Greetings, Sovereign Rincoin Community.
As we embark on a historic 2026, Rincoin continues to solidify its position as the "Pure PoW" and "100% Fair Launch" successor to Bitcoin's legacy. Our foundation is built on transparency, academic rigor, and decentralized strength.
To ensure every member and institutional observer has access to our verified infrastructure, we are pleased to provide the updated Project References as of January 12, 2026.
๐ Project References: The Rincoin Pillars of Integrity
* The Trinity of Truth: https://t.co/EhyVD3gEC2
- Triple-layered formal validation through Academic, Blockchain, and Independent Third-party entitiesโthe wellspring of our **Tier-0 level reliability.
* The Community Portal: https://t.co/jrS7zEW1fv
- The heart of our decentralized movement and grassroots governance.
* Scientific Provenance (Concept DOI): https://t.co/3dAN9JBhMN
- Our open peer-reviewed scientific legitimacy defines the core identity and vision of the Rincoin ecosystem.
* The Nexus of Discourse (Discord): https://t.co/NEpIsARwpd
- Our real-time coordination hub where rigorous debate and collective intelligence forge the evolution of Rincoin.
* The Public Resonance (X): https://t.co/KVXzuFjKkR
- The primary broadcast channel for transparency and real-time updates, echoing our scientific truth to the global sphere.
* Technical Architecture: https://t.co/xbk1aeumEm
- The blueprint of our sovereign code, embodying the Pure PoW and Fair Launch ethos.
* Core Repository (GitHub): https://t.co/txTCjYJqUr
- The source of truth for our open-source development and immutable code.
* On-chain Explorer: https://t.co/Omg6n1atB9
- Real-time transparency and immutable proof of our growing network.
* Gateway & Services: https://t.co/vLWoTk0LU7 (Mirror: https://t.co/JbiqRS7t1N)
- Direct access points for our global infrastructure.
* The Semiotic Anchor (DOI): https://t.co/46GCTCrlHn
- An immutable visual distillation of the Rincoin ethos, academically archived to ensure the permanent unity of identity and scientific integrity. Generated through mathematical constants to reflect the universal laws of truth.
These resources represent the "Integrity" that Tier-1 institutions are now closely monitoring. **Rincoin upholds a Tier-0 level mathematical foundation, transparency, and reliability** equivalent to that of Bitcoin, ensuring our steadfast and deliberate advance. Use these official channels to stay informed and share the truth of Rincoin with the world.
Onward to global sovereignty. ๐๐ก๏ธ
Rincoin-Sim: Supply Accounting for the 168,000,000 RIN Cap
The 168,000,000 RIN supply cap is now accounted for in code. No consensus change -- GetBlockSubsidy() is untouched, and emission is identical at every height.
What the Tests Pin
GetTotalSubsidy() expresses the whitepaper's schedule integral (v1.6.4, Scenario II) in closed form over the Customized Halving phase boundaries, pinned by unit tests against a brute-force sum -- full sweep, zero mismatches. The cap is derived, not duplicated: 800 RIN per halving interval, asserted on mainnet against MAX_MONEY at startup; off by one satoshi, the daemon aborts with exit 134. The integral reaches the cap exactly at height 234,587,500 -- 446.3232 years at 60-second blocks, matching the paper's t_trans -- with S_fix pinned at 31,027,500 RIN.
Enforcement inside GetBlockSubsidy() is a separate future change and will be proposed as a new RIP before any implementation. Five signed commits, merged to master through a pull request; all five are written to be ported to Rincoin Core.
PR: https://t.co/6G5fWv5Hma
#Rincoin $RIN #RIN #Development
Rincoin-Sim v1.1.0.1 and the Rincoin Core v1.1 Branch
The first binary release of the Rincoin-Sim v1.1 line and the Rincoin Core v1.1 development branch are now published on the canonical repository.
Not a Core release and not for mainnet use: Rincoin-Sim is a 1/1000-scale functional-test build of Rincoin Core. v1.1.0.1 is a patch release on v1.1.0 and the first in the v1.1 line with binaries attached. The v1.1.0 binaries were withdrawn before publication after three defects were found (version naming, signet chain selection, bundled README); all three are fixed here. Release assets: a Linux x86_64 tarball, the source tarball, and a SHA256SUMS signed with the same key as the tag (ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA).
Verified Before Publishing
On a clean checkout: make check with zero failures, the three Rincoin functional tests, and the Customized Halving boundary script -- then the shipped tarball re-checked, and the assets independently re-downloaded and signature-verified on a second machine. Consensus behaviour is unchanged from v1.1.0, so the v1.1.0 evidence bundle remains the evidence for it. There is no reproducible build; the binaries inherit trust from the signature.
