@southlondonjohn@London_W4 Excellent!! 98+ convictions to go …. It’s the one’s I have found who got just a couple of years that appalls me …. as I am sure it does you? These were vulnerable children!!
No … I was hoping better information would arrive. Thank you.
1) Do you have a complete list?
2) Would you agree that the sentences meted out to r@pists of groomed children seem very light?
3) Hopefully the detailed minutiae from the ‘hundreds’ of convictions will show Justice has been served.
4) On a personal note, I would have preferred the media had covered these with the gusto to a recent celebrity.
5) Odd that the ‘investigations’ are taking eons; and no additional complaints have been accepted since 2024.
6) Not much point any new victims coming forward then ….
Still proud to be British though … 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@southlondonjohn@Neccccy You mean the one that’s just begun, on 9th November 2026, with a deadline set for 31st March 2029? Another 28 months +/-? How many will have legged it out of the UK by then?
FYI …. Your quote should not be attributed to Mary Shelly. I suspect you feel it gives it an air of intellectual authority? It is factually incorrect. You are right … the accuracy of the value of the Royal family is too complex to calculate. Economists agree broadly that the annual financial benefit to the UK from the Royal Family is £200M +/-. I moot you just don’t like the Royals. And I do on many levels.
May I suggest you repost something like “I don’t like the Royal Family. I think they are privileged and entitled. They contribute nothing to the UK.” ? The broader Shelly family would share your opinions. They were all anti Royalist. Let’s see how a wider UK audience responds?
God bless. RKN