@LukeDeCock This is so depressing…been a loyal reader of yours the past 15 years. Always appreciated the intelligence and honesty in your work. You’re the best in the business. Please don’t be a stranger on the OG. Best of luck to you!
@SethDavisHoops One negative…it seems like thus far there has been hardly any wins by mid majors over power conference teams, and the margins of victory seems to keep growing in these games.
@statefansnation I agree with you, but to play devils advocate, I wonder if some of these big games this weekend are even scheduled if we’re still in the BCS/4 team playoff era.
@MLBRaleigh@giglio_OG Just stinks they would give a team to Portland or SLC just for the sake of having an expansion team out west, when NC, specifically Raleigh, would be a better option IMO. Nashville seems like a given at this point.
@SethDavisHoops@hhqsports If the additional play in games only include at large teams, I can live with it. Keep conference champions out of the play in games.
@SethDavisHoops I would be ok with 76 if these additional play in games were only for bubble teams. But I assume some of these play in games would be for conference champions, which will result in less mid major/small conference teams in the field of 64 - that’s not right.