Release: https://t.co/0qSHjs7Gds
Evidence: https://t.co/o0Mk9eOvio
Archive: https://t.co/Wna9CsfkGY
Rincoin Core: The v1.1 Branch on the Canonical Repository
Following the release, the v1.1 development branch of Rincoin Core is now on the canonical repository -- until now it lived only in the staging repository. The Customized Halving can now be read, built, and run from the project's own repository. The move was made in coordination with the Founder.
Commit signing on this repository begins at c1020be63, the commit that added the security policy and public key; everything from there to the head of this branch is signed under ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA, the earlier commits with the primary key and the later ones with its signing subkey. Older commits predate the policy and are unsigned.
The branch was copied from staging by commit hash, so the objects and their signatures are byte-identical in both, carrying the Customized Halving parameters and fork height (RIP-0002 / RIP-0009), the RIN3 nVersion enforcement -- the hard fork's transaction replay protection -- at both the mempool and block-validation layers, and MWEB and Taproot held at NEVER_ACTIVE on mainnet (RIP-0004 / RIP-0011). Core commits that carry code verified in Sim name the Sim commit they were ported from; Core-only changes have no such counterpart.
Development continues in the staging repository; finished work reaches the canonical one through a pull request and review, as this branch did. It is a development branch, not a release: no tag, no binaries, master unchanged.
Branch: https://t.co/h44SOzQbIO
Staging: https://t.co/olghAFb16g
#Rincoin $RIN #RIN #Development
Rincoin-Sim v1.1.0 is tagged, with its test evidence published first under a DOIโa 1/1000-scale test build, not a Core release.
Rincoin-Sim v1.1.0 ใใฟใฐไปใใใ่จผ่ทกใๅ ใซ DOI ใงๅ ฌ้ใใพใใใ1/1000 ในใฑใผใซใฎใในใ็จใใซใใงใCore ใฎใชใชใผในใงใฏใใใพใใใ
Rincoin-Sim v1.1.0 is tagged. The build and test evidence was published first, under a DOI, with a digest list signed by the key that signed the commits.
A 1/1000-scale functional-test build. Not a Core release, not for mainnet use.
https://t.co/o0Mk9eOvio
The Archive
It holds the build log with a clean working tree, the full functional suite, the pre-release baseline it is compared against, four individual test runs, ten standalone runs of the one test whose status changed, four simulation-script runs, the commit signatures, and the digests of the test files as committed. MANIFEST.md states what the bundle establishes and what it does not.
Suite Results
112 passed, 55 failed, 42 skipped.
Fifty-four of the failures are also present in the pre-release baseline. They predate this branch; the cause has not been investigated, so this release makes no claim about it. One job changed status, and it is recorded as a documented exception rather than absorbed into a total.
Inherited Tests and Rincoin's Own
Nearly every job in the suite is inherited as-is from the Litecoin / Bitcoin Core codebase Rincoin forked from. The tests written for Rincoin all pass, as do the four simulation scripts covering the Customized Halving boundaries, RIN3 enforcement, deep reorgs, and the MWEB lifecycle.
What "Inherited" Does Not Mean
"Inherited" describes where a file came from, not where a failure comes from. An inherited test can fail for a Rincoin-side reason: the test framework computes block hashes with SHA256d while Rincoin uses RinHash, and failures from that difference are among them. No exhaustive investigation was done, so this release attributes no failure.
Clean-Room Check
Run on 2026-08-13: fresh Ubuntu VM, empty keyring, key fetched by fingerprint, signature and digests verified, source cloned and compared, tag and commit signatures read, and the diff between the verified tree and the tag. Nothing in that transcript has to be trusted; every command re-runs against the published record. The script and its full output are posted on our Discord (https://t.co/vg5noThRqg).
Verified tree: e9be3b12e6ff462e00350e10459dd2e0adb87141
Primary fingerprint: ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA
Source: https://t.co/WKvlw910aj
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW #opensource
Rincoin-Sim v1.1.0 is tagged. The build and test evidence was published first, under a DOI, with a digest list signed by the key that signed the commits.
A 1/1000-scale functional-test build. Not a Core release, not for mainnet use.
https://t.co/o0Mk9eOvio
The Archive
It holds the build log with a clean working tree, the full functional suite, the pre-release baseline it is compared against, four individual test runs, ten standalone runs of the one test whose status changed, four simulation-script runs, the commit signatures, and the digests of the test files as committed. MANIFEST.md states what the bundle establishes and what it does not.
Suite Results
112 passed, 55 failed, 42 skipped.
