The nazi navy of russia opened fire on a civilian British yacht in west European waters a day after russia killed a man in Poland and bombed a thousand year old Unesco Cathedral in Ukraine.
Not responding leads to escalation.
Sigh. I had to do research for this one. I read every word. I regret it, but I did.
So, here we go...
First, it's a masterclass on rhetorical prestidigitation, emotional appeals, and selective sourcing all dressed up as "science." Let's dissect it point by point.
Sex is binary. Women's safety matters. Kids deserve evidence based care. Truth isn't harm. It might hurt, but it doesn't harm.
He opens up by stating that JK Rowling want us to believe that she's silenced, the lone voice defending women via biological sex. She's not silenced. She's amplified. The truth is never silenced even when someone tries to push it into an early grave. It will always return, fingers bloody from having to dig itself out, but it resurrects itself. Her “essay” which is actually a clear, evidence grounded statement, doesn’t deny sex is real while pretending it’s irrelevant; she insists sex is real, immutable, and dimorphic in humans for excellent reasons rooted in reproductive biology.
Intersex conditions are developmental disorders or variations within the binary,male or female developmental pathways, not a “spectrum” proving a third sex or that anyone can switch. Every human is conceived with either XX or XY-driven cascades toward sperm or ova production. Anomalies don’t rewrite the rule; they’re exceptions proving the binary norm. Painting biology as “never simple” to erase sex-based rights is the actual oversimplification.
Bathrooms: He cites one Massachusetts study (Williams Institute) showing “no increase in crime.” Convenient. That ignores broader patterns such as the facr that male-pattern crime persists regardless of identity. Women and girls report voyeurism, exposure, and assaults in formerly single-sex spaces post-self-ID policies. Trans people face risks too, but the solution isn’t forcing females to bear the cost of male pattern violence statistics. Data from prisons, shelters, and sports shows male-bodied individuals retain advantages and risk profiles. Pretending “the only people getting assaulted are trans” erases female victims. Protect the vulnerable sex class (females) with clear boundaries. Mixed spaces increase overall risk.
Inclusive language: Menstrual health is female biology. Calling it “people who menstruate” isn’t compassionate outreach—it’s linguistic erasure that confuses medical care and denies sex-based patterns in everything from heart attacks to sports physiology. Women aren’t “centered” by pretending their bodies are optional. Public health reaches everyone best by acknowledging sex, not obfuscating it.
Rapid-onset gender dysphoria: Lisa Littman’s study used parent reports because clinicians were (and are) pressured not to question. It’s not a formal diagnosis yet, but the explosion in referrals, especially adolescent females, post-social media demands investigation, not dismissal. Major bodies “rejecting” it often have conflicts (WPATH influence). Correlation with autism, trauma, same-sex attraction, and peer clusters isn’t “alarmism.” It’s pattern recognition.
Youth care: Puberty blockers are not “reversible” like a light switch. They interrupt critical brain, bone, and sexual development. The Cass Review (systematic evidence review, not activist guidelines) found weak evidence for benefits, strong risks of harm, and contamination by poor studies. Long-term data shows desistance is common without intervention; post-puberty medicalization locks in sterility and medical dependence for many.
Suicide rates: Contagion, mental health comorbidities, and rushed affirmation don’t reduce them. multiple studies (including some you’d cite) show no causal drop. Refusing experimental interventions on minors isn’t cruelty; it’s safeguarding. “Literature” from WPATH/Endocrine Society is advocacy, not gold-standard evidence. Cass, Sweden, Finland, UK restrictions show the honest read.
(Continued below. Sorry for the long read)
*Applies for an NYC real estate job*
"Dear hiring manager, I hate jews"
Announcement to everyone: "I'm the guy who hates jews" - sincerely, my full name and occupation
*Becomes un-hirable*
"The jews did this"
This is so ridiculous it has to be an elaborate bit lmao
@rah_66_comanche >After the acute zombie crisis the main issue becomes population and logistics collapse
>Zombies are just annoying things that thaw every spring and you gotta dispose of them properly.
