(4) #Romans 1:26 is not referring to lesbianism. It is referring to a non-coital heterosexual act. "In like manner" the men in v. 27 are engaged in the same act, e.g. anal sex. The context is idol worship. This is ritualized anal sex not #homosexuality. #biblestudy#bible
(3) "Unnatural" in #Romans 1 is not negative. It is only descriptive. It is better translated "beyond nature". #God is seen doing something "unnatural" in Romans 11:24, does this mean God is acting immoral? No! Context determines morality. Not action or design. #biblestudy#bible
(2) If #Romans 1 reflects Wisdom of Solomon 13 & 14, the idols reflect Egyptian gods. The cult of Isis was popular in Rome at this time. Romans 1:26-27 reflects sexual acts the priests/priestesses were rumored to engage in. This has nothing to do with #homosexuality. #biblestudy
(1) Paul uses Wisdom of Solomon ch. 13 and 14 as the literary backdrop for #Romans 1. Wisdom is an apocryphal work written in Egypt. Understanding this work plays a huge factor in properly understanding Romans 1. Even the infamous #homosexual verses. #biblestudy#bible
#God designed ALL of creation, not part of it. As such, how can we detect #design scientifically? This would require a backdrop of non-design. This is inconsistent with biblical truth. Rocks are equally designed. #IntelligentDesign loses. #EvolutionaryCreation wins. #biologos
If we try to turn #Genesis into modern cosmology, we are making the text say something that it never said. Instead, #God adopted the language of the culture to communicate in terms they understood. #bible#frameworkhypothesis
The Israelites received no revelation to update or modify their scientific understanding of the cosmos. They did not know that stars were suns; they did not know that the earth was spherical and moving through space, etc. Stop reading #Genesis as if they did! #bible#creation
MARK OF THE BEAST (A THREAD):
1) 666 is actually based on something called "gematria" which is the practice of translating letters into numbers or vice versa. 666 translates to "Neron Kesar" in Hebrew or "Nero Caesar". Pretty sure the ancient Jews considered Rome "The Beast".
@BrianGodawa I have not read any of your books yet, but can I assume you are a partial preterist? Also, can you briefly summarize your understanding of the millennium?
I think it is safe to say that if this hasn't been fulfilled yet, then Jesus was wrong. Everyone in Jesus' audience here has been dead for over 1,900 years. The fulfillment, therefore, must have happened before the last original follower died.
(1) Matt. 16:28 "Some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." #bible#jesus#secondcoming#preterism
(2) Matt. 16:28 fulfillment options: 6 days later (transfiguration), half a year later (resurrection/Pentecost), or 40 years later (Israel judged). Unless Jesus expected most of his followers to die before Pentecost, last option wins! #preterism#secondcoming
A true #Jew is one who has faith in Christ. The #Church didnโt replace Israel as Godโs people; it joined #Israel as Godโs people. #Revelation is a judgement prophecy against the first century apostate Israel, not this modern imposter. #preterism#bible
Modern #Israel is not God's chosen people. The #Church is. Read Ephesians 2:11-22. #Christ created "in himself one new man in place of the two." Together, believing Jews and believing Gentiles are in one family and have become the new temple of God! #preterism#bible