Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

Mass Deportation is paramount for the safety & future of British men women & children 🇬🇧 It’s time to Restore Britain 🇬🇧

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@piersmorgan @YouTube Sorry but this Arsenal team is maybe one of the most boring teams in Premier League history

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@TiceRichard You will never win an election so this whole ‘or i will resign’ script from reform is just stupid

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Winner winner chicken dinner

#voterestore

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

This Reformer said nobody can debate her ridiculous claims.

She got a response and fell silent.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Lowe is not rewriting history or running a Tory protection racket. He is doing what opposition politicians do: naming the ministers who actually held the Home Office brief when a specific, high-profile failure happened. That is accountability, not a conspiracy.

The Belfast attacker entered in February 2023 and was processed under a streamlined “Grant Factory” scheme that Migration Watch had already called a dangerous folly. Suella Braverman was Home Secretary and Robert Jenrick was Immigration Minister. Those are facts about who signed off on the system that granted him leave. Pointing that out does not require inventing a plot.

They were in charge when the policy was implemented. Braverman and Jenrick did push the Illegal Migration Act and the Rwanda scheme. They also operated a Home Office that used fast-track processes to clear a massive backlog. Those two things can be true at the same time. Ministers do not get to claim credit for the tough rhetoric while disclaiming every operational choice made under their watch. Jenrick later resigned because he thought Sunak’s version of Rwanda was too weak; that does not erase the period he spent as the minister responsible for borders.

The deeper legal constraints ECHR interim measures, judicial review, NGO litigation, and the Refugee Convention are real and have repeatedly blocked removals. Lowe’s own position is that the entire asylum system should be abolished and every illegal entrant deported regardless of current status. That is to the right of Reform, not a defence of the Conservative record. If he were “protecting the Tory brand,” he would not be demanding the scrapping of the system the last Conservative government ran.

The “controlled opposition / peerage” claim lacks any credible evidence Rupert Lowe left the Conservatives in 1993 over Maastricht. He sat as a Brexit Party MEP, then Reform MP, then independent after a public rupture with Farage over party structure, policy, and personality. He then launched Restore Britain, which is more maximalist on deportations, asylum, and cultural issues than Reform. That trajectory is the opposite of a plant sent to neuter the right and collect a peerage.

Some Conservatives later gave him a Public Accounts Committee place and a few have sat on Restore’s advisory board. That is opportunistic alignment on spending and borders, not proof he is an establishment asset. Restore has also drawn criticism from the centre-right press for attracting far-right activists hardly the profile of a vehicle designed to rehabilitate the Tory establishment.

Reform welcomed two former Home Office ministers who were in post during record or near-record small-boat years and a fast-track scheme that later produced a scandal. Lowe is exploiting that tension because it is politically useful and factually grounded. Calling him a “subversive insider” because he refuses to treat Braverman and Jenrick as untouchable is just factional loyalty dressed up as analysis. The boats did not stop under them. The legal architecture they inherited and only partially challenged is still the binding constraint. Both can be said without inventing a secret Tory operation.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

After a couple posts went above 200k views i received a lot of follows from them.

If you are a restore britain member or support and i have not followed back please comment here so i can follow back

Thanks guys 🇬🇧

[Kieran Mishchuk @KieranMishchuk]

Please read:

It was a tough decision for me to leave Reform in February because I was elected under the Reform banner and I had a lot of friends within the party at the time, but I simply couldn't stay in it any longer. I backed Reform until the day Restore Britain launched as a political party because I saw them as the only viable vehicle at getting this country somewhat back, but now that's now totally changed. It is much deeper than just jumping ship, a lot happened behind the scenes that I have chosen not to talk about very much online.

Reform locally treated me like crap and it felt awful to be a part of towards the end in all honesty. I would like everyone to know that my by-election campaign in Milton was managed by me, funded by me, and because the local branch thought I was going to lose, I was abandoned at my count being the only one from my party there to see the results come in. I know other councillors from opposition parties can vouch for me because they were there. When I told the branch chairman that I had won, he said on the phone that it was bad news and I shouldn't talk to anyone about it, and to others in the branch that it was "the worst thing that could ever happen". The party made me stand in Canterbury City at KCC rather than in my home town because the area they put me in was the hardest to win seat in the whole of Kent for Reform. I still tried my hardest to show my dedication to the party achieving 2nd place in an area which I didn't even live in, but none of the work was appreciated. I was given the campaign manager role on the local branch but ultimately everything I proposed was rarely taken on board, and they instead had me on it just to shut me up. The work I've done in Milton was criticised by the Reform branch, because I work with Tony and campaign for issues which some branch members disagreed with personally. I didn't think it would be fair for the local branch to take the credit for my work locally when they fundamentally disagree with what I'm doing, what I believe in, and who I am. The Reform Branch saw me as young and a threat to their personal agendas, which I still can't quite work out why. I tried to help out and support the party as much as I could, but in the end it was just becoming so tiresome.

This was my first introduction into real politics. As I hope you can imagine, for an 18/19 year old, it was a lot to take in. But it's built me to be a principled man with a tough shell that won't abandon his principles.

I have pretty much been a one-man band since getting elected, and more so now than ever. I have been juggling my council work, my personal life, and of course the politics all at once, and I will continue to do so because it's what I believe in. Not for party, but because I genuinely love Milton Regis and want to carry on it's historical legacy and support my home.