Fifty-four of the failures are also present in the pre-release baseline. They predate this branch; the cause has not been investigated, so this release makes no claim about it. One job changed status, and it is recorded as a documented exception rather than absorbed into a total.
Inherited Tests and Rincoin's Own
Nearly every job in the suite is inherited as-is from the Litecoin / Bitcoin Core codebase Rincoin forked from. The tests written for Rincoin all pass, as do the four simulation scripts covering the Customized Halving boundaries, RIN3 enforcement, deep reorgs, and the MWEB lifecycle.
What "Inherited" Does Not Mean
"Inherited" describes where a file came from, not where a failure comes from. An inherited test can fail for a Rincoin-side reason: the test framework computes block hashes with SHA256d while Rincoin uses RinHash, and failures from that difference are among them. No exhaustive investigation was done, so this release attributes no failure.
Clean-Room Check
Run on 2026-08-13: fresh Ubuntu VM, empty keyring, key fetched by fingerprint, signature and digests verified, source cloned and compared, tag and commit signatures read, and the diff between the verified tree and the tag. Nothing in that transcript has to be trusted; every command re-runs against the published record. The script and its full output are posted on our Discord (https://t.co/vg5noThRqg).
Verified tree: e9be3b12e6ff462e00350e10459dd2e0adb87141
Primary fingerprint: ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA
Source: https://t.co/WKvlw910aj
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW #opensource
Every claim in this document can be checked without asking us.
Rincoin ใฎ provenance certificate ใๅ็บ่กใใพใใ โ ่่ ๆงใปๆๅปใปๆฉ้ขๆงใฎไธใคใฎ่จผๆใจใใใฎๆค่จผๆ้ ใๅ จๆใซ่จ่ผใใฆใใพใใ
# Rincoin Provenance Certificate 2026-07-25
Rincoin (RIN) has reissued its provenance certificate as an independently versioned and archived artifact โ the first Rincoin document to carry authorship, time, and institutional proof at once.
provenance-2026-07-25.pdf
DOI: https://t.co/eDu2ZTY2XD
sha256: 85a34064f5a84d6048675ef2cecf2daba0b675c3502394b54c69a487d70fc39a
Each proof rests on a trust root that is not us.
1. Authorship โ detached OpenPGP signature; the key resolves from https://t.co/YAVLBALPfV
2. Time โ that signature timestamped on Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps, across four independent anchors
3. Institutional โ PAdES signature through GMO Sign, on the Adobe AATL chain
Zenodo archival is the fourth leg, deliberately outside the three: a DOI is a persistent identifier and a retrieval path, not a cryptographic one.
What is stamped in (2) is the .asc signature file, not the bare PDF, so one proof establishes both that the document existed and when it was signed.
---
## VERIFICATION
Download all three files from the DOI above, then run these in any shell with GnuPG installed โ Linux, macOS, or Windows.
gpg --keyserver hkps://keys.openpgp.org --recv-keys ED20B6354EE4526D01F83B538B6E3BF45C714ECA
gpg --verify provenance-2026-07-25.pdf.asc provenance-2026-07-25.pdf
Copy-paste-safe commands are in the Zenodo record description.
gpg will name the signing subkey 0ED9 9C46 ... C16F; that is expected, and the primary key fingerprint it reports is the value to check:
ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA
2029-01-15 (primary) / 2029-01-14 (subkey)
For the timestamp, open https://t.co/y1gPzODAis and supply the .asc and the .asc.ots โ not the PDF. Full details, including the confirmed block heights, are in the Zenodo record description.
---
CANONICAL SOURCES
https://t.co/8Cb09j1cuo
https://t.co/XniTtXkyx4 โ Origin
https://t.co/MHuuW7FwDL โ Development
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW
#Bitcoin #OpenTimestamps #OpenPGP
#Provenance #OpenScience #Reproducibility
#ๆๅท่ณ็ฃ #้ปๅญ็ฝฒๅ
# Rincoin Provenance Certificate 2026-07-25
Rincoin (RIN) has reissued its provenance certificate as an independently versioned and archived artifact โ the first Rincoin document to carry authorship, time, and institutional proof at once.
provenance-2026-07-25.pdf
DOI: https://t.co/eDu2ZTY2XD
sha256: 85a34064f5a84d6048675ef2cecf2daba0b675c3502394b54c69a487d70fc39a
Each proof rests on a trust root that is not us.
1. Authorship โ detached OpenPGP signature; the key resolves from https://t.co/YAVLBALPfV
2. Time โ that signature timestamped on Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps, across four independent anchors
3. Institutional โ PAdES signature through GMO Sign, on the Adobe AATL chain
Zenodo archival is the fourth leg, deliberately outside the three: a DOI is a persistent identifier and a retrieval path, not a cryptographic one.
