@theblackvault Well, if you know anything about Congress (which I truly do not think you do, besides, perhaps, a cursory understanding), you'd know that they never, or rarely, read reports. Rather, their staffers do the reading and then condense it to the report's most pertinent details.
@theblackvault@OMApproach Uncovering the government's deceit and try to convince everyone just how important a discovery it is that *you*, and only you, revealed about how they used "an 18 wheeler as opposed to a flatbed truck like they said!"
@SPATCHERS @theblackvault Barely anything has changed....except the fact that the pentagon has confirmed/acknowledged, as opposed to deny and ridicule, Congress is now on it & onboard with oversight, videos from military confirmed to be legit released, etc...
But yea, nothing's really changed you're right
@ProudOmaof2@mayawiley If you're against that, well then, you're no better than Hitler!! Wanting to live life while there's a flu going around?!? What are we, fucking animals? Cowards, I tell ya!
@ProudOmaof2@mayawiley Of the nuances of visual social cues. Let's just fuck all the intangible qualities of life & human interaction, like I duno, basic shit like facial expressions, laughter, sadness & anger because that shit is soo...basic? 1000% maximal safety, at all times!
@colwight @OneVioletAthena @jessesingal Jesus. The amount of "intellectual" brain power/bandwidth being devoted to such trivial, semantic shit like this is really getting tiresome. I haven't been this confused since my grade 10 math teacher introduced me to trigonometry!
@RobHeatherly1@LueElizondo@danielsheehan45@mintyhyperspace@thomaslfessler But as I understand it, he hasn't had a governmental, administrative and/or investigatory role, in any official capacity, on the matter. You did mention the word covert, so I'll acknowledge that. You may be correct. I'd be glad to be proven wrong, and I'll concede he seems decent
@MickWest @Tomfortas @TheZignal@GarryPNolan@michaelshermer For that, I am willing (at least for now) to hear you out. Shermer's mistake was labeling himself a tried and true "skeptic." Once one knows where a guy's bias *reliably* rests, what reason is there to continue listening?
@MickWest @Tomfortas @TheZignal@GarryPNolan@michaelshermer I'll grant you one thing, however, you don't add any pretentious snark to your conclusions the way Shermer does. (Or did — I stopped listening to him a long while back due to the unflinching certitude with which he delivered his pronouncements in fields he had 0 expertise in).