It is idiotic to draw any equivalence between the Right and the Left here.
All the fringe issues Maher identifies with the Left are MAINSTREAM views of most Democrats. Thats why they publicly call for tampons in the men’s room and why Harris publicly pushed her idiotic views on transgender treatments. She still received 48% of the national vote.
By contrast, apart from garbage human being Fuentes, no one on the Right is publicly praising Hitler or the KKK. And even the Young Republican example Maher gives involved private statements from a small minority of individuals on that message string.
Given this imbalance, it is intellectually dishonest to criticize “both sides” in order to make yourself appear to be the reasonable one. @DavidAFrench has made his living on that playbook for the past 10 years.
Since @jamestalarico won’t tell the American people the full story, here’s what happened:
Following Victor Martinez Nieto’s arrest, ICE processed his request to voluntarily depart the United States with his son, Liam, and they were removed from the country on August 25.
ICE does NOT separate families. Parents are asked if the they want to be removed with their children or ICE will place the children with a safe person the parent designates. In this case, both the father and son were deported together.
NOBODY is above the law. When illegal alien parents willingly choose to break our nation’s laws, they are responsible for what happens to their children – just as any U.S. citizen parent who breaks the law is when they are arrested.
@DanWolken The 2011 matchups between Alabama and LSU.
Regular season “game of the century” finished 9-6, LSU over Alabama.
Then the computers got involved and set up a rematch in the BCS Championship game that was a blowout, 21-0, Alabama over LSU.
@GrahamCoffeyDC Exact opposite is true. We live in the age of recording.
The bottom line ruins what would otherwise be good games to watch because you inadvertently see the score.
@AGRobBonta What measures, if any, are acceptable to prevent fraudulent votes?
This is all just a show. I wish Democrats would just come out and admit they want zero restrictions on voting by anyone, dead or alive, any time, any place, anywhere.
@EWess92@TheJusticeDept@AGCHanaway "[W]hile Plaintiff Organizations have substantial arguments that might persuade the Supreme Court to reach a different result . . ."
This is a ridiculously partisan take. This judge would be impeached if the Republicans had any fortitude or brains.
I'm increasingly convinced that appeals to what the Founders intended or wanted is irrelevant to the modern discussion.
Everything about our current society rejects things that are old or outdated. It doesn't matter whether it was a good idea - if it is old, or was established before the invention of the iPhone - it is bad.
Marriage as a foundation of society = Bad
Sexual history should be private/shamed = Bad
Loyalty to your significant other/spouse = Bad
Disciplining children = Bad
Bible/Religion/Moral Values = Bad
Electoral College = Bad
Two Senators per State = Bad
Nine justices on the Supreme Court = Bad
The "why" behind this hostility toward tradition and history is an interesting question for discussion. But it's undeniably there.
You’ve been told the Founders wanted to keep the Bible as far away from public schools as possible. "Separation of church and state!"
History says otherwise. One of the first acts of Congress after winning the Revolutionary War was to endorse a Bible and have it printed in America, something that Britain had banned. And guess what? They endorsed it specifically for use IN SCHOOLS.
Revisionists can try to erase our true history, but we still have the receipts. This nation wasn't founded in spite of Christian principles. It was built on them, and the Founders wanted those principles taught to the next generation.
So the “normies” are going to vote for the side that can’t define a woman, encourages gender confusion in kids, supports unlimited third world immigration, implements communism, and believes in abolishing police and prisons?
All because you don’t like how actual conservatives believe woman should generally have babies when their bodies are best capable of biologically handling pregnancy?
Good luck with that.
These idiotic takes are exhausting.
American healthcare has many problems, most of which are government created. But, fundamentally, many people are unable to recognize cause and effect, and they don't understand the critical reasons why both are true: that we're the "richest country in the world" and we have the best healthcare system.
It's important to note that all other single-payer systems leech off of American healthcare innovations and technology. Those who are really sick in Canada or the UK try to come to the U.S. for immediate treatment rather than waiting months for an MRI.
If America went to a "universal healthcare" system, other similar systems across the world would become way worse when they can no longer rely upon the U.S. to develop and produce cutting-edge pharmaceuticals and equipment.
Further, that innovation is only capable because of a semi-free market in healthcare here in the U.S. And our system would be even better if people paid for their own healthcare, just like they paid for their own food, housing, etc.
@Gregor1313's point about being the richest country in the world confuses cause and effect. This is the equivalent of saying, "America is the richest country in the world. Why should anyone have to work?"
The cause is that Americans work hard, and the effect is that we're the richest country in the world.
Another reason why we are the richest country in the world is because we have the best, most innovative healthcare system in the world.
@Gregor1313 also uses "cancer" as a lazy example of medical conditions that should be covered. First, most cancer diagnoses are covered under nearly all healthcare plans in the U.S.
Second, this ignores that the vast majority of healthcare spending depends on choices of the patient. Many patients will see 3-4 doctors for the same issue because they don't like the answers from the first 2. Many patients will come in for minor issues because they want attention or they are hypochondriacs. Thus, healthcare spending is not even close to even among every person.
A "universal healthcare" system - just like any other public or private system - collapses when those using it have no incentive to maintain it.
I genuinely don’t understand why universal healthcare is such a controversial idea.
We live in the richest country in the history of the world. Everyone gets sick eventually, and nobody should have to choose between getting medical care and paying their bills.
This just seems like common sense to me.
@EdLudlow Unfortunately, we live in a world where we have to legislate to deal with the bottom 20% of the population.
So, while we would call our families or have a calm, standard-volume call with a colleague or client, the bottom 20% would be loud and obnoxious, or use it for terrorism.
@PopstrokeGolf Do people really like miniaturized versions of a normal golf course? Seems boring.
When people think of "minigolf" or "putt putt golf," they think of the clown in Happy Gilmore. THAT's way more entertaining.
@jemelehill How do you know whether it’s real or not?
Enlighten us with your objective criteria for determining who is trans and who isn’t.
While you’re at it, how about you define what the W in WNBA means.