What is stamped in (2) is the .asc signature file, not the bare PDF, so one proof establishes both that the document existed and when it was signed.
---
## VERIFICATION
Download all three files from the DOI above, then run these in any shell with GnuPG installed โ Linux, macOS, or Windows.
gpg --keyserver hkps://keys.openpgp.org --recv-keys ED20B6354EE4526D01F83B538B6E3BF45C714ECA
gpg --verify provenance-2026-07-25.pdf.asc provenance-2026-07-25.pdf
Copy-paste-safe commands are in the Zenodo record description.
gpg will name the signing subkey 0ED9 9C46 ... C16F; that is expected, and the primary key fingerprint it reports is the value to check:
ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA
2029-01-15 (primary) / 2029-01-14 (subkey)
For the timestamp, open https://t.co/y1gPzODAis and supply the .asc and the .asc.ots โ not the PDF. Full details, including the confirmed block heights, are in the Zenodo record description.
---
CANONICAL SOURCES
https://t.co/8Cb09j1cuo
https://t.co/XniTtXkyx4 โ Origin
https://t.co/MHuuW7FwDL โ Development
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW
#Bitcoin #OpenTimestamps #OpenPGP
#Provenance #OpenScience #Reproducibility
#ๆๅท่ณ็ฃ #้ปๅญ็ฝฒๅ
โ Official Web Infrastructure Rebuilt
---
Hello community,
The official web presence has been rebuilt as a machine-verifiable provenance record. The previous root served a PDF; both domains now serve semantic HTML with structured data (JSON-LD) and a machine-readable index.
- https://t.co/fODoDSOMa5 is the canonical directory: the authoritative index of every official Rincoin property, each entry naming who maintains it. If something is not listed there, it is not an official Rincoin property.
- https://t.co/LNKWuntUh4 carries the provenance record: the whitepaper DOI and its SHA-256 digest, the OpenTimestamps anchor to the Bitcoin blockchain, and the GMO Sign signature. Every anchor is independently checkable.
No protocol behaviour changed here. This is the verification surface.
---
๐ Verify the anchors, not the page
A domain can be compromised, lapse, or be impersonated. None of these proofs depends on one. The DOI resolves through Zenodo, the timestamp is anchored in the Bitcoin blockchain, the PGP key is retrievable from public keyservers, and the GMO Sign signature travels inside the PDF itself. If a Rincoin domain ever behaves unexpectedly, verify against those anchors rather than against the page โ and that includes https://t.co/8Cb09j1cuo.
We will keep publishing records the same way: anchored off-domain first, indexed on the site second.
[Aevust (PGP): `ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA`](https://t.co/Cf2v4bSTRa)
Steady progress.
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Development #Crypto #cryptocurrency
โ Official Web Infrastructure Rebuilt
---
Hello community,
The official web presence has been rebuilt as a machine-verifiable provenance record. The previous root served a PDF; both domains now serve semantic HTML with structured data (JSON-LD) and a machine-readable index.
- https://t.co/fODoDSOMa5 is the canonical directory: the authoritative index of every official Rincoin property, each entry naming who maintains it. If something is not listed there, it is not an official Rincoin property.
- https://t.co/LNKWuntUh4 carries the provenance record: the whitepaper DOI and its SHA-256 digest, the OpenTimestamps anchor to the Bitcoin blockchain, and the GMO Sign signature. Every anchor is independently checkable.
No protocol behaviour changed here. This is the verification surface.
---
๐ Verify the anchors, not the page
A domain can be compromised, lapse, or be impersonated. None of these proofs depends on one. The DOI resolves through Zenodo, the timestamp is anchored in the Bitcoin blockchain, the PGP key is retrievable from public keyservers, and the GMO Sign signature travels inside the PDF itself. If a Rincoin domain ever behaves unexpectedly, verify against those anchors rather than against the page โ and that includes https://t.co/8Cb09j1cuo.
We will keep publishing records the same way: anchored off-domain first, indexed on the site second.
[Aevust (PGP): `ED20 B635 4EE4 526D 01F8 3B53 8B6E 3BF4 5C71 4ECA`](https://t.co/Cf2v4bSTRa)
Steady progress.
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Development #Crypto #cryptocurrency
๐๏ธ Moving Rincoin Core Development to an Organization Account for the Customized Halving ๐ก๏ธ
Hello community,
The chain has now passed its third halving, and development is turning toward the next protocol milestone. To prepare for it openly, we are changing how Core development is organized.
