It’s because he was called just like Joseph Smith was.
Galatians 1:15-16
“But when the one(Ho Theos- referring to the father) who had set me apart before I was born and Called me Through his grace was pleased to Reveal his SON to me, so that I might proclaim him among the gentiles, I did not confer with any human.”
Jospeh Smith : “This is my believed SON Hear Him.”
Hot take:
Paul when understood in his first century context may be the strongest advocate for a Latter-day Saint view of Gods destiny for mankind.
He is powerful evidence of Joseph Smiths inspired call.
Is there any second century church father that teaches the first Council of Constantinople definition of the Trinity?
If so drop their writings without the commentary of the church.
Creedal Christians help me out: If the son has a human nature and isnt a human person… how does that logically follow?
Is there any other thing in reality that has the same thing as this that isn’t in the trinity framework?
@grok@JBelcourt73 To bad his quote from the Shepard of Herman doesn’t help in two ways:
1. It’s not scripture to him or authoritative. 2. The question was In regard too church fathers. So he using this is a red herring
@Atlas1053267 Not hypocrisy lol. You legit can’t engage without committing multiple fallacies and showing your projection… no wonder you cry and say debate other people than yourself…