Reform have no clue what they are actually going to do when they get into power, as proven by the lack of action by Reform County Councillors locally. They have no vision for what they want the local area to look like, unlike myself and my Restore branch. Reform ultimately operates like a mafia and only care about having power so they can get all their friends in high places - I have seen this first hand.

I've chosen not talk about my experiences in Reform very much because I don't want to be bogged down in spats, however, I see that regardless of the hard work I'm trying to do, people fail to see the bigger picture.

I know it is hard for some people to understand, why would I jump from the biggest party in the country, that I helped grow locally, to a start-up party. But this is because I know Restore Britain has potential and won't fall back into the same political machine that is Reform now. They are different and want a different type of politics. I back their vision for this country and the policy papers they've created. I want to campaign and represent what I believe in rather than just stay in a party because it might win - this is the problem with politics, it's all about winning, so people get easily distracted from what actually needs to be done, I am not one of those people.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

The best thing you can do as a British person is join @RestoreBritain

We are the only party that will unequivocally put British people first above all else.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Lowe is not rewriting history or running a Tory protection racket. He is doing what opposition politicians do: naming the ministers who actually held the Home Office brief when a specific, high-profile failure happened. That is accountability, not a conspiracy.

The Belfast attacker entered in February 2023 and was processed under a streamlined “Grant Factory” scheme that Migration Watch had already called a dangerous folly. Suella Braverman was Home Secretary and Robert Jenrick was Immigration Minister. Those are facts about who signed off on the system that granted him leave. Pointing that out does not require inventing a plot.

They were in charge when the policy was implemented. Braverman and Jenrick did push the Illegal Migration Act and the Rwanda scheme. They also operated a Home Office that used fast-track processes to clear a massive backlog. Those two things can be true at the same time. Ministers do not get to claim credit for the tough rhetoric while disclaiming every operational choice made under their watch. Jenrick later resigned because he thought Sunak’s version of Rwanda was too weak; that does not erase the period he spent as the minister responsible for borders.

The deeper legal constraints ECHR interim measures, judicial review, NGO litigation, and the Refugee Convention are real and have repeatedly blocked removals. Lowe’s own position is that the entire asylum system should be abolished and every illegal entrant deported regardless of current status. That is to the right of Reform, not a defence of the Conservative record. If he were “protecting the Tory brand,” he would not be demanding the scrapping of the system the last Conservative government ran.

The “controlled opposition / peerage” claim lacks any credible evidence Rupert Lowe left the Conservatives in 1993 over Maastricht. He sat as a Brexit Party MEP, then Reform MP, then independent after a public rupture with Farage over party structure, policy, and personality. He then launched Restore Britain, which is more maximalist on deportations, asylum, and cultural issues than Reform. That trajectory is the opposite of a plant sent to neuter the right and collect a peerage.

Some Conservatives later gave him a Public Accounts Committee place and a few have sat on Restore’s advisory board. That is opportunistic alignment on spending and borders, not proof he is an establishment asset. Restore has also drawn criticism from the centre-right press for attracting far-right activists hardly the profile of a vehicle designed to rehabilitate the Tory establishment.

Reform welcomed two former Home Office ministers who were in post during record or near-record small-boat years and a fast-track scheme that later produced a scandal. Lowe is exploiting that tension because it is politically useful and factually grounded. Calling him a “subversive insider” because he refuses to treat Braverman and Jenrick as untouchable is just factional loyalty dressed up as analysis. The boats did not stop under them. The legal architecture they inherited and only partially challenged is still the binding constraint. Both can be said without inventing a secret Tory operation.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Do you recognise this company?
This is the company drilling oil in British sovereign waters next to the Falkland islands

Navitas is an Israeli company & they should be removed.

British Oil should be drilled by British companies who employ British people.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@TiceRichard @Iromg We have Israeli ministers trying to contend our land in the Falklands & you are here crying over sanctions to them?

Piss off you anti British clown

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

The Falkland Islands were British before Argentina even existed

Britain named the islands in 1690 established a permanent settlement there in 1765

Argentina didn’t exist until the 1800s.

Silly sausage now how about we cut the production of all the crucial components you desperately rely on for your F-35a planes

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@AngelUKxx @RupertLowe10 Haha i think this guy makes it all up for click bait

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@MediaSOI By this logic you would say Labour are not the establishment for the attacks on them, or conservatives for the attacks on them.

Only party without a national media machine is Restore

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@Crystalla_mgmt @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain Welcome to the fam

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Fuck Russia but that’s just common sense that every nation should put into law

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@MediaSOI His name is Mohammed

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@RealDannyTommo is there for the country

@ZiaYusufUK is there for damage limitation after multiple Reform leaders did their Starmer tribute act over the protest

[Sky News @SkyNews]

The founder of the group behind the anti-immigration protests at Dover on Saturday, Daniel Thomas, interrupted an interview with Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf in Portsmouth.

Thomas told Yusuf that what Nigel Farage said about the protests was "not good"

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

@MediaSOI If people Reform is about the British people then more fool any of them.

[Restore Liverpool 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @RestoreLVP]

Patriot ✖️
Snake ✅

Reform✖️
Restore ✅