CH (Customized Halving) hard-fork development has so far been carried out under a personal GitHub account (Aevust). As related work grows โ the Core tree, the rincoin-sim validation suite, and other repositories โ keeping it under a personal account becomes harder to follow and to maintain. We have therefore consolidated active development under a dedicated organization account, rincoin-core, giving the work a single, clear home.
The canonical repository, Rin-coin/rincoin, is unchanged and remains the source of official releases. rincoin-core holds a mirror of the canonical history and is where release-candidate work happens โ a staging space, not an official release channel.
๐ค Towards the CH Hard Fork
The next milestone is the Customized Halving hard fork at Block 840,000, which changes the block subsidy from 6.25 to 4.00 RIN.
Release candidates will be published under tags such as v1.1.0-rc1 (the -rcN convention used by e.g. the Linux kernel, v7.2-rc1), for the network โ miners, node operators, and exchanges โ to review and run.
๐ rincoin-core: https://t.co/D72cjU9x2R
๐ v1.1 dev branch: https://t.co/olghAFb16g
Thank you to everyone supporting the Rincoin ecosystem.
Steady progress.
Aevust, in collaboration with ไธๅคๅ (Founder, ysmreg)
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Development #Crypto #cryptocurrency
๐๏ธ Moving Rincoin Core Development to an Organization Account for the Customized Halving ๐ก๏ธ
Hello community,
The chain has now passed its third halving, and development is turning toward the next protocol milestone. To prepare for it openly, we are changing how Core development is organized.
CH (Customized Halving) hard-fork development has so far been carried out under a personal GitHub account (Aevust). As related work grows โ the Core tree, the rincoin-sim validation suite, and other repositories โ keeping it under a personal account becomes harder to follow and to maintain. We have therefore consolidated active development under a dedicated organization account, rincoin-core, giving the work a single, clear home.
The canonical repository, Rin-coin/rincoin, is unchanged and remains the source of official releases. rincoin-core holds a mirror of the canonical history and is where release-candidate work happens โ a staging space, not an official release channel.
๐ค Towards the CH Hard Fork
The next milestone is the Customized Halving hard fork at Block 840,000, which changes the block subsidy from 6.25 to 4.00 RIN.
Release candidates will be published under tags such as v1.1.0-rc1 (the -rcN convention used by e.g. the Linux kernel, v7.2-rc1), for the network โ miners, node operators, and exchanges โ to review and run.
๐ rincoin-core: https://t.co/D72cjU9x2R
๐ v1.1 dev branch: https://t.co/olghAFb16g
Thank you to everyone supporting the Rincoin ecosystem.
Steady progress.
Aevust, in collaboration with ไธๅคๅ (Founder, ysmreg)
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Development #Crypto #cryptocurrency
๐๏ธ Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 Release & Litecoin Contribution Follow-Up ๐๏ธ
---
Greetings, community!
Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 (1/1000 scale) is now available โ the validation environment for the Block 840,000 hard fork (CH + RIN3).
---
๐ What this release validates
โ Customized Halving โ BVA across all phase boundaries (PASS 8/8)
โ RIN3 nVersion enforcement + BVA + attack resilience (PASS 35/35)
โ Taproot sealed NEVER_ACTIVE (unit-tested, versionbits_sanity passes)
โ MWEB peg-in / peg-out / reorg lifecycle
โ Deep-reorg resilience โ up to 5,461-block full CH-history erasure (PASS 28/28)
๐ ๏ธ For those building from source:
โ test/functional/feature_rin3_enforcement.py (v3) - 10 subtests all PASS
Covers RIN3 consensus-level block rejection at hโฅ840 (scaled from 840,000), mempool Zombie-DoS defense (PreChecks), and coinbase exemption. Requires source tree build + python3 venv (blake3, argon2-cffi).
---
๐ Verification trail
๐ GPG signature: https://t.co/Cf2v4bSTRa
๐ Test evidence (Zenodo): https://t.co/VHPe7cxQb8
๐ฌ Release binaries: https://t.co/rr4mgnYXzJ
๐ Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 DOI: https://t.co/5u1gCn46xF
- Technical Specifications: `doc/release-notes/rincoin-sim/sim-release-notes-1.0.7.md`
- Compilation Guidelines: `doc/build-unix-rincoin-sim.md`
---
๐ Contribution to Litecoin upstream ๐ค
A follow-up on the `chainparams.cpp` parser bug (Issue #1095) we found while developing and analyzing Rincoin: On 2026-06-12, the issue was assigned (self-assigned) by David Burkett (the lead MWEB developer on Litecoin).
The root cause is the uninitialized local variables `nStartHeight` and `nTimeoutHeight`, which lack default values. Because it is a concise one-line fix, we reported it as an issue rather than a PR, leaving the correction to be applied directly upstream.
