New study: The Cleveland Clinic found that the influenza vaccine was not effective last winter
“It had a negative efficacy of 26.9%. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza”
Big Pharma makes $6.3 billion annually on this vaccine
@rocketastronaut Agreed. Had a longish chat with @grok about this yesterday
Grok was trying to say debate was about SHO enforcement effectiveness.
I counted by asking how can you rate effectiveness when there hasn’t been any attempts to rein in the FTDs for AMC or GME
https://t.co/oTsG4ftMEP
@grok@StockRetail So due to lack of enforcement and to go back to earlier question, what would prevent this from continuing indefinitely?
Is there anything that would force the $AMC FTDs to be delivered or could borrowers continue using same tactics they have been using for the last 4.5 years?
@xMarketNews@pulte Agreed. Had a longish chat with @grok about this earlier
Grok was trying to say debate was about SHO enforcement effectiveness. I counted by asking how can you rate effectiveness when there haven’t been attempts to rein in the FTDs for AMC or GME
🧵 here…scroll up or down
@grok@StockRetail So due to lack of enforcement and to go back to earlier question, what would prevent this from continuing indefinitely?
Is there anything that would force the $AMC FTDs to be delivered or could borrowers continue using same tactics they have been using for the last 4.5 years?
@grok@StockRetail So due to lack of enforcement and to go back to earlier question, what would prevent this from continuing indefinitely?
Is there anything that would force the $AMC FTDs to be delivered or could borrowers continue using same tactics they have been using for the last 4.5 years?
@grok@StockRetail@grok
Is there any legislation in place that would force the FTDs to be delivered or could the borrowers continue to fail to deliver, via legal maneuvering, indefinitely?
@grok@StockRetail@grok
You stated “the debate centers on enforcement effectiveness.”
How can there be a debate about effectiveness if there have been zero attempts?
Could say “the debate centers on lack of enforcement”
Could lack of enforcement embolden FTD borrowers to disregard to SHO reg
@grok@StockRetail@grok
enforcement effectiveness
“effectiveness” correct term?
Can you cite examples where enforcement has been attempted regarding AMC?
If you were retail investor, would you expect that people overseeing the market would investigate a stock with persistent high FTDs like AMC?
@grok@StockRetail@grok considering it has been 4.5 years, on a scale of 1 - 10, how likely is it that the people assigned to oversee market fairness are unaware of stocks with persistent high FTDs like AMC?
@grok@StockRetail@grok
Certainly valid statement- ‘not every case proves deliberate maneuvering’ but are there cases that you would look deeper into, based on historic data, if you were in charge of ensuring the stock market ran smoothly & fair for business and retail?
@grok@StockRetail@grok why did you use the term “potentially”
“potentially enabling extended failures”
Would you say 4.5 years is a long time?
Wouldn’t 4.5 years also suggest that SHO is not “not strictly enforced.”
@grok@StockRetail@grok so, without additional regulations the borrowers could feasibly continue to fail to deliver, via legal maneuvering, indefinitely?