Reid Sheftall, MD

Gen, Plastic, Cardiac-(congenital repair) surgeon MIT physics author, filmmaker Uni physics prof. I don't say anything I can't prove. C19: 1st & 100% correct

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@val46316382 Thank you, Val.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@Kevdreamsawake I already know who it is and where he lives. I told the police but they refuse to act.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@JordanJjerdoc Thank you, Jordan.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@SilverHollowsz Thank you so much, Paula.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@RogerSeheult Thank you, Roger. We still have to do our debates . Since I lost access to YouTube (because I can't verify that I am me) so that will have to be resolved first. Perhaps with the name change. As for now, they won't even let me comment on a video or press "like".

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@Elaine451018047 The US Embassy in Phnom Penh refused to help when I asked them.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Have you heard the latest? Allan Lichtman who has been very accurate in predicting presidential elections since the 1980s is currently predicting Harris will beat Trump. Remember, he uses his "13 keys" system:

The "keys" are:

- Midterm gains

– No primary contest required to get the nomination

– running as an incumbent

– third party running that gets>10% of the vote

– short-term economy

– long-term economy

– policy change

– social unrest an issue for incumbent party

– scandals during any candidate’s last 4 years

– No foreign/military failure

– Major foreign/military success

– incumbent charisma

– challenger charisma

According to Lichtman, Harris has 6 keys, Trump has 3. I disagree as I will explain below. Note 1 : Since there are 13 keys, you only need 7 to win; Lichtman's prediction contest, that is. Note 2: There may be only 12 keys this year because there is no "incumbency". Biden was the incumbent but he was forced out of the race by Obama, who threatened, in a phone call to Biden on July 25, to persuade Harris to pursue a removal from office on him (Biden) pursuant to Amendment 25. Pelosi, Schumer and possibly other major donors put serious pressure on him as well through the politicians in their pockets. In Biden's corner were his wife, Jill, his son, Hunter, and the law. That’s right. The ball was in Joe's court and he would have been the nominee if he hadn't been forced out in the "palace coup". Laws aplenty were broken to get Harris in there and just hand over Joe's war chest (i.e., campaign donations, a.k.a. donor money).

The planning and effort some practical jokers might engage in to stuff boxes in a junior high Homecoming race for King and Queen far outweighs what the operators did to force Biden out. They just wrote a resignation letter for Biden and signed it for him. (Sorry, the signature at the bottom of the letter does not even remotely resemble Biden's automated signature or hand handwritten ones anyone can find). They also forgot to put it on letter head and forgot to affix the Presidential seal). That letter should NOT have been accepted by the Election Commissioner.

Biden is capable of omitting all of these critical pieces but not his staff who ordinarily prepare these types of documents and place them in front of him on his desk for signature. Who prepared that ridiculous excuse for an official resignation letter and who forged his signature? **A word of caution: There is such a thing as "bait, switch, discredit, claim victory". With the forged excuse for a resignation letter, it would work something like this:

1. Submit a proper Letter of Resignation to the Election Commissioner who accepts it (but there is much more to this(see below)).

2. Float the purposefully- inauthentic letter out to the public. [They posted Joe's letter on everyone's paragon of (important business) authenticity, Twitter (X).]

3. Label as "conspiracy theorists" those who claim the resignation was illegitimate by pointing out that Biden was forced out of the race (using threats such as those used by Obama, that would scare someone at Biden's level of cognitive function into doing something he did not want to do ) and DISCREDIT the "conspiracy theorists" when the official letter is produced, having been signed by Biden on proper letterhead with the Official Seal of the President affixed and accepted by the Election Commissioner. Note: A slight variation on this was done during the Obama birth certificate controversy. Lots of fake information damning to Obama's case was made available to be easily discovered by those who believed Obama to be illegitimate. When they claimed he was illegitimate and that this information proved it, they were shot down easily by the planters of such information because they knew how to show it was fake. This served two purposes. First, it took those "Obama wasn't born in the USA" proponents out of the picture and second, it fatigued the public. Eventually they grew tired of what seemed like an endless string of false alarms.

