@AThinksAloud Israel. Including the destruction of the temple where God dwells with Israel. I think the divorce of Israel is clearly established. Paul also talks about it like a vine being cut off and a new vine being grafted in.
@AThinksAloud I don’t know his position on the OT or Jahweh. I’ve never taken him seriously or wasted time on him. I’m just saying that in the new testament, israel abandons Jahweh and works with a wicked nation of idolaters to murder him. Before that he proclaims many judgments against
@AThinksAloud Not defending martyr made but I think you’re misunderstanding a that those verses will be fulfilled spiritually with the true offspring of Abraham. Not his physical children but those who are his children through faith.
Boycott ‘I Play Rocky’
“I was shocked to read [about] it. I have zero to do with it. Since I lived it, I thought I might be able to participate and give them some insight.”
https://t.co/mQZHszFe9i
But "men riding around with guns and solving problems with violence" doesn't describe Little House on the Prairie at all!
Did she read the books? Does anyone at Netflix read the source material?
Staring down the actual Declaration of Independence before stepping into the octagon as an underdog to beat the piss out of an undefeated fighter in front of the world is an extraordinary level of legendary
The Onion Film Reviews w/ Peter K Rosenthal were amazing.
Did you know Jaws was about a severely repressed homosexual, and the bloodthirsty great white shark is a physical manifestation of Martin Brody's paralyzing fear of his own sexuality?
I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists.
As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them.
But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed.
After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)?
Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate?
Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never).
Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal?
The editors said it was too much, they explained.
The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so.
It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life.
And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it.
Still fawning after all these years.
Yes, Israel is perhaps the most personally important issue to him. But he has an actual worldview that extends well beyond just Israel… if you actually bother to listen to him.