A reminder that there were exactly zero "irregularities" in 2020.
What we did have were:
-Recounts in Georgia.
-Hand count in Arizona.
-multiple defamation suits all with the same conclusion.
-A 2000 mules "documentary" that withered ten seconds after it was challenged in court.
@RandPaul DOCS:
https://t.co/Zjn5YUmzdN
"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."
Today Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState issued a press release claiming that a Risk Limiting Audit and a ballot image audit of the May Primary "...proves Georgia Elections are Most Accurate in the Nation" 🙄.
What the SOS didn't tell you is that the ballot image audit vendor, Enhanced Voting (who also happens to be, among other things, the Election Night Reporting vendor), is required to allow counties to fix any "problems". Sounds alot like a coverup.
He also didn't tell you that Fulton County unlawfully scanned some 18,000 ballots on the day of certification- which replaced the same number which were successfully cast at the polling locations. Sounds alot like ballot laundering.
And if that weren't enough- the ballots "randomly" selected for the Risk Limiting Audit- just so happened to be from only those which were scanned one week after the polls closed. Yes, they audited the unlawfully scanned ballots. Sounds alot like an Enron audit.
@statesunited, and @stephen_richer, let's compare apples to apples. This irrefutably establishes that all of GA's election safeguards that you touted- are effectively meaningless as they were entirely circumvented. Yet again.
That's right, some 18,000 ballots of unknown provenance were unlawfully scanned a week after the polls closed- behind closed doors, replacing those cast in-person by the voter, and then those ballots were twice audited. Same thing happened in 2024 when Fulton County scanned ~12,000 ballots one week after the polls closed. How you like those safeguards? Better yet, how you like them apples?
https://t.co/KAS6lOnJet
Under President Trump's leadership, over 146,000 children were found from the Biden-Harris open border, which allowed 475,000 children to be trafficked.
Some of these children were rap*d over 600x-700x. Guess where they found most of the children? In DEEP BLUE SANCTUARY CITIES.
@Garrett_Archer What’s the point of checking signatures when you can just draw a smiley face or a character from Nintendo. Wait, are you even aware that they are allowing this? Need the evidence? Dipshit…
California Ballot Worker BUSTED breaking into a locked cabinet involved in ELECTION FRAUD.
A Shasta County election employee was caught red-handed breaking into a secured ballot cabinet, copying sensitive docs to rig an election, compromising voter data.
Election documents and materials were removed from the cabinet. Extra ballots were handed out by the employee, unauthorized copies of those records were made, providing the copies to Shasta County Clerk and Registrar of Voters Clint Curtis.
Alleged premature distribution of extra ballots, routine post-election reconciliation revealed discrepancies suggesting a number of additional ballots may have been handed out to voters before Election Day by one employee.
Sensitive voter data is now potentially compromised, copies reportedly included names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, signatures, and voter explanations for replacement ballots.
I'm going to have to break with NRO on this because I fundamentally disagree with this sentence from the editorial:
"...Trump’s unworthy and abusive campaign to investigate and prosecute his political opponents."
Trump didn't make these individuals his "political opponents" -- that reverses the causation.
The fact that individuals launch misguided and/or illegitimate efforts at a sitting President, or at an individual out of office with an intent to run for office again, does NOT then become provide them with a cloak of immunity from their own potential criminal behavior.
To dismiss all the investigations as "retribution" - and declare them illegitimate based on that label -- is de facto immunity they purchased for themselves by going first.
The cautionary tale in this is as follows:
Do not employ the criminal justice system as a political tool to stymie the implementation of policies you disagree with after losing an election.
Political motives should not provide protection from an investigation as to whether your own conduct was, in fact, legal.
Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:
"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.
No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.
So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.
Can you prove it? No.
And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.
That is not an accident.
And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.
The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."
@BretWeinstein
Man, if only it were possible to use paper ballots and fully understand your elections instead of machines that are purposely built to prevent audits and are hard to learn. Now, if you’re thinking of saying the machines aren’t complicated then realize how racist you will sound when you call black fulton county election workers stupid.
Joe Scarborough owns two of the worst takes of all time.
In 2020 Scarborough claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant and that anybody who believed it was real was a fool.
In 2024 Scarborough claimed that Biden's mental fitness was better than ever.