but ya won’t cause you corrupt like every ceo 💅

[DistantCoder @DistantCoder]

All streamers should disable this immediately. Despicable that this is on by default when twitch knows damn well no one wants any part of this.

[DistantCoder @DistantCoder]

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts.

1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid.

2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting.

3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action.

4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it.

5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time.

Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.

[Reddrik @Reddrik]

@weewee42069 @saulvarela00 @SergioMiedesTCG So you know that the opponent intentionally ignored the mistake? While it's both plays responsibility to make sure that the gamestate is correct, it's more so for the played playing the cards in question.

[Reddrik @Reddrik]

@Ooaitt_ @SergioMiedesTCG The repair would not be the correct way to fix the gamestate, that was why it was appealed and why the head judge gave them a loss.

[Reddrik @Reddrik]

@SunnySlash @Krekkov Nah, it looks awful. The background characters changed, and her changed features make her look like a whole new character.

[Reddrik @Reddrik]

@NVIDIAGeForce Removes all the style from the original and makes it look generic and awful.

[CyYuVtuber Male Wife Arc @CyYuVtuber]

Bro, FUCK Gen Ai… this shit NASTY AS FUCK! It’s ugly. Get it outta here.

[Reddrik @Reddrik]

@ZtheFleur @xMightyPeanutx @Yo_sway08 @ImnotReed

[Stephanie Cavinder @Kuriositykills]

If you’re attempting to use AI to edit someone’s photos in a sexual manner without their consent….

You’re a sexual predator.

Hope that helps. Fuck you.

[˖ ࣪⟡𝕭𝖑𝖆𝖟𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖔𝖙𝖍⟡ ࣪˖ @Blazingoth]

if you’re using grok to remove someone’s clothes or alter their pictures without consent. you are genuinely fuckin weird.

and to the OF women advocating for this kind of behavior, fuck you :)

[Kat @Kyaandere]

deleted pics of myself as far as i could scroll, won't be posting on twitter anymore bc people are disgusting with the AI shit, just sad how people don't understand the concept of consent and are just using it to harrass women, also really embarrassing how some girls are going along with it just to trend on twitter to promote their sites
i'll primarily post on instagram from now on
https://t.co/OoeyCodUdd

[vids that go hard @vidsthatgohard]

The greatest fuck around and find out moment I’ve ever seen, absolutely flawless

[Piers Morgan @piersmorgan]

UPDATE: No dead, driver was intoxicated with drink/drugs, Police say it was an accident, Guadeloupe is not in France, Legacy media widely reported the truth, Robinson the self-acclaimed ��journalist’ silent after reporting lies.

[Zach Fuller @zachtothefuller]

HIRE. VOICE. ACTORS.

THIS. SHIT. SUCKS.

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

He is Sam Pepper, a well-known influencer in the UK.

He came to India on Diwali and fired a rocket toward a group of kids, hitting a little girl. Because it was livestreamed, he couldn’t delete the footage, and his followers openly criticised him for the reckless act and expressed concern for the child.

He later claimed that the girl had only a minor cut, that he paid for the hospital expenses, apologised, and that the matter was settled. He immediately left India after that. However, the truth is coming out now.

The girl did not suffer a minor cut but permanent damage to her left eye, full-thickness corneal injury with uveal tissue prolapse. She lost her eye because a gora streamer wanted to have “reckless fun.” The Indians who feel “ashamed as an Indian” the moment some gora experiences the slightest discomfort here should now see how many gora feel “ashamed as a British” for this.

Requesting @MEAIndia to take up this issue officially with the UK govt. This incident must have serious legal and financial repercussions for that influencer.

[ᴄʀᴇᴠᴇᴛᴛᴀ @CrevettaVT]

Lady

[AGGRO CRAB 💥 @AggroCrabGames]

tbh would rather you pirate our game than play this microtransaction-riddled @Roblox slop ripoff

[giggly ♡ @xgigglypuff]

This is explicitly racist.

A white guy in 2017 committed the deadliest mass shooting in US history. Does that mean it would be a disgrace to have a white man as president now? Of course not.

No logic, just racist propaganda and vibes