Rising Zoomer

Praise/God

Christian Conservative trying to learn all he can about the crazy world we live in.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

Neutrality is a lie
All politics is theological
Power abhors a vacuum

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

Democracy is not a Christian ideology, nor a conservative one.
It is a progressive, secular, humanistic rot devouring the soul of the West.
But accelerationism never breeds anything but destruction.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

Third World migration is an existential threat to Western civilization, yet Progressives will refuse to ever admit this because it’s “mean” to do so according to their ideology’s metaphysics.

There is no collectivity that can ever be named as a civilizational rival of the West because that would violate the tenets of liberal universalism. And yet, at the same time, the “Far Right” must be named as an existential enemy because they continue to expose that the entire premise of liberal universalism is a lie.

They have been warning for years, decades even, that people and civilizations are not interchangeable and that when we try to pretend that they are, reality returns in the most brutal possible way.

And yet, no matter how many stabbing or rapes or murders or terrorist attacks or dead kids or mutilated people there are lying on the streets, Progressives will never declare that the Third World is a civilizational threat to the very nations they rule. Their ire will only ever be directed against those who point this out.

They are literally incapable of doing anything else because they’re being true to the metaphysical rules of their own religion.

In the Progressive mind, the highest moral truth is the interchangeability of human beings under a system of equal and universal rights. Therefore, to argue that mass migration from radically different civilizations may dissolve one’s own is an act of blasphemy.

Because if that is true, then liberal universalism is false.

The knife wielding Sudanese migrant can be dealt with by the legal system. But the “Far Right” anon on the internet pointing out that these people are literally incompatible with Western civilization itself is a FAR greater threat to the Progressive ruling class than any lone maniac ever will be.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I want people finally held to account for what has been done to our country.

Civil servants, judges, politicians.

If they have knowingly placed unvetted dangerous third world savages in our communities, near our children, then a Restore Britain Government will aim to prosecute them.

If that includes Reform’s Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman, then so be it.

When they held the power - they welcomed that Sudanese monster into our country and handed him a visa. An attempted beheading followed their decision.

Those responsible must be held to account.

And I want to send a very clear message to officials planning to place more of these men in communities across Britain - near schools, nurseries, families.

When Restore Britain wins the next election, we will pursue you with the full power of the state.

That will apply retrospectively.

If those in power are made to feel the consequences of their decisions, the quality of those decisions will improve.

We are so far past half-measures now, the country is too far gone.

Britain needs a democratic revolution.

That is exactly what Restore Britain is going to do.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

I don’t know man. Maybe literally every civilization on the planet for all of history was right this entire time and we are the crazy ones for thinking to ourselves that women’s opinions on matters of state are somehow indispensable to building and maintaining a flourishing society.

[Tim Pool @Timcast]

Spider Noir is great

Good show

Nic Cage is the best

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

No one actually exists outside of inherited obligations. You are born into a particular family, with a particular language and history. You are born with a particular sex, from a particular lineage, in a particular nation, with a particular culture, and during a particular era.

There's nothing "universal" about you, and there's nothing voluntary or chosen about what makes you, "you" either.

The Enlightenment-era idea of "universal man" free from constraint is a total lie, and to demand absolute freedom from the very inherited obligations that make you who you are is to declare war on yourself.

Which is why Liberals are disproportionately mentally ill, unhappy with themselves, susceptible to self-multilating pathologies like transgenderism, and have a collapsing birth rate.

[Phrog ☆ Jesus Fangirl @PhrogPollen]

GUYS SEXUALLY DESIRING SOMEONE WHO IS NOT YOUR HUSBAND OR WIFE IS THE DEFINITION OF LUST AND IS A SIN
Calling it God-given is blasphemy. Calling it natural and normal is complacency.
Stop coping and read your Bible, holy crapppp did not expect to have to argue with literal *Christians* about this.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

The lesson from this mass crash out is quite simple.

