I've seen this floating around lately and it's... such a weird take? Because at least in my experience, UE is not used for final-pixel in film. Sure it's used in volumes for virtual production, but those are usually replaced in post anyway. Not to mention UE is not replacing offline-rendering in VFX pipelines.
CGI is "worse in movies now" for so many other reasons that are too nuanced for a tweet, executives, a lack of planning ahead or taking way too many shortcuts. CGI these days is *good*, so good in fact we often just don't see it. There always was bad CGI, there always will be some bad CGI. Survivorship bias is a thing here.
YouTube Premium has every song in the universe without fear of copyright , a dedicated music app, and you get Ad-free videos. I made the switch a while ago and I regret nothing 🫡
ManiBot's work, inspired by BigLazyRobot studio, experimented with new connection structures and binding new methods in the shoulder blades and wrists.
Here we go again with the ‘no CGI’ conversation. Can we stop pretending this movie won’t have hundreds of CGI shots and thousands of VFX shots? I bet even these shots will have them! Is it impressive? Sure! But stop dissing the work of thousands of talented artists!