๐ https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
Our thanks to the Litecoin community. We will share an update on the Bitcoin-Seeder contribution as it progresses.
---
The Rincoin community moves forward steadily. Thank you for building alongside us. ๐
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
Aevust
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Bitcoin #Litecoin #Development #Contribution
๐๏ธ Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 Release & Litecoin Contribution Follow-Up ๐๏ธ
---
Greetings, community!
Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 (1/1000 scale) is now available โ the validation environment for the Block 840,000 hard fork (CH + RIN3).
---
๐ What this release validates
โ Customized Halving โ BVA across all phase boundaries (PASS 8/8)
โ RIN3 nVersion enforcement + BVA + attack resilience (PASS 35/35)
โ Taproot sealed NEVER_ACTIVE (unit-tested, versionbits_sanity passes)
โ MWEB peg-in / peg-out / reorg lifecycle
โ Deep-reorg resilience โ up to 5,461-block full CH-history erasure (PASS 28/28)
๐ ๏ธ For those building from source:
โ test/functional/feature_rin3_enforcement.py (v3) - 10 subtests all PASS
Covers RIN3 consensus-level block rejection at hโฅ840 (scaled from 840,000), mempool Zombie-DoS defense (PreChecks), and coinbase exemption. Requires source tree build + python3 venv (blake3, argon2-cffi).
---
๐ Verification trail
๐ GPG signature: https://t.co/Cf2v4bSTRa
๐ Test evidence (Zenodo): https://t.co/VHPe7cxQb8
๐ฌ Release binaries: https://t.co/rr4mgnYXzJ
๐ Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 DOI: https://t.co/5u1gCn46xF
- Technical Specifications: `doc/release-notes/rincoin-sim/sim-release-notes-1.0.7.md`
- Compilation Guidelines: `doc/build-unix-rincoin-sim.md`
---
๐ Contribution to Litecoin upstream ๐ค
A follow-up on the `chainparams.cpp` parser bug (Issue #1095) we found while developing and analyzing Rincoin: On 2026-06-12, the issue was assigned (self-assigned) by David Burkett (the lead MWEB developer on Litecoin).
The root cause is the uninitialized local variables `nStartHeight` and `nTimeoutHeight`, which lack default values. Because it is a concise one-line fix, we reported it as an issue rather than a PR, leaving the correction to be applied directly upstream.
๐ https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
Our thanks to the Litecoin community. We will share an update on the Bitcoin-Seeder contribution as it progresses.
---
The Rincoin community moves forward steadily. Thank you for building alongside us. ๐
Correctness over speed. Verification over publication.
Aevust
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Bitcoin #Litecoin #Development #Contribution
โก Rincoin Updates & Bitcoin Seeder Build Fix: glibc 2.38+ Compatibility
---
Greetings, Community!
Following our previous upstream bug report to Litecoin (Issue #1095), we have shared a Bitcoin-Seeder fix upstream (Issue #109).
We have implemented a fix for a build issue affecting the standard `bitcoin-seeder` (and by extension, our own `rincoin-seeder`).
---
๐ฌ The Issue
When compiling the seeder on modern Linux distributions (Ubuntu 24.04 with glibc 2.38+), the build fails with a fatal `redeclared inline` error caused by a declaration collision with `strlcpy`/`strlcat`.
Known workaroundsโremoving bundled files or disabling compiler security features via `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0`โare not acceptable for production infrastructure.
---
๐ก๏ธ Our Solution
We implemented a compiler-level macro guard (`__GLIBC_PREREQ` and `__USE_MISC`). This allows the seeder to compile cleanly on modern systems without disabling fortified security features, while maintaining compatibility with older systems.
We have shared our root-cause analysis and the fix with the upstream `bitcoin-seeder` repository (maintained by Pieter Wuille / sipa, a longtime Bitcoin developer and former Bitcoin Core maintainer, known for SegWit and libsecp256k1):
- ๐ Upstream Issue Report & Comment (Bitcoin-Seeder): https://t.co/8Y7QQYKoX8
- ๐ Upstream Issue Report (Litecoin Issue #1095): https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
---
๐ท๏ธ Rincoin Rebrand
As part of this update, the repository files have been fully rebranded from `bitcoin-seeder` to `rincoin-seeder`: source files renamed, include guards updated, Rincoin network parameters applied (P2P port `9555`, seed host `seed.rincoin. org`), and copyright headers added with attribution to the original `bitcoin-seeder` by sipa.
