Agawan
Siksikan
Walang masakyan
LATE sa work.
After 5-6 months,
ENDO due to habitual tardiness.
Just a reminder, someone promised
*Solve traffic in the Metro
*Wala ng ENDO
Kaya pa? Gising na, Pinas!
MAY PANANAGUTAN ANG MGA MENOR DE EDAD NA NASASANGKOT SA KRIMEN
Marami pa ring maling impormasyon tungkol sa Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act.
May pananagutan. May proseso. May mga intervention upang matiyak na hindi na ito mauulit.
May pananagutan din ang mga magulang. May tungkulin naman ang pamahalaan—sa pamamagitan ng DSWD at iba pang ahensya—na magbigay ng suporta sa mga biktima, kanilang mga pamilya.
Iligal ang pakawalan ang menor de edad na nasangkot sa krimen at may parusa sa mga gagawa nito.
Ang tunay na hamon ay hindi ang pagpapakalat ng takot at disinformation, kundi ang ganap na pagpapatupad ng batas at pagtiyak na may hustisya, accountability, at proteksyon para sa lahat ng bata.
The post is mistaken. Sen. Kiko Pangilinan’s RA 9344 (the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act) set the minimum age of criminal responsibility at 15, not 12. It actually raised the age from 9 years old (the previous standard).
Section 6 of the law is very clear: children 15 and below are exempt from criminal liability but must undergo intervention and rehabilitation programs. Children 15–18 can still be held criminally liable if they acted with discernment.
This is the opposite of what the post claims. Critics like former President Duterte and Sen. Robin Padilla have been the ones pushing to lower the age (to 12, 10, or lower) precisely because they view the current 15-year threshold as too high.
Sen. Pangilinan has opposed those efforts and has instead advocated for better implementation of the existing law — proper rehabilitation, accountability for parents/syndicates, and real support for the system — rather than simply lowering the age.
Spreading the wrong age number only adds to the confusion around this important issue. The facts are in the law itself: it’s 15, not 12.
The old rule came from the Revised Penal Code (Act No. 3815, 1930), specifically Article 12:Under 9 years old: Automatically exempt from criminal liability (complete exemption, no questions asked).
9 years old to under 15 years old: Exempt unless the child acted with discernment (i.e., if they understood the wrongfulness of their act). If discernment was proven, they could be held criminally liable and prosecuted under the regular penal system (with some special rules for minors under Article 80).
You cannot invoke the Constitution only when it is convenient.
When you prevent the Senate from functioning as mandated by the Constitution, you violate the Constitution.
When you refuse to convene the Senate for three consecutive days, you violate the Constitution.
Do not dare ask to be rescued by the very Constitution you violated.
Taga saan itong si dds ate? Ginamit pa mga anak para lang makisakay sa isyu. Sa harap pa ng imahe ng Santo Nino at Mama Mary nagmura at nagsinungaling? May problem talaga sila sa utak.
A @meralco customer vented on social media after her electric bill unexpectedly jumped to ₱7,000 from her usual ₱700, despite minimal usage. She said her household only uses two electric fans, and her television has been broken for three years, yet her electricity charges surged, calling out the government’s failure to protect ordinary families from these unreasonable cost increases.
Saying she has five children to provide for, she also criticized the government, lamenting how she is ineligible for 4Ps, which she described as inaccessible. Despite meeting the requirements—having children in school, ensuring vaccinations and following health protocols—she continues to be excluded from the program. The video went viral amid increasing calls for reforms in how electricity charges are applied to consumers, especially amid rising costs.