4. Claim Victory on the issue of the legitimacy of the resignation by conflating the small battle won over the legitimacy of the resignation letter.

But as I alluded to above, there are many more requirements for officially removing ones self from even an election for a State House seat, let alone President of the United States. I'm no expert but there must be provisions for no longer being able to accept campaign donations, for no longer being able to deduct certain campaign expenses, what you can now do and not do with remaining campaign funds, etc.. I don't think you can just give them to another candidate as was done in the case of Kamala Harris. Are there not limits on how much money one person can donate to one candidate in a given race.? Kamala got around $91 million from Biden's accounts, I heard and many people said, "He's going to have to pick Kamala because she is the only person who can have his campaign donations".

Really? Is that the law?

Why can he do that? Is it Biden's choice? Biden is President, yes, but he is ONE PERSON. Does one person get to decide who the nominee is? If so, it’s a damn strange law. It can't be because she's his vice-President, can it? That doesn’t make sense either. Just one person deciding who gets the money and nomination seems prone to corruption in that it would give one person an enormous advantage over other candidates who got more votes and delegates that that person. The President is just one person when it comes to voting. That’s why candidates always make a showing of going to the polls and casting their one vote just like everybody else.

Anyway, there are all kinds of accounting and legal requirements and document submissions related to accounting and legal that are required in order to withdraw from a race with laws stated very clearly as to what must be done with leftover funds and many, many requirements and document submissions relating to other facets of withdrawal. Hell, they pinned felony charges on Trump for violating some campaign finance thing charging the pay-off to Stormy Daniels as a legal expense (I think) or did it have to do with a business records charge only and not violate campaign finance law. (I can’t remember and don’t care too much). But he got 39 felonies because he had to sign of 39 pages of some disclosure form. That’s why the Left claims, “he was convicted of 39 felonies”! It was all the same case. (that’s MSNBC accounting for you).

And in Biden’s case, ALL of the withdrawal documents require his signature, maybe even all the pages of every document.

Let's see 'em.

I don't think Kamala is legally able to solicit or accept donations until she is the official Democratic candidate for President. Yet I get requests every day from her, for donations. And isn't it too late for her to get on the ballot in some States?

And, and, and... I'll spare you.

This thing has more holes in it that a BB gun target at ten feet.

To finish up on Lichtman's 13 keys. He gave Trump the following 3 keys: 1) Lack of incumbency (ok so he gives this one to Trump because there is no incumbent and it was an advantage the Dems can no longer capitalize on)., 2) Midterm gains., and 3) (Lack of a) charismatic incumbent. Certainly the case- no one would describe Biden as charismatic in any part of his 3 1/2 years and certainly not now. He has gotten to the point where he needs around the clock nursing care. Even two years ago, he couldn't speak properly. The MSM blamed it on a stuttering problem he had as a boy and young man that he no longer had by the 1970s, which was utter nonsense.