We have also submitted a Pull Request to integrate this fix into our own `rincoin-seeder` repository:
- ๐ Rincoin Seeder PR: https://t.co/oLbVk3SDMT
We build Rincoin. Where that work benefits Bitcoin and Litecoin upstream, we share it. ๐
Steady progress. ๐ป
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Bitcoin #Litecoin #Seeder #Development #Contribution
โก Rincoin Updates & Bitcoin Seeder Build Fix: glibc 2.38+ Compatibility
---
Greetings, Community!
Following our previous upstream bug report to Litecoin (Issue #1095), we have shared a Bitcoin-Seeder fix upstream (Issue #109).
We have implemented a fix for a build issue affecting the standard `bitcoin-seeder` (and by extension, our own `rincoin-seeder`).
---
๐ฌ The Issue
When compiling the seeder on modern Linux distributions (Ubuntu 24.04 with glibc 2.38+), the build fails with a fatal `redeclared inline` error caused by a declaration collision with `strlcpy`/`strlcat`.
Known workaroundsโremoving bundled files or disabling compiler security features via `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0`โare not acceptable for production infrastructure.
---
๐ก๏ธ Our Solution
We implemented a compiler-level macro guard (`__GLIBC_PREREQ` and `__USE_MISC`). This allows the seeder to compile cleanly on modern systems without disabling fortified security features, while maintaining compatibility with older systems.
We have shared our root-cause analysis and the fix with the upstream `bitcoin-seeder` repository (maintained by Pieter Wuille / sipa, a longtime Bitcoin developer and former Bitcoin Core maintainer, known for SegWit and libsecp256k1):
- ๐ Upstream Issue Report & Comment (Bitcoin-Seeder): https://t.co/8Y7QQYKoX8
- ๐ Upstream Issue Report (Litecoin Issue #1095): https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
---
๐ท๏ธ Rincoin Rebrand
As part of this update, the repository files have been fully rebranded from `bitcoin-seeder` to `rincoin-seeder`: source files renamed, include guards updated, Rincoin network parameters applied (P2P port `9555`, seed host `seed.rincoin. org`), and copyright headers added with attribution to the original `bitcoin-seeder` by sipa.
We have also submitted a Pull Request to integrate this fix into our own `rincoin-seeder` repository:
- ๐ Rincoin Seeder PR: https://t.co/oLbVk3SDMT
We build Rincoin. Where that work benefits Bitcoin and Litecoin upstream, we share it. ๐
Steady progress. ๐ป
#Rincoin #RIN $RIN #PoW #Bitcoin #Litecoin #Seeder #Development #Contribution
๐๏ธ Updates: Simulation Milestones & Security Contributions
---
Hello Rincoin Community! ๐ฅ
The Rincoin Core Team continues to direct our primary engineering resources toward the upcoming **Customized Halving (CH) hard fork**, scheduled to activate at Block 840,000. We are pleased to share several technical milestones with you today.
---
๐ฌ 1. Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 & Open Science Transparency
We have successfully completed the testing phases for `sim-ch-attack`, `sim-ch-rin3`, and `feature-rin3-enforcement` within our simulation environment.
To ensure transparency and academic rigor, all future simulation results and datasets will be officially archived and publicly accessible via Zenodo.
๐ DOI: https://t.co/VHPe7cxQb8
---
๐ก๏ธ 2. Upstream Security Contributions (Litecoin Bug Disclosure)
During our code analysis and network simulations, our team identified a consensus-layer issue shared with the upstream Litecoin codebase.
We have responsibly disclosed this issue to the Litecoin development team:
๐ https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
As we remain focused on Rincoin Core development, we are also committed to giving back to the broader Bitcoin and Litecoin open-source ecosystems.
---
๐ 3. Roadmap for June
We are targeting June for the official release of **Sim v1.0.7**, followed by the optimized integration of these thoroughly tested features into **Rincoin Core v1.0.7** โ a significant step forward in finalizing the CH hard fork implementation.
---
**Thank you for your continued support. We are building something robust together. ๐**
Steady progress. ๐ป
๐๏ธ Updates: Simulation Milestones & Security Contributions
---
Hello Rincoin Community! ๐ฅ
The Rincoin Core Team continues to direct our primary engineering resources toward the upcoming **Customized Halving (CH) hard fork**, scheduled to activate at Block 840,000. We are pleased to share several technical milestones with you today.
---
๐ฌ 1. Rincoin-Sim v1.0.7 & Open Science Transparency
We have successfully completed the testing phases for `sim-ch-attack`, `sim-ch-rin3`, and `feature-rin3-enforcement` within our simulation environment.
To ensure transparency and academic rigor, all future simulation results and datasets will be officially archived and publicly accessible via Zenodo.
