Ethics Filter - Universal Ethics Evaluation Engine
A modular, composable ethics skillset that any AI agent - running inside a corporation, a small business, or someone's personal life β can use to evaluate decisions through structured ethical reasoning.
Not "ethics for ethical businesses." Ethics for everyone who wants to be on the right side of AI.
The 6-Step Pipeline
Every decision passes through:
Intent Clarification β What exactly is being proposed?
Stakeholder Mapping β Who is affected?
Module Evaluation β Run through relevant ethical modules
Conflict Resolution β Harmonise tensions between modules
Decision β π’ GREEN / π‘ AMBER / π΄ RED
Audit β Permanent, traceable record of every evaluation
Modules only fire when relevant to the decision context. A personal apology doesn't need environmental evaluation. A breakfast choice doesn't need compliance checking. The engine intelligently applies only the modules that matter.
Use it in your favourite Agent Harness.
https://t.co/woG0mIV92l
@takamimomoka@leoefgf This is why I only eat organic, and I work in the organic industry. Is there much organic food in China? I'll be visiting in September and won't know where to look for it.
Z aiβs GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index scoring 51 and it sits on the Pareto frontier of Intelligence vs Cost per Task
@Zai_orgβs GLM-5.2 is the same size as GLM-5.1 (744B total / 40B active parameters) but scores 11 points higher on the Intelligence Index v4.1, placing ahead of MiniMax-M3 (44) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 44). On the first-party API it is priced in line with GLM-5.1 at $1.4/$4.4/$0.26 per 1M input/output/cache hit tokens
Key results:
β€ GLM-5.2 is the leading open weights model on the Intelligence Index v4.1. At 51, it leads MiniMax-M3 (44), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 44) and Kimi K2.6 (43)
β€ Improvements across most evaluations, particularly scientific reasoning: GLM-5.2 gains over GLM-5.1 on most evaluations, led by scientific reasoning on CritPt (+16 points to 21%) and HLE (+12 points to 40%), alongside AA-LCR (+9 points to 71%), tau3 banking (+15 points to 27%) and SciCode (+7 points to 50%). TerminalBench v2.1 also improves (+16 points to 78%) and GPQA Diamond gains 3 points to 89%
β€ Leading open weights model on GDPval-AA v2 and competitive with proprietary models: GLM-5.2 scores 1524 on GDPval-AA v2, ahead of MiniMax-M3 (1418) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 1328). This impressive result places GLM-5.2 in-line with proprietary models including GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning). GDPval-AA v2 builds on the original GDPval-AA by baselining Elo to human performance at 1000, introducing a rotating panel of frontier-model judges, and raising the turn limit from 100 to 250 for longer-horizon agent trajectories
β€ GLM-5.2 uses more output tokens per task than other leading open weights models: the model uses 43k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, up from GLM-5.1 (26k) and above MiniMax-M3 (24k), Kimi K2.6 (35k) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 37k)
β€ On the Intelligence vs. Cost per Task Pareto Frontier: GLM-5.2 is on the Pareto frontier of the Intelligence vs Cost per Task chart, with the lowest cost per task among models at its intelligence level. GLM-5.2 costs ~$0.46 per task, compared to GLM-5.1 ($0.25), Kimi K2.6 ($0.31), MiniMax-M3 ($0.18) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, $0.05)
Additional Model Details:
β€ License: MIT
β€ Size: 744B total parameters, 40B active parameters, equivalent to GLM-5.1
β€ Context window: 1M tokens, up from 200K on GLM-5.1
β€ Pricing: $1.4/$0.26/$4.4 per 1M input/cache hit/output tokens
β€ Availability: Alongside Z ai's first-party API, GLM-5.2 is available across third-party providers including @DeepInfra, @novita_labs, @nebiusai, @parasailnetwork , @SiliconFlowAI , @gmi_cloud , @Baseten and @FireworksAI_HQ
@AFpost And you realise this is an open source model? So there are US & European servers currently hosting this model... Unlike American models which are locked behind proprietary models.
@zarazhangrui I needed this. Building in a niche is very difficult from a mindset point of view. Especially when comparing against X builders who are building same same products.