Lichtman gave Kamala the following six keys: 1) Got the nomination without having to go through a Primary contest. Wow! You can say that again! Her performance at the polls was embarrassing. She got only 1 or 2% of the vote in her home state of California and dropped out. She got the nomination by securing the great state of “Obama’s Kitchen Table” and secured the only eleven delegates that matter: 2 Clintons, 2 Obamas, a Schumer, a Pelosi, a Zuckerberg, a Pichai, a Page, a Brin, and a Thiel. 2) Short-term economy. This should have gone to Trump. The short term economy under Biden and the Dems of which Harris is an even further far left member than Biden is in or on the verge of a recession. Inflation is hurting everyone. This isn’t because of anything Harris did except for supporting the war in Ukraine and idiotic projects to fight man-caused climate change, etc. But to think Harris, who was the most far left Senator by voting record, and votes for spending money on projects which depend on idiotic claims like “Climate Change is caused by man’s actions in increasing atmospheric CO2” and “the Green New Deal is an economically-viable answer to our energy problems” (and many other idiotic boondoggles) should get the nod over Trump, who had the economy booming until the Covid Fraud was released on the world, is just delusional. 3) Long-term Economy. same here . Harris should not get the nod over Trump. 4) Major Policy Change: I’m not sure what major policy change was written into law during the Biden 3.5 years that would qualify for this nod but the Biden years were FULL of stupid policies like the requirement that business of over 100 employees must require all of those employees get the vaccine. Policies are policies but this one was murder and we knew it well before Biden required it. Lichtman gave it to Harris for some reason. Maybe it was the policy that gives illegal aliens free health care, food, lodging in NYC’s finer Hotels, and post-secondary education since Harris was in charge of reducing illegal immigration. It SKYROCKETED under her supervision. 5) No Scandals on Biden’s/Dem’s watch: Wait a second. This guy is not designating it a scandal that the assassination attempt of President Trump was an inside job that might even implicate Harris and Jill Biden for scheduling speeches in Pittsburgh about 60 miles from Trump’s rally in Butler and at the same time, thus securing the secret service protection Trump would have had access to, to make his site more secure. No accusation here, we just need to know when they scheduled these speeches. If it was after Trump announced his dates for Butler, they have some explaining to do. For another major scandal that the experts say would have put 2016 out of reach for Biden even with the cheating, how about Hunter’s laptop and the 51 Spies that Lied? What about Alvin Bragg where every lawyer says those charges on Trump would not ordinarily be brought and it was politically-motivated? Some of the other charges have been dropped such as the Top Secret documents charges (I think). The lady who claimed Trump sexually-assaulted her in a Bergdorf-Goodman changing room but couldn’t remember the date was probably making it up. Answer me this: Who would try to rape someone in a busy department store changing room where women are buzzing in and out of there all day, when the victim could scream, “HELP!” and 4 people would run in there immediately and catch the perpetrator with his pants down literally and figuratively. Oh yeah, I’ll try that! Thirty seconds of action vs 10 years in prison and the end of my career and name forever. Even horny old DT wouldn’t do that. 6) Challenger charisma. Lichtman gave this to Harris over Trump. They both have some charisma. I personally think Trump has “a lot” and Harris has only “some” but I could be wrong.

OK there are four left with “leaning toward”, according to Lichtman as follows: 1) He has “no third party get’s more than 10% of the vote” leaning toward Harris. He must not think much of RFK, Jr.’s campaign. I could be wrong but I think there’s better than a 50 percent chance Kennedy breaks 10%, in which case this key would go to Trump. 2) Lichtman must think there’s little social unrest because he has this key leaning toward Harris. What about the out of control crime in all major cities with blue Mayors, especially in California where they passed the “less than $950 in stolen merchandise makes it a misdemeanor”-law. That’s a Democrat-supported law. So is “Defund the Police” which Harris supports. So is “lower the bail” which Harris did not only support but for which she was a major fundraiser. I remember when she was so proud to get that one guy out of a Minnesota jail by raising enough money to cover his lowered bail and he went out and killed someone else while awaiting trial on the first charge. Let’s see… social unrest. What about the pro-Palestine group occupying universities all over the country and now Washington, DC or wherever they are taking down US flags and raising there own. I guess we’ll have to see what increases and decreases up to the election. 3) and 4) Military successes and failures. Lichtman is leaning toward Trump on both of these- well, stop the world- because the current Admin had no successes while failing miserably in Ukraine, not knowing what to do in Gaza/Israel so they end up supporting both sides, and is bombing Yemen- perhaps justified- as we speak. Biden, of course, just last week said, “We are not involved in any wars now or at any time during my administration.” Oh yeah, Afghanistan. the withdrawal under Biden’s supervision was an embarrassment as we all witnessed.

