@baroncoleman@paleochristcon@RealCandaceO You nailed it B! This is a trick he loves to use. He will insist on a specific prompt for the debate because he knows he can’t defend the fedslop story, so he will insist on holding her to speculation as if she claims an alt, but, Falsification is independent of replacement!
@paleochristcon@TonySunner@baroncoleman@WakeTheWool@RealCandaceO I told you this is a L take Andrew. You will likely have this debate and probably win, and still you’re arguing against the truth of the matter which too many people know. You think you’re invincible but this is a much bigger risk than you realize.
@DekkerJordan@paleochristcon@MikebKut@DaniHasReceipts Yeah I didn’t think so, I liked this dude a lot. But every damn stream he is all about the money, and now he swears he’s being paid by tpusa but I swear not for speaking against “conspiracies” regarding the Kirk murder. This guy ruined his chance to grow and bigger. L take Andy
@DaniHasReceipts@paleochristcon@MikebKut Inferior to you? We will see. If TR ends up dead before the trial, is that finally enough coincidence for you to agree that this whole thing is bullshit??? ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION
@Oz_Xtian_Gal@realstewpeters You are on the side of the positive claim and therefore must prove TR did it beyond a reasonable doubt. Do you truly believe that he did it, let alone that there’s enough proof that he did? These are very different things which confuse you all.
@Oz_Xtian_Gal@realstewpeters Unfortunately for you I’m not a moron and know more about this than you do. There’s no need for me to make a claim on someone else, for me to be able to criticize or even falsify the claim that TR is guilty. Falsification is independent of replacement!
@Oz_Xtian_Gal@realstewpeters In intellectual forum, the positive claim has to bring the evidence. I have the negative claim and therefore do not have a burden of bringing proof. If I made a claim that someone else did it then yes I would have to bring evidence which is what you are trying to get me to do.
@Oz_Xtian_Gal@realstewpeters Excuse me??? No one needs any fucking evidence that anyone else did it! The hypothesis doesn’t need to be replaced in order for it to be falsified. TR is INNOCENT until proven guilty, or do you forget this about our country? Don’t need to give
You someone else to see this is bs!
@Oz_Xtian_Gal@realstewpeters Why because they have said that the whole time??? You really believe they will suddenly have better evidence? So you admit the evidence so far is horseshit, that’s something I guess
@lornamacaulay@baroncoleman Show me the proof, holy shit you’re so dumb. You can’t just make shit up when you’re losing. I know you think that’s okay after Erika and Kolvet’s behavior but it’s fucking disgusting so stop
@jhskjs1976@baroncoleman Well it was crystal clear as the moon sun 4k footage right? Shouldn’t we be able to see all that stuff like they all swore outside of the prelim hearing? No? You sure???
@paleochristcon@horsemedicine69 You can’t possibly know that but the prosecution showed the same shit and all the shills like you came out and said, it’s over, 4k vid of him taking the shot. Now you can’t tell he has or doesn’t have a gun Andrew? If all the shills were not lying then there’s vid of TR w/ a gun
@paleochristcon@JayDyer Bahahaha, Jay says it’s weird one time and you agree after supporting this shit for weeks. You’re a fucking pathetic shill now, wtf happened to you??? It’s literally not debatable that this doesn’t make sense so you try to make people debate a replacement theory instead???!!!