๐ DOI: https://t.co/VHPe7cxQb8
---
๐ก๏ธ 2. Upstream Security Contributions (Litecoin Bug Disclosure)
During our code analysis and network simulations, our team identified a consensus-layer issue shared with the upstream Litecoin codebase.
We have responsibly disclosed this issue to the Litecoin development team:
๐ https://t.co/xCrUzdGPOf
As we remain focused on Rincoin Core development, we are also committed to giving back to the broader Bitcoin and Litecoin open-source ecosystems.
---
๐ 3. Roadmap for June
We are targeting June for the official release of **Sim v1.0.7**, followed by the optimized integration of these thoroughly tested features into **Rincoin Core v1.0.7** โ a significant step forward in finalizing the CH hard fork implementation.
---
**Thank you for your continued support. We are building something robust together. ๐**
Steady progress. ๐ป
โ๏ธ Official Update: Rincoin Core v1.0.6 & Whitepaper v1.6.3 ๐
---
Greetings, Our Valued Community!
Thank you for your continuous support of the Rincoin ecosystem. Today, we are sharing three updates on the ongoing development of the Rincoin protocol.
---
โ๏ธ 1. Scientific Milestone v1.6.3
Our paper "On the Convergence of Regenerative Thermodynamic Security and Economic Incentives" has been updated. Major additions:
โข Cryptographic Quarantine (Sec 6.4.4): Phased migration protocol for legacy assets reaching the cryptographic event horizon.
โข Sensitivity Boundaries (Sec 6.7): Statistical decoupling threshold validated up to `ฮผ = 1.9%` via Monte Carlo simulation (`N = 1,000,000`).
โข MEV Section: Empirical findings on rational user behavior and network decentralization.
๐ DOI: https://t.co/JI8Piaygeb
---
๐๏ธ 2. Infrastructure: Core v1.0.6 in Production
The official Fulcrum server has been upgraded to Rincoin Core v1.0.6, joining the SEED server already running on this version. Two production nodes are now operating on v1.0.6.
We have agreed with Founder Ysmreg to submit a pull request to the official repository upon the completion of the current testing period.
---
๐ค 3. Simulation Suite Hardening
Added a hardware safety guard to `sde_zkp_recovery_overlay.py`, setting the default `NUM_SIMS` to 20,000 and capping the maximum limit at 100,000 to prevent OOM crashes on standard hardware.
To reproduce the paper figures at full precision (500,000โ1,000,000 simulations), ensure sufficient RAM (16โ32 GB) and comment out the safety device code as documented.
๐ https://t.co/f3w27zYqyZ
---
We deeply appreciate your ongoing support and will continue to dedicate ourselves to research and development. ๐
Steady progress. ๐
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW #OpenSource #Decentralization #Crypto
โ๏ธ Official Update: Rincoin Core v1.0.6 & Whitepaper v1.6.3 ๐
---
Greetings, Our Valued Community!
Thank you for your continuous support of the Rincoin ecosystem. Today, we are sharing three updates on the ongoing development of the Rincoin protocol.
---
โ๏ธ 1. Scientific Milestone v1.6.3
Our paper "On the Convergence of Regenerative Thermodynamic Security and Economic Incentives" has been updated. Major additions:
โข Cryptographic Quarantine (Sec 6.4.4): Phased migration protocol for legacy assets reaching the cryptographic event horizon.
โข Sensitivity Boundaries (Sec 6.7): Statistical decoupling threshold validated up to `ฮผ = 1.9%` via Monte Carlo simulation (`N = 1,000,000`).
โข MEV Section: Empirical findings on rational user behavior and network decentralization.
๐ DOI: https://t.co/JI8Piaygeb
---
๐๏ธ 2. Infrastructure: Core v1.0.6 in Production
The official Fulcrum server has been upgraded to Rincoin Core v1.0.6, joining the SEED server already running on this version. Two production nodes are now operating on v1.0.6.
We have agreed with Founder Ysmreg to submit a pull request to the official repository upon the completion of the current testing period.
---
๐ค 3. Simulation Suite Hardening
Added a hardware safety guard to `sde_zkp_recovery_overlay.py`, setting the default `NUM_SIMS` to 20,000 and capping the maximum limit at 100,000 to prevent OOM crashes on standard hardware.
To reproduce the paper figures at full precision (500,000โ1,000,000 simulations), ensure sufficient RAM (16โ32 GB) and comment out the safety device code as documented.
๐ https://t.co/f3w27zYqyZ
---
We deeply appreciate your ongoing support and will continue to dedicate ourselves to research and development. ๐
Steady progress. ๐
#Rincoin $RIN #PoW #OpenSource #Decentralization #Crypto