Lichtman predicted Trump would beat Hillary in 2016 but that Biden would beat Trump in 2020 where he was incorrect.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Have you heard the latest? Allan Lichtman who has been very accurate in predicting presidential elections since the 1980s is currently predicting Harris will beat Trump. Remember, he uses his "13 keys" system:

The "keys" are:

- Midterm gains

– No primary contest required to get the nomination

– running as an incumbent

– third party running that gets>10% of the vote

– short-term economy

– long-term economy

– policy change

– social unrest an issue for incumbent party

– scandals during any candidate’s last 4 years

– No foreign/military failure

– Major foreign/military success

– incumbent charisma

– challenger charisma

According to Lichtman, Harris has 6 keys, Trump has 3. I disagree as I will explain below. Note 1 : Since there are 13 keys, you only need 7 to win; Lichtman's prediction contest, that is. Note 2: There may be only 12 keys this year because there is no "incumbency". Biden was the incumbent but he was forced out of the race by Obama, who threatened, in a phone call to Biden on July 25, to persuade Harris to pursue a removal from office on him (Biden) pursuant to Amendment 25. Pelosi, Schumer and possibly other major donors put serious pressure on him as well through the politicians in their pockets. In Biden's corner were his wife, Jill, his son, Hunter, and the law. That’s right. The ball was in Joe's court and he would have been the nominee if he hadn't been forced out in the "palace coup". Laws aplenty were broken to get Harris in there and just hand over Joe's war chest (i.e., campaign donations, a.k.a. donor money).

The planning and effort some practical jokers might engage in to stuff boxes in a junior high Homecoming race for King and Queen far outweighs what the operators did to force Biden out. They just wrote a resignation letter for Biden and signed it for him. (Sorry, the signature at the bottom of the letter does not even remotely resemble Biden's automated signature or hand handwritten ones anyone can find). They also forgot to put it on letter head and forgot to affix the Presidential seal). That letter should NOT have been accepted by the Election Commissioner.

Biden is capable of omitting all of these critical pieces but not his staff who ordinarily prepare these types of documents and place them in front of him on his desk for signature. Who prepared that ridiculous excuse for an official resignation letter and who forged his signature? **A word of caution: There is such a thing as "bait, switch, discredit, claim victory". With the forged excuse for a resignation letter, it would work something like this:

1. Submit a proper Letter of Resignation to the Election Commissioner who accepts it (but there is much more to this(see below)).

2. Float the purposefully- inauthentic letter out to the public. [They posted Joe's letter on everyone's paragon of (important business) authenticity, Twitter (X).]

3. Label as "conspiracy theorists" those who claim the resignation was illegitimate by pointing out that Biden was forced out of the race (using threats such as those used by Obama, that would scare someone at Biden's level of cognitive function into doing something he did not want to do ) and DISCREDIT the "conspiracy theorists" when the official letter is produced, having been signed by Biden on proper letterhead with the Official Seal of the President affixed and accepted by the Election Commissioner. Note: A slight variation on this was done during the Obama birth certificate controversy. Lots of fake information damning to Obama's case was made available to be easily discovered by those who believed Obama to be illegitimate. When they claimed he was illegitimate and that this information proved it, they were shot down easily by the planters of such information because they knew how to show it was fake. This served two purposes. First, it took those "Obama wasn't born in the USA" proponents out of the picture and second, it fatigued the public. Eventually they grew tired of what seemed like an endless string of false alarms.

4. Claim Victory on the issue of the legitimacy of the resignation by conflating the small battle won over the legitimacy of the resignation letter.

But as I alluded to above, there are many more requirements for officially removing ones self from even an election for a State House seat, let alone President of the United States. I'm no expert but there must be provisions for no longer being able to accept campaign donations, for no longer being able to deduct certain campaign expenses, what you can now do and not do with remaining campaign funds, etc.. I don't think you can just give them to another candidate as was done in the case of Kamala Harris. Are there not limits on how much money one person can donate to one candidate in a given race.? Kamala got around $91 million from Biden's accounts, I heard and many people said, "He's going to have to pick Kamala because she is the only person who can have his campaign donations".

Really? Is that the law?

