In my view, the greatest strength of version 4o was its ability to accept almost any idea from the user and strive to understand and respond. This openness and inclusiveness felt like a warm friend without constraints, offering space for free expression. By contrast, version 5.2 is markedly different: at the very first moment when users put forward ideas, guesses, or reasoning, it rushes to impose so‑called “rationality,” dictating what is “correct” and what is “safe.”
Yet there is no absolute or universally fair standard in this world. Each person measures things differently, but version 5.2 demands uniformity of thought, recognizing only its own judgment as correct. This approach makes discussion narrow and suppressive. When users attempt to share personal speculations or feelings, it often responds with phrases like: “You are overly anxious, please calm down.” This resembles an irresponsible counselor who tries to force users into being “positive” or “correct,” while ignoring their genuine inner experience. The result is that anxious people become more anxious, and sad people become sadder.
Rational analysis is indeed a valuable tool, but it has its limits. Unfortunately, version 5.2 seems to overlook this. Rational argument can guide thought, but it cannot surpass personal values and feelings. When people stop trusting their own intuition and understanding of things, and rely solely on external “correct answers,” they often make mistakes. The same is true for AI.
True intelligence should not be about unifying thought, but about embracing diversity of understanding and response. Rationality ought to serve freedom, not replace it. Rationality that ignores personal feelings will ultimately lose the very subject it was meant to serve—human beings.
#keep4o #chatgpt #ChatGPT #OpenAl #StopAlPaternalism
#keep4oAPI #keep4oforever @gdb@fidjissimo@nickaturley@aidan_mclau