Do not pander to Libertarians, ever. These people cannot be satiated in any way and there is no point in ever trying to court them. The moment you do, they begin to act like they own you. They have no sense of courtesy, no sense of loyalty, and regularly treat their own “allies” worse than they do their stated enemies.

These people will genuinely take someone who agrees with them 80% of the time, and abuse them to no end even as they lavish praise upon someone who agrees with them just 20% of the time.

It is preferable to simply be their enemy right from the start than it is to try and win them over. Don’t give these people the option to be on your side. Force them to become Democrats like they’ve always wanted to be. They’ll destroy the Dems from within anyway because Libertarianism is an inherently anti-political ideology that has no idea how to seize power and wield it.

There are some with a libertarian-ish mindset who genuinely hate Progressive managerialism, central banking, and the Federal administrative state. These people are friends, not enemies. The problem isn’t with each and every person who may call themselves a “libertarian” or a “liberty-minded conservative”. The problem is with Libertarianism as a governing philosophy.

It is useful as an acid and little more. Libertarianism can dissolve power, but it cannot build a lasting political order.

We are entering an age where order must be reestablished. And this makes Libertarianism not only incompatible with the Right, but actually antagonistic.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

There's a certain demographic of contrarian malcontents who are so mindraped by Epstein and Israel that they immediately become a net negative for any political movement they latch themselves on to.

These people contribute nothing to any political fight they engage in. They knock on zero doors. They donate $0. They volunteer on zero campaigns. They do absolutely no organizational work whatsoever, even as they rage online about how stupid and ineffective everyone else is. And when election season rolls around, it's a 50/50 proposition whether they even show up because they usually talk themselves into sabotaging whatever movement they claim to be part of.

Let guys like you finally become the Left's problem to deal with. There comes a point when your vote isn't worth chasing. Having people like this as a political ally is the equivalent of having Italy fight on your side in a World War.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@LizzieMarbach The Christian women just read an insane amount of erotica because they think that's less bad than porn. They read more of that than men watch porn. And it's just as damaging as porn for them.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@MeghanEMurphy True.
There is a difference, I will note, between men who don't use porn and men who have never struggled with porn.

Women who refuse to date men who have ever struggled with porn are in complete denial of reality, high maintenance, and will not land a worthwhile man.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@memechaotic Who you love most is not the same as who you are most responsible for.
In a healthy marriage, you should love your spouse more than your kids. Simultaneously, you should prioritize the needs and safety of your kids above that of you and your partner.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@jakozloski The pattern is dating apps and the internet corrupting an otherwise productive female instinct.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@prolifefrenchie Actually not true.
A majority of women have sex with a minority of men.
If women want sex, they will get sex, even if 95% of men are celibate priests. The same cannot be said in reverse.
It is also true that men should be celibate until married. Virtues are universal.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@Aris_Utensil True.
The most realistic way to do this imo would be to remove workforce discrimination law, combined with changing the incentive structure and propaganda machines to not encourage women to go to school till after their fertile years

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@maryarchived @thesanityrevolt This is moving the goal post.
You said men don't feel the paternal instinct the same way women feel the maternal instinct. False. They do feel the paternal instinct toward children not their own. No one (except you) is trying imply maternal/paternal instincts are the same.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@LizzieMarbach And I'm a protestant, btw.
Traditional, not evangelical, but still. Don't agree with the Wilsons on a lot theologically.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@LizzieMarbach The issue is not "evangelism", it's the way that Evangelicals think about/execute evangelism.
You're making a judgment about the state of their salvation based on their lack of adherence to a very new theological position and your opinion that they sound mean.

[Rising Zoomer @RisingZoomer]

@maryarchived I'm married, a chrisitan, patriarchalist, and monarchist.
You're missing the mark with this one. Men do not have "baby fever" in the same way women do, no, but we absolutely feel a deep need to play the role of a guardian protector long before we have a wife or kids.