Nebraska’s “Blue Dot” gets flooded with millions in outside cash, and it exposes exactly why our unicameral is broken.
Billionaire networks (hello, Hansjörg Wyss & pass-through nonprofits) pouring foreign-tainted money into ballot measures and primaries to push their agenda.
Time to follow the money, demand full donor disclosure, and fix the system that rewards dark money theatre.
The rest of Nebraska is tired of being drowned out.
Exactly! Short-term “GDP boost”ignores the massive public charge. Same cause-and-effect failure that’s wrecked insurance: bad regs + ignoring real costs = carriers fleeing states like CA/FL, premiums exploding 40-70%+, FAIR Plans/Citizens overwhelmed.
Voters see gas/eggs. They miss how policy choices create the downstream pain. Net drain is net drain.
The only legal tax they pay is sales tax.
If they pay any other taxes they would be committing identity theft.
The problem being they are a public charge that drains welfare programs far outweighing what they pay in.
It’s all here:
https://t.co/PpgbSeOC8G…
🧵 THREAD: Democrats TEACH voter identification and election integrity ... just not in America
The Democratic Party has an international arm called the National Democratic Institute (NDI). It's funded by $181M/year in US tax dollars. Its board includes Stacey Abrams, Donna Brazile, and Tom Daschle.
But in regards to today's SAVE America Act debate... did you know that the NDI has taught and supervised election processes all over the world?
For 40 years, NDI has told every developing country on earth that voter ID is essential for election integrity. They've recommended biometric systems... yes, that's right, NDI recommended biometric systems, which goes way beyond SAVE America Act! They praised fingerprint verification. Tracked ID card issuance rates.
Meanwhile, Democrats call the SAVE Act "Jim Crow 2.0."
Same party. Same people. Opposite positions.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread 👇
They’re all actors.
That’s why the rare authentic ones like @timburchett cut through the noise.
Professional politicians and their consultants built a full-blown drama farm.
Manufacturing outrage for clicks, donations, and seat retention. They profit while the rest of us get played, divided, and distracted.
Tired of the script. We want results, not reality TV.
Can you guess what Independent running for US Senate in Nebraska has consultant ties to Graham Platner?
We will give you a hint: he also hired a consultant that wanted to show his privates to little kids.
🚨 HOLY CRAP. A bombshell report just confirmed that the groups organizing riots and agitators at Delaney Hall ICE Newark NJ have close to $1 BILLION IN ANNUAL REVENUE — Fox News
NONPROFITS are involved, who get tax benefit status
KNEW IT!!
There's a network of well-organized and funded groups — as many as 100 — including INDIVISBLE, funded by Chinese-linked billionaire Neville Singham, plus the ACLU and more
The entire operation includes public social media coordination on top of private Signal groups, run by Marxists and pro-Palestine radicals
SHUT IT ALL DOWN!
Nice deflection, bro.
FEC filings caught your guy lying about “NO Big Pharma money.”
Your comeback? “Not official + Citizens United.”
That lobbyist check was legal before CU and still is. CU was about super PACs, not this. Osborn’s out here bragging purity while taking pharma-tied cash, no wonder he’s speaking with Elizabeth Warren in DC on the 24th.
I don’t really care where politicians get their money, to a point.
What matters is how it’s spent: Is it funding real persuasion, voter outreach, and policy debate… or manufacturing outrage, astroturfed protests, and deceptive narratives?
Transparency in purpose beats obsessing over the source. Good money builds. Deceptive money divides.
@jryoung234@NEGOP I think whats being highlighted here is how comfortable @osbornforne is lying to a small room of seniors.
How many people in that room went home and fact checked him? How many people in that room would even know where to start that research?
@BiblicalVegan@janekleeb Learning that the money is coming from Epstein adjacent donors, Soros networks, foreign billionaires, scammed taxpayers, and Unions really opens your eyes to the big picture.
Meanwhile in Nebraska:
Dem Chair (@janekleeb) openly brags about coordinating No Kings protests with Indivisible. Providing yard signs, voter lit, and rallies at 18+ sites statewide. She called it a “massive success” while defending the partnerships.
Her party-backed candidates like Denise Powell (NE-02) and Dan Osborne ride the same wave - collecting signatures at events.
Same Indivisible network Reid Hoffman funds to target Elon/DOGE.
The web isn’t just tangled in DC, it’s local too.
Ready to have your mind blown?
Read this very slowly…
Reid Hoffman pays Roberta Kaplan to represent EJ Carroll against Trump.
Reid Hoffman funds Indivisible via ActBlue for their “Tesla Takedown” campaign after Elon and DOGE expose NGO fraud like SPLC.
SPLC funds fake racism for Charlottesville operation.
Roberta Kaplan represents Charlottesville victims.
Joe Biden uses Charlottesville operation as reason for running for President.
Joe Biden appoints Matthew Graves to prosecute J6.
Matthew Graves wife Fatima Graves sits of Indivisible Board.
Roberta Kaplan and Fatima Graves start “Times Up Legal Defense Fund” together.
Fatima Graves and Indivisible run “No Kings” protests.
A tangled web…
Lindstrom’s withdrawal statement cited family priorities + wanting to avoid the “divisiveness of modern politics” and a brutal general (Nebraska Examiner/KETV reporting).
He met with Bacon for insights before launching but didn’t publicly brag about being “hand-picked”. Not sure I need to dig much deeper, the man wants to make difference locally, not in DC.
He was endorsed by Pillen/Bacon/Ricketts, so I am not certain he will run this year. But I’m sure Zach Lahn and Scott Petersons campaigns are motivating for him.
I’m a registered Independent too, and I changed that for a reason a few years ago. Based on that alone, one could assume, that he sees similar patterns as I do.
Scott Peterson and Zach Lahn are both great examples of true “grassroots”.
I see someone who is backed by Nebraskans, who want to see the end of the consulting class in Nebraska.
I don’t really care where politicians get their money, to a point.
What matters is how it’s spent: Is it funding real persuasion, voter outreach, and policy debate… or manufacturing outrage, astroturfed protests, and deceptive narratives?
Transparency in purpose beats obsessing over the source. Good money builds. Deceptive money divides.