[email protected]

me

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@Togetherdec @EssexPR @djlange @alanvibe @NorrisWindross @DJAndyMoor @SteveBakerFRSA @Fox_Claire @BigBrotherWatch @Francis_Hoar MATE YOUR WEB SITE FORM DOES NOT WORK AND I CAN NOT PUT A PHOTO HERE

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@Togetherdec @EssexPR @djlange @alanvibe @NorrisWindross @DJAndyMoor @SteveBakerFRSA @Fox_Claire @BigBrotherWatch @Francis_Hoar why?????????????

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Standing order 148A (9) does say that the Attorney general is involved in the committee of Privileges, it doesn't say only MPs are entitled to them. And any person can be summoned besides MPs. Also Documents and warrant/subpoena used. (like speaker certificate)🫥🤨

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Please why are some of the non legal "Policy" rules obstructive to, if not serving to deny the right to bring a petition through standing order 155. As your rules undermine it and claim our 1688 bill right would not be enforceable to collect the signatures and run on the site.

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Say no "Commercial adverts. but you cannot claim they aren't already in law, adverts. It is an illegal statement you put out there. How can i take the committee to court!!! i cannot!!! you will say privilege!! yet you say injunctions civil can effect items here. false!! logic!!

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Your rule: It’s an advert, spam, or promotes a specific product or service. PETITIONS ON HERE ARE ADVERTS in LAW! schedule 1 class F of the 2007 control of adverts act, by standing orders of this committee! the definition by the 1990 act "Representation". why not Say commercial!

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP So First... 1. Defamatory content is not of concern because the entire point of the 1840 Parliamentary papers act was to remove civil liability and protect from the courts anything published by parliament under speakers certificate. So its not law it just your guidelines

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP OK here the petition rules https://t.co/6dOzDFyZGK I notice it is hard to find the section on appeals to rejected petitions which existed but i cannot find it so need to check my records and folders for it. But here in the "rules" for what you will not publish..let me raise these

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions QUESTION: https://t.co/GkrEakDvdL WHY do the 2010-2012 committee list look like (5 years after launch) like they are local groups and issues? possibly about local matters??? if that is the case ive been learning from older council model the 1661 act should allow defer judgment?

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Because people were getting warrants & certificates from the BAR. Are they in the session books or separate special Clerks records? As i want to see them, what orders or documents issued, as some were put up in the Sherrifs Gumpter offices 😉 (you know where I'm going with this)

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Hey, Sorry to be persistent! just keen. Hey, pls ASK Simon Burton & Tom Goldsmith. I am buying a session book from ebay that has a lot of petitions that were read out in those sessions. But, I want to KNOW please. ACTIONS AT THE BAR, (orders)(either house) where are those held?

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@ihr_history @UkNatArcRes @RoyalHistSoc Hey, can you please tell me about BB.4017/Pub Petitions to parliament 1833 to 1918 please, as i read that there might be some data in those records besides just stats and numbers, like some context of each petition. Thanks 📷

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP BB.4017/Pub Petitions to parliament 1833 to 1918 institute of historical research 😗

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Where is HC/CL/JO/6/ please the microfilm and or copied across statistics and maybe writs of the 1833 - 1988 petitions destroyed in the fire. as there is some data 😉where is it? everything is being moved! we cannot get access! scandal!!

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP I am looking for the other fact sheet that confirms we can appeal a rejection without having to re-submit or re collect the 5 signatures, its somewhere. HERE P7 says that we can speak to Clerk Goldsmith before collecting signatures, maybe get our warrant, eh? and certificate? 😅

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions @DavidBainesMP Well, i would like a fair chance to get on the first page of results and not be rejected this year, its about the right of subject, sportsmanship fair play and strong opposition. We need to shake this committee up and i am pushing for reform So i want fair right in causes pending

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions IF we are right & correct &pose a very strong political challenge, we should be able to run our petition. Because after all we are opposition. There is no point in feeble opposition. You need to accept the calibre of the challenge and petition when it is either genius, or potent

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions ALSO, a proper appeal should and can argue why the petition should be allowed and is correct or within remit. A lot of the time, it may be something very strong and powerful and well within asking, and well written. potent, but you find it defeating. or LAB or CON do.

[[email protected] @Richard_A_Kelly]

@HoCpetitions I have a major grievance, as the past publication rules & procedure stated we can APPEAL if you reject a petition. BUT you know that you have just been side lining us and undermine that, persuading us to re-write and re-submit. which is a major chore to get the 5 signatures again