Why can he do that? Is it Biden's choice? Biden is President, yes, but he is ONE PERSON. Does one person get to decide who the nominee is? If so, it’s a damn strange law. It can't be because she's his vice-President, can it? That doesn’t make sense either. Just one person deciding who gets the money and nomination seems prone to corruption in that it would give one person an enormous advantage over other candidates who got more votes and delegates that that person. The President is just one person when it comes to voting. That’s why candidates always make a showing of going to the polls and casting their one vote just like everybody else.

Anyway, there are all kinds of accounting and legal requirements and document submissions related to accounting and legal that are required in order to withdraw from a race with laws stated very clearly as to what must be done with leftover funds and many, many requirements and document submissions relating to other facets of withdrawal. Hell, they pinned felony charges on Trump for violating some campaign finance thing charging the pay-off to Stormy Daniels as a legal expense (I think) or did it have to do with a business records charge only and not violate campaign finance law. (I can’t remember and don’t care too much). But he got 39 felonies because he had to sign of 39 pages of some disclosure form. That’s why the Left claims, “he was convicted of 39 felonies”! It was all the same case. (that’s MSNBC accounting for you).

And in Biden’s case, ALL of the withdrawal documents require his signature, maybe even all the pages of every document.

Let's see 'em.

I don't think Kamala is legally able to solicit or accept donations until she is the official Democratic candidate for President. Yet I get requests every day from her, for donations. And isn't it too late for her to get on the ballot in some States?

And, and, and... I'll spare you.

This thing has more holes in it that a BB gun target at ten feet.

To finish up on Lichtman's 13 keys. He gave Trump the following 3 keys: 1) Lack of incumbency (ok so he gives this one to Trump because there is no incumbent and it was an advantage the Dems can no longer capitalize on)., 2) Midterm gains., and 3) (Lack of a) charismatic incumbent. Certainly the case- no one would describe Biden as charismatic in any part of his 3 1/2 years and certainly not now. He has gotten to the point where he needs around the clock nursing care. Even two years ago, he couldn't speak properly. The MSM blamed it on a stuttering problem he had as a boy and young man that he no longer had by the 1970s, which was utter nonsense.

Lichtman gave Kamala the following six keys: 1) Got the nomination without having to go through a Primary contest. Wow! You can say that again! Her performance at the polls was embarrassing. She got only 1 or 2% of the vote in her home state of California and dropped out. She got the nomination by securing the great state of “Obama’s Kitchen Table” and secured the only eleven delegates that matter: 2 Clintons, 2 Obamas, a Schumer, a Pelosi, a Zuckerberg, a Pichai, a Page, a Brin, and a Thiel. 2) Short-term economy. This should have gone to Trump. The short term economy under Biden and the Dems of which Harris is an even further far left member than Biden is in or on the verge of a recession. Inflation is hurting everyone. This isn’t because of anything Harris did except for supporting the war in Ukraine and idiotic projects to fight man-caused climate change, etc. But to think Harris, who was the most far left Senator by voting record, and votes for spending money on projects which depend on idiotic claims like “Climate Change is caused by man’s actions in increasing atmospheric CO2” and “the Green New Deal is an economically-viable answer to our energy problems” (and many other idiotic boondoggles) should get the nod over Trump, who had the economy booming until the Covid Fraud was released on the world, is just delusional. 3) Long-term Economy. same here . Harris should not get the nod over Trump. 4) Major Policy Change: I’m not sure what major policy change was written into law during the Biden 3.5 years that would qualify for this nod but the Biden years were FULL of stupid policies like the requirement that business of over 100 employees must require all of those employees get the vaccine. Policies are policies but this one was murder and we knew it well before Biden required it. Lichtman gave it to Harris for some reason. Maybe it was the policy that gives illegal aliens free health care, food, lodging in NYC’s finer Hotels, and post-secondary education since Harris was in charge of reducing illegal immigration. It SKYROCKETED under her supervision. 5) No Scandals on Biden’s/Dem’s watch: Wait a second. This guy is not designating it a scandal that the assassination attempt of President Trump was an inside job that might even implicate Harris and Jill Biden for scheduling speeches in Pittsburgh about 60 miles from Trump’s rally in Butler and at the same time, thus securing the secret service protection Trump would have had access to, to make his site more secure. No accusation here, we just need to know when they scheduled these speeches. If it was after Trump announced his dates for Butler, they have some explaining to do. For another major scandal that the experts say would have put 2016 out of reach for Biden even with the cheating, how about Hunter’s laptop and the 51 Spies that Lied? What about Alvin Bragg where every lawyer says those charges on Trump would not ordinarily be brought and it was politically-motivated? Some of the other charges have been dropped such as the Top Secret documents charges (I think). The lady who claimed Trump sexually-assaulted her in a Bergdorf-Goodman changing room but couldn’t remember the date was probably making it up. Answer me this: Who would try to rape someone in a busy department store changing room where women are buzzing in and out of there all day, when the victim could scream, “HELP!” and 4 people would run in there immediately and catch the perpetrator with his pants down literally and figuratively. Oh yeah, I’ll try that! Thirty seconds of action vs 10 years in prison and the end of my career and name forever. Even horny old DT wouldn’t do that. 6) Challenger charisma. Lichtman gave this to Harris over Trump. They both have some charisma. I personally think Trump has “a lot” and Harris has only “some” but I could be wrong.

OK there are four left with “leaning toward”, according to Lichtman as follows: 1) He has “no third party get’s more than 10% of the vote” leaning toward Harris. He must not think much of RFK, Jr.’s campaign. I could be wrong but I think there’s better than a 50 percent chance Kennedy breaks 10%, in which case this key would go to Trump. 2) Lichtman must think there’s little social unrest because he has this key leaning toward Harris. What about the out of control crime in all major cities with blue Mayors, especially in California where they passed the “less than $950 in stolen merchandise makes it a misdemeanor”-law. That’s a Democrat-supported law. So is “Defund the Police” which Harris supports. So is “lower the bail” which Harris did not only support but for which she was a major fundraiser. I remember when she was so proud to get that one guy out of a Minnesota jail by raising enough money to cover his lowered bail and he went out and killed someone else while awaiting trial on the first charge. Let’s see… social unrest. What about the pro-Palestine group occupying universities all over the country and now Washington, DC or wherever they are taking down US flags and raising there own. I guess we’ll have to see what increases and decreases up to the election. 3) and 4) Military successes and failures. Lichtman is leaning toward Trump on both of these- well, stop the world- because the current Admin had no successes while failing miserably in Ukraine, not knowing what to do in Gaza/Israel so they end up supporting both sides, and is bombing Yemen- perhaps justified- as we speak. Biden, of course, just last week said, “We are not involved in any wars now or at any time during my administration.” Oh yeah, Afghanistan. the withdrawal under Biden’s supervision was an embarrassment as we all witnessed.

Lichtman predicted Trump would beat Hillary in 2016 but that Biden would beat Trump in 2020 where he was incorrect.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

The second shooter that hit Trump's ear was not in the water tower. The angle to parallel the right side of his head and hit his ear wasn't there. The second shooter whose bullet hit the ear was more or less in line with Crooks and had to be to be able to blame it on Crooks using trajectory ballistics. His handlers told him to go onto that roof, knowing they had their sniper in the two story building behind him or in his building below him most likely. There is also evidence (ballistic audio) that other sounds came from hundreds of feet further away. Maybe from the series of buildings directly behind Crooks, way back. Not sure on this yet. We need an independent ballistic audio analysis and an analysis of the bullets and shell casings. It must be independent. We can't rely on the FBI's analysis.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

1. It was an inside job. Proof: They had an hour after seeing the suspicious kid to postpone the rally and didn't. They had 21 minutes after seeing him on the roof with rifle in hand to get Trump off the stage and didn't. His handlers put the bomb in the back of his car to make him look sophisticated but it backfired on them. By all accounts, the kid was not bright enough to build bombs like that. The bomb in his car just means he had handlers from an organization like the CIA or FBI, advanced enough to have access to realistic looking homemade bombs.
2. Cheadle was in on it but who was behind it? Not Joe Biden. They didn't want him to know. He might spill the beans.
Did you know Jill Biden and Kamala scheduled speeches about 50 miles away on the same day and at the same time as Trump’s rally (south of Pittsburgh, in Butler, PA) requiring pregnant SS details, thus sucking up all the agents and counter snipers in that area so Trump’s rally would be under staffed? Who scheduled those speeches? Did they schedule them after Trump announced his rally date in Butler?

