I don’t even know what to say! 😶☺️😊😭🙌🏼🙏🏼💕✨
I was actually just worried about why we never heard him go on the radio! I was thinking all sorts of scenarios worried the DJs would have a… https://t.co/4y9hHspQ76
📌Please refrain from making uneducated assumptions
https://t.co/AYSp9AtpuW
In PD Notebook (), tax accountant Yang Eun-jin explains that advance payments are tied to future projects such as albums, tours, etc. The program states these funds are provided by distributors and organizers to secure rights to upcoming activities.
CBX's dispute with SM concerned access to settlement data and transparency of past earnings.
Investors do not provide billions of won based on a stack of historical internal settlement sheets from a previous agency. They pay advances based on binding contracts for future deliverables that the current entity is legally responsible for producing.
The actual allegations raised in the PD Notebook investigation concern something else entirely.
Testimony from individuals associated with 100RED, INB100, BPM and related entities claimed that funds secured for future activities using artists’ IP were allegedly not fully used for those activities.
Instead, substantial amounts were reportedly routed to the chairman’s personal account, and affiliated companies allegedly did not receive sufficient funds to operate normally.
This has nothing to do with EXO, current members, or SM Entertainment. The artists involved are victims in both cases. This should not be overlooked.
It’s disturbing how normalized it is in Kpop to blame idols for everything while turning a blind eye to abuse and exploitation of big companies. Idols r victims yet some r perfectly fine watching them suffer as long as they think it gives their fave a better chance to succeed