@KicherKoenig@DominionWarship Early-war: the special properties of the Dominion beam weaponry negating shields.
Late-war: The Breen's energy dampening weapon
But actually: Things go pew, things go boom, pretty cool
It should be self-evident that promoting these voices was insane, and that everyone involved in it should be ashamed. They had nothing of value to offer. No new perspective, just racial hatred disguised as cries about oppression.
@CliffordAsness@armsq17@MonocleMan1 It’s mostly not about paying the average teachers more, it’s about retaining the good ones and not losing them to consultancy jobs.
The lives of these young Palestine Action activists have been ruined by university. They were radicalised to the point of madness on campus and now they’re facing years in jail. The whole thing is an utter tragedy and a scary indictment of our universities.
@dewessies@Mirjam152 Ongefundeerd?
Alsof er niet laatst een meisje door een Irakees is doodgereden, waarna de afkomst van de dader buiten het nieuws werd gehouden…
The left last week: Attacking police officers is outrageous.
The left this week: Fracturing a policewoman's spine is fine.
No-one should be taking these idiots seriously.
Dit is echt de waanzin ten top. De hele erfelijkheidsleer, de evolutietheorie en de oorsprong van soorten is gebaseerd op het bestaan van mannelijke en vrouwelijke geslachtscellen. Dat weglaten in de biologieles en vervangen voor vage gendergevoelens legt de bijl aan de fundamenten van de biologische wetenschap.
Raadselachtig hoe dit soort postmoderne flauwekul zo mainstream heeft kunnen worden, tot op de hoogste niveaus. Het tast het realiteitsbesef aan en is daarom een buitengewoon zorgelijk fenomeen dat ook zichtbaar wordt in andere domeinen.
De waarheid is per definitie een menselijk construct, volgens sommigen van goddelijke oorsprong, maar dat concept is in een proces van eeuwen afgetast en bijgeslepen, het is daarom een kostbaar goed. Als de waarheid al te bewegelijk wordt valt de gemeenschappelijke werkelijkheid als een kaartenhuis in elkaar. Betekent wellicht dan toch het einde van de westerse beschaving. Of is dat al te somber?
@Noahpinion Same with Euro-woke, to be fair.
I remember attending university and hearing INSANE American-centric takes applied to Euro cultures where no comparison could exist.
All it did was create very resentful people and their enablers.
Canada seems like it tried to imitate American wokeness (as it imitates American everything), but wokeness didn't really fit Canadian society as well (because it has no large permanent-underclass minority), so it mutated into something very toxic and bizarre.
Here’s the problem. The liberal political class wants us to treat atrocities like Belfast as single, random, isolated incidents. “Yes, it’s horrific, but don’t overreact,” they say. “Let the police do their job. Justice will be delivered. Let’s remain united,” and so on.
But the public can see that such incidents *aren’t* random or isolated. They are, in fact, all the consequence of massive state failure in the area of asylum and immigration. All roads lead back there.
That’s why people are angry.. They are sick of the platitudes that get trotted out after each fresh incident. They don’t want to hear them anymore. They know that the decisions of establishment politicians have brought us to this current pass, and they don’t trust those same politicians to fix things, especially when some of them refuse to even recognise that the public’s anger is justified.
There has been a huge vibe shift in recent years. Imagine - God forbid - there were another 7/7. Does anyone think the public response would be anything like as restrained as it was then? We are in really dangerous territory.
The public don’t want flowers and candles and “Don’t let them divide us.” They want someone who says, “I recognise that the state has failed abjectly. We have allowed far too many people to settle in the country without knowing who they truly are. It has disrupted your communities. Your anger is justified. And I will do everything in my power to put things right.”
Any politician unwilling to articulate that message, fully and sincerely, is effectively sanctioning more years of growing social disharmony and discord. Things cannot heal until those in power recognise the extent of the problem and what it will take to fix it. And, on both counts, most of them don’t.
That’s why the next few years are going to be very, very turbulent.