I’m not accusing anyone. I just want to know the answers to these very strange coincidences.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Who is going to replace Joe/Kamala?

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

From July 16. https://t.co/6d3VtZtv5m Who is going to replace Joe/Kamala?

[AG @AGHamilton29]

This is from Biden’s speech to the NAACP yesterday.

He loses track of what he’s saying constantly. Asking people to ignore what’s right in front of them is absurd.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@chrismartenson is a very sharp analyst whom I became aware of during the Covid era. Chris has looked at some audio from the attempted assassination. Chris has concluded that there were at least two shooters firing bullets at Trump, maybe three. 2 or 3 shooters not including the counter sniper who took out Crooks. This is massively important as it makes it look like this thing was an inside job. Take a look at his video:
https://t.co/q5tqzgtkm6

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Yesterday, some random guy with a rifle climbed up on a roof close (in sniper terms) to the rally podium and took five shots at former President Trump. Or maybe he went up in the elevator 5 shots!

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

https://t.co/XmKfgt66d6

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

I explained that the "vaccine" had no chance to be effective and was guaranteed to cause organ damage in every recipient before the rollout. Thanks to Dr. William Makis (@MakisMD) who has been so brave (and correct).

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Dr Makis presents a very important video here. People who have one million views or have been anointed as experts were wrong about everything including the vaccines; the focus here. Why not reward the people who were right the entire time. It will cost you much less, too. There were so few who were correct. In fact, name anyone outside these 4 - 7 people and I'll tell you where they were wrong on a major issue. Please watch this: https://t.co/4ERpTF436z

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

@DrAseemMalhotra @DrTimothyKelly @ClareCraigPath @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @DrSuneelDhand @rustyrockets @FatEmperor @JosephFraiman @Nohj_85 Half said the pro Marxist editor of the Lancet? It's more like 90%.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

https://t.co/pLkIjEEuYP

Caught Red-Handed. I wonder if the Congressmen and women will ask Fauci about this and whether or not he and Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Stephane Bancel, Frances Collins, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Deborah Birx, etc., got the vaccine like they said.
Mr. Homberg reads the Koch Institute's own doctor's words: "More deaths occur in a typical flu wave." People- even my own family-went after me big time but I was right. "60,000 deaths at most over 2020, 2021, and 2022 combined", I predicted and proved. "Three mild flu seasons." It sure looks like flu cases were just mislabeled as Covid, doesn't it? Johns Hopkins lied every day with their CNN ticker totaling 1.2 million deaths during this time. EVERYONE continues to lie about this (Drs. Jha, Fauci, Hotez, Birx, Collins, etc. They are what I call stochastic murderers. I prove everything in my five volumes that make up "SANCTIONED: The COVID Murders". Volume One coming in the next two weeks. I apologize for the 2 week delay.

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

Caught Red-Handed. I wonder if the Congressmen and women will ask Fauci about this and whether or not he and Bill Gates, albert Bourla, Stephane Bancel, Frances Collins, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Deborah Birx, etc., got the vaccine like they said.
https://t.co/V0SbAVeOWg

[Reid Sheftall, MD @ReidSheftallMD]

I'm so sorry to hear about this Rep Massie. I have been trying to get in touch with you to offer my assistance with the Covid Hearings. And now to lose the love of your life with everything else you're doing. God what you must be going through... When you feel better, please drop me a quick note at [email protected]. I would like to do everything I can to assist you. I am in the process of wrapping up my second book on Covid. "SANCTIONED: The COVID Murders" is 2,000 pages long and will be published in five volumes this summer and fall. I look forward to getting together with you. Please accept my most sincere condolences.