This would be cool if sijuwade was correct in this theology sadly he runs contrary to the accepted statements of the 7th ecumenical council which stated the One God is the Holy Trinity any basic history of Christianity will tell you sijuwade is a Biddah warrior on this topic
For we believe that the triad is in a monad, and we hold that the monad is in a triad, a triad in virtue of the three hypostases and a monad in virtue of the singularity of the Godhead, with neither the oneness involving fusion nor the Threeness involving actual division, but instead with a preservation of each of these in the other. For while divided by the numerable hypostases and numbered by the personal differences, it is united by the identity of essence and nature and does not admit total partition.For there is one God, since one Godhead is loudly proclaimed and acknowledged in a trinity of persons, And since God is one God and one Godhead, he is not separated and divided into three gods (the impiety of the Arians); nor, __**since the one God both is and is acknowledged to be three and is declared to be three hypostases, Father and Son and All-Holy Spirit,is he said to be contracted or compounded and to coalesce into one hypostasis**__ (the lawlessness of the Sabellians). Therefore it has rightly been laid down by theologians that **we are to believe in a monad in one unitary Godhead and a trinity in three unconfused hypostases. We do not accept that the one God is different from the three persons, nor do we acknowledge that the three consubstantial persons of the Trinity, who are the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, are distinct from the one God.** Accordingly we proclaim to be one the three in whom is the Godhead, and announce the three to be one, those of whom is the Godhead or (to speak more truly) who are, and are acknowledged to be, the Godhead."
`Acts of Nicea II session 3 synodical letter of patriarch of Theodore the most holy patriarch of Jerusalem(Nicea II Richard price page 221-222)`
Saint Hilary of Poitiers on conditional election ie post consideration of merits a position I used to be opposed to much but as of late my heart has softened to it as it seems the majority of fathers is on this side pre Saint Augustine and all the Greeks near universally from what I have seen
It may be time to finally concede this position of UC is one Saint Augustine held incorrectly 💔
“Indeed, all flesh will come, which is to say, we will be gathered together from every race of men: but whoever will be chosen, he is blessed. For many, according to the Gospel, are called, but few are chosen. The elect are distinguished in their wedding garment, splendid in the pure and perfect body of the new birth.**Election, therefore, is not a thing of haphazard judgment. It is a distinction made by selection according to merit. Blessed, then, is he whom God elects: blessed for the reason that he is worthy of election**”
—St. Hilary of Poitiers (Homilies on the Psalms, 64, n. 5)
Want to make clear again I am not TO I had a brief struggle after being deeply scandalised and looked in the wrong place for answers but did not ultimately stay due its incoherent view on schism and grace if that stops you from watching my content that’s okay!! I’m a sinner who no one has to watch
But if one can separate me from the content as I attempted in no way in the video to be a YouTube character but to just deliver the content then I pray you gain something
As ever forgive me for my trespasses and forgive Nikolai Korea who hates the gospel and will use any excuse
How to become an Eastern Orthodox apologist:
1. Create a YouTube channel
2. Watch 40 hours of Jay Dyer content
3. Read 19th-20th century Anglican works against Rome
4. Buy an entire